Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-11-2012, 11:25 PM
E_ri_k (Erik)
Registered User

E_ri_k is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lakes Entrance
Posts: 846
NGC 253 Reprocess

So with a lot of help I have managed to learn a bit of PixInsight, and reprocessed my old data of NGC 253. I recon its a huge difference from my original attempt.

What do you guys think?
Erik
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (253 processed.jpg)
103.6 KB70 views
Click for full-size image (Final Working.jpg)
86.6 KB81 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2012, 11:35 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
A big improvement, Erik!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-11-2012, 12:00 AM
blink138's Avatar
blink138 (Pat)
Registered User

blink138 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: perth w.a.
Posts: 2,276
OMG I want pixinsight....... what a difference!
pat
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-11-2012, 01:24 AM
Mighty_oz (Marcus)
Registered User

Mighty_oz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atm somewhere in Perth
Posts: 575
Well i think the first shot titled processed looks better, and they seem to be reversed to each other.
Anyways good effort.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-11-2012, 03:50 AM
ourkind's Avatar
ourkind (Carlos)
There is no substitute

ourkind is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,964
Hi Erik I'm going out on a limb here but personally and IMHO I preferred your first effort all along, even above the tweeks by others.

I think your original image just needs some blue regions "star growth activity".

As a yard stick here are two images of NGC 253 one from APOD and the other from WIKI.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (APOD.jpg)
83.3 KB38 views
Click for full-size image (WIKI.jpg)
32.1 KB35 views

Last edited by ourkind; 08-11-2012 at 04:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-11-2012, 09:46 AM
E_ri_k (Erik)
Registered User

E_ri_k is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lakes Entrance
Posts: 846
Thanks Rick. I'm not sure what happened, but yes, it's been mirrored somehow, I didn't even notice! I might have a play with my original in PI as well and see what I can do. I prefer the second, I think it's got more detail and better colour.

Thanks for looking.
Erik
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-11-2012, 10:06 PM
Garbz (Chris)
Registered User

Garbz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 646
Personally I love the colour of the reprocessed one, but the tone of the original. So much detail in the dust lane seems in my opinion to have killed that soft centre glow from the middle of the galaxy.

That is just a personal preference though. The second one really does look sharper and more detailed.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-11-2012, 11:27 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,786
Hi Erik,
I hope you don't mind.
I combined both your images 50/50 opacity & played with the curves
to reveal the barred spiral.
What do you think?
(I had to flip one image & play with transform & warp which left slight star misalignment.)
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC 253 CN a&b combined_a.jpg)
42.7 KB30 views
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-11-2012, 09:51 AM
E_ri_k (Erik)
Registered User

E_ri_k is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lakes Entrance
Posts: 846
Not at all. I like it. I know what you mean, Is has lost that central glow. It looked really good at the time, but now I'm not too sure now. Your version is a good compromise between the both.
Erik
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-11-2012, 06:51 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,786
Thanks Erik,
I think your data is good enough to re-process a little.
Blending an older version with a later is often a good method.

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-11-2012, 10:41 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
Two very good photos Erik, but I prefer the less colourful original.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-11-2012, 10:46 PM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
I like the reprocessed one better, but the combined one by Allan is great, too.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement