April 24th H-alpha view

[Peter Ward]

With the risk of getting boring..............yet another solar post below

The link is here

[Larryp (Laurie)]

Very nice, Peter

[Matt Wastell (Matt)]

Boring - hardly!

[Solar (Ralph Smith)]

NEVER Boring Peter.
The detail and res when you zoom in is breath taking, absolutely.
When you zoom right out it seems to lose some definition. Is that because of the screen on my laptop or somthing else Peter.

[Peter Ward]

Originally Posted by Solar

NEVER Boring Peter.
The detail and res when you zoom in is breath taking, absolutely.
When you zoom right out it seems to lose some definition. Is that because of the screen on my laptop or somthing else Peter.

I do all my processing on a colour calibrated 24" monitor (note to self: a 27" is well overdue) which has 1920 x 1200 native resolution....anything less will lose detail by merging pixels.

Originally Posted by Matt Wastell

Boring - hardly!

Originally Posted by Larryp

Very nice, Peter

Thanks guys.

[Solar (Ralph Smith)]

[QUOTE=Peter Ward;969748]I do all my processing on a colour calibrated 24" monitor (note to self: a 27" is well overdue) which has 1920 x 1200 native resolution....anything less will lose detail by merging pixels.





Thanks guys.[/QUOTE
Ta Peter,
I was hoping that was the case.

[pw (Peter)]

Boringly brilliant, seems very detailed for a 90mm scope, well done.

[Peter Ward]

Originally Posted by pw

Boringly brilliant, seems very detailed for a 90mm scope, well done.

Thanks PW....great initials I might ad

My clunker PC with the six core i-7 CPU ( ) has just finished the prom data, hence a much improved version has been uploaded to the same URL.

Enjoy !

[Peter Ward]

Originally Posted by pw

Boringly brilliant, seems very detailed for a 90mm scope, well done.

I've mused over why this system, despite its 90mm aperture, works so well. I can't say I really know the answer.

I suspect it comes down to using a extremely well corrected objective, stopped down, to probably make it perfect.

Couple that an etalon working with an effectively parallel wavefront: i.e no instrument induced hot spots or banding, it simply works.
The system has only been limited by seeing in my experience with it to date.

That said I hope be able to get to play with a 152mm Lunt for a short time
later in the year, so it will be interesting to compare the two.

[Paul Haese]

Nice work Peter. How many frames are you stacking now? And; is this single or double stacked?

[Peter Ward]

Originally Posted by Paul Haese

Nice work Peter. How many frames are you stacking now? And; is this single or double stacked?

Thanks Paul, sorry for the late response, ... 'been away for a bit. This is a four frame mosaic, each run450 frames...or about 3 gig of data per run...which taxes even the fastest PC's at the moment.

Bad news for me is my GX died.... (failed sensor) and is on its way back to Canada for repair (or hopefully replacement) ...and we are really pushing it now for its return before we leave for the Eclipse on the 8th.

P.S.
Double stacked.

[icytailmark (Mark)]

great work peter. I was thinking about buying a new monitor too. The dell ultrasharp U2713H looks like a good monitor.