
Hi all,
I am now thinking of eventually upgrading from my old Celestar 8, and I have narrowed my choice down to one of those two OTA's.
Both have XLT coatings and a 9x50 viewfinder.
I do want to get into astrophoto in a big way, so I am very keen on the EDGE-HD: sharper pictures, a flat FOV, and also it will fully use the sensor area of a full frame DSLR, which would make it a futureproof purchase (upgrading from my Sony A57 to a full frame Sony DSLR is a purchase consideration at some stage). It minimises mirror shift and supposedly adjusts to temperature variations faster than the standard OTAs, and lastly, it is a few kgs lighter than the 11" OTA, and that matters.
The few negatives of sorts are the limiting magnitude, 14.4 on the 9.25" as opposed to 14.7 for the 11", and the slightly better resolutions for the 11", however I wonder if those are really enough to go to the 11", despite the strong lure of a "bigger" scope...
Right now, I can also get the 9.25" EDGE HD for at least $800 cheaper than the standard 11" OTA, at not much over $3k; that definitely matters.
I welcome recommendations / comments by owners of either of those two OTAs.
Thanks in advance
Guy