Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW
Nice Dougie but was is the opitmal ISO setting for images i've tried 400 and 800 without that much difference. Is it better to take more shorter timed exposures or less longer ones. Personally I would think to err on the side of more shorter exposures reducing the effects of rotaional distortion, tracking errors and noise pollution etc 
|
No Trev,
Live on the edge mate!!!
I'm just trying to push the little envelope I find myself in!
Sometimes it pays off - in this case I'm not convinced, I sacrificed NR to get the large numbers of exposures in the given time.Also no LP filter didn't help.
Re your question - I've always looked at it thusly...
I can take a number of 5min and 10min subs. The 10min sub will record fainter photons than the 5min sub. I can stack as many of those 5min subs as I like - the fainter photons recorded in my 10min subs will never be there in that 5min stack. So my goal is to stack as many 10min exps as possible

Genius!!

All the best
Doug