Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 16-03-2013, 08:56 PM
ChrisM's Avatar
ChrisM
Sandy Ridge Observatory

ChrisM is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Gippsland, VIC
Posts: 768
First go at PixInsight

This pic of M83 is my first effort with PixInsight and in fact my first effort at combining subs. I saw PI demonstrated at AAIC two years ago and decided that I needed to learn that rather than Photoshop. In lieu of any sort of software manual, I found Harry's video tutorials very helpful, so followed his workflow and experimented a bit.

The picture is not cropped, and comprises 11 x 60 sec subs taken last Thursday with my D7000 at ISO 1600.

I know that the tracking was not perfect; I need to tweak the polar alignment. It's obviously quite critical at long focal lengths with no guiding.

I tried to look up the two little galaxies at about the 4 o'clock position but they did not feature in my star atlas.

Anyway, comments welcome.
Chris
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M83_11x60s_DBE_BN_CC_GR_HT_HDRMT_ACDNR_CT-3.jpg)
195.9 KB116 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-03-2013, 09:31 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,786
Hi Chris,
Nice job.

The two faint galaxies are PGC48132 and PGC724525 -
these are both 613 million light years away.

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-03-2013, 09:39 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
Great looking galaxy photo Chris.

Nice colours.

Good luck with PI.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-03-2013, 11:31 PM
ChrisM's Avatar
ChrisM
Sandy Ridge Observatory

ChrisM is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Gippsland, VIC
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post

The two faint galaxies are PGC48132 and PGC724525 -
these are both 613 million light years away.

cheers
Allan
Thanks Alan.
What reference did you use to look them up?

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-03-2013, 12:02 AM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Nice work, Chris! The AnnotateImage script in PI will label all the small fuzzies for you.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-03-2013, 12:19 AM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Well done Chris. The stars and colour look pretty good.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-03-2013, 12:47 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
great job, might give it a slight saturation boost to taste
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-03-2013, 01:39 AM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Nice image Chris.

I suspect Rogelio sold many a copy of PI for Juan and the team based on demos at AAIC!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-03-2013, 02:16 AM
dvj's Avatar
dvj (John)
Registered User

dvj is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 755
That is a very detailed image. Well done and not too saturated to my taste.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17-03-2013, 05:41 AM
stevous67 (Steve M)
Registered User

stevous67 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 633
Chris,

11 x 60sec subs? What scope are you using? Very good detail for this short exposure length.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-03-2013, 09:39 AM
ChrisM's Avatar
ChrisM
Sandy Ridge Observatory

ChrisM is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Gippsland, VIC
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
great job, might give it a slight saturation boost to taste
Thanks David, I did give it a little boost but didn't want to overdo it. Maybe I should refer to a HST image for reference.
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 17-03-2013, 09:41 AM
ChrisM's Avatar
ChrisM
Sandy Ridge Observatory

ChrisM is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Gippsland, VIC
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF View Post
Nice image Chris.

I suspect Rogelio sold many a copy of PI for Juan and the team based on demos at AAIC!
Thanks Rob. What sold it for me (not owning or having tried anything else) was the fact that it was written specifically for this purpose, and that it does everything (supposedly). I'm sure others will have varying views though.
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17-03-2013, 09:43 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisM View Post
Thanks Alan.
What reference did you use to look them up?

Chris

Hi Chris,
I had no reference other than google & so many other people
had named those two faint galaxies in the same way.
I used that info in my write-up on flickr photos:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/2471943...in/photostream

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17-03-2013, 09:46 AM
ChrisM's Avatar
ChrisM
Sandy Ridge Observatory

ChrisM is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Gippsland, VIC
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevous67 View Post
Chris,

11 x 60sec subs? What scope are you using? Very good detail for this short exposure length.

Steve
Thanks Steve, John and Peter for the comments on colour and detail. The RAW frames from the DSLR show some detail but I must say that PixInsight works very well to pull out more and control the noise. Also used ICNR for each frame. Imaged through a 14" LX200 ACF at 3556 mm FL.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17-03-2013, 10:40 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
Really nice result Chris, those elongated stars aren't to bad and could be fixed easily. Saturation and detail extraction are a subjective thing and whether you upped it or downed it would just please some eyes but annoy others so your eyes are the ones that really count

M83 was my first CCD image too way back in 03 yours is much better

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17-03-2013, 12:44 PM
ChrisM's Avatar
ChrisM
Sandy Ridge Observatory

ChrisM is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Gippsland, VIC
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post

M83 was my first CCD image too way back in 03 yours is much better

Mike
Thanks Mike. I think that when we are starting out, a classic spiral appearing on the screen does wonders. You must have been thrilled with yours 10 years ago!
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17-03-2013, 01:00 PM
IanP
Registered User

IanP is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: West Coast
Posts: 787
That’s really incredible result for such short exposure. Well done!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17-03-2013, 01:37 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Very nice rendition. Cool pic.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17-03-2013, 01:59 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Looks good Chris.

I'm currently going through the learning process with PixInsight myself. Tutorials and trial to see if I can get my head around it's way of working
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement