Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 23-09-2008, 03:26 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by winensky View Post
Lovely wide field, great colour. Couldnt pick the focus problem but my eyes are getting worse by the month. At ISO1800 and those exposure times the nebs are comming out to play.I don't knoww if you can selectively unsharp and layer the glob but a great job all together.
Thanks Matt.
One day I'll get my act together and really plan one of these imaging sessions!! Flats, Darks, various exposure times etc etc.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 23-09-2008, 06:08 PM
Jen's Avatar
Jen
Moving to Pandora

Jen is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Swan Hill
Posts: 7,102
Nice pic Doug
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 24-09-2008, 12:04 AM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jen View Post
Nice pic Doug

Cheers Jen - thanks for having a look
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 24-09-2008, 04:24 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,286
Nice Dougie but was is the opitmal ISO setting for images i've tried 400 and 800 without that much difference. Is it better to take more shorter timed exposures or less longer ones. Personally I would think to err on the side of more shorter exposures reducing the effects of rotaional distortion, tracking errors and noise pollution etc
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 24-09-2008, 04:36 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
in ideal conditions you would go for longer exposures.. Rotation and tracking shouldn't be a problem if you're aligned properly..
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 24-09-2008, 05:09 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
Nice Dougie but was is the opitmal ISO setting for images i've tried 400 and 800 without that much difference. Is it better to take more shorter timed exposures or less longer ones. Personally I would think to err on the side of more shorter exposures reducing the effects of rotaional distortion, tracking errors and noise pollution etc
No Trev,
Live on the edge mate!!!

I'm just trying to push the little envelope I find myself in!

Sometimes it pays off - in this case I'm not convinced, I sacrificed NR to get the large numbers of exposures in the given time.Also no LP filter didn't help.

Re your question - I've always looked at it thusly...
I can take a number of 5min and 10min subs. The 10min sub will record fainter photons than the 5min sub. I can stack as many of those 5min subs as I like - the fainter photons recorded in my 10min subs will never be there in that 5min stack. So my goal is to stack as many 10min exps as possible Genius!!

All the best
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 24-09-2008, 05:12 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Are you calibrating, Doug? Flats and darks?

It's a nice image! Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 24-09-2008, 09:35 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post
Are you calibrating, Doug? Flats and darks?

It's a nice image! Well done.
Cheers Mike,
Basically a rough - no ICNR, 10 min subs, iso1600 stack...so no calibration on this image at all!

Just a bit of fun really!!

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 24-09-2008, 09:42 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Fun It maybe Doug, but you are getting some nice results, and you are having fun, arn't ya, so what else is there.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 24-09-2008, 11:43 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
Fun It maybe Doug, but you are getting some nice results, and you are having fun, arn't ya, so what else is there.

Leon
Nice summing up leon!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement