Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 28-09-2012, 10:27 AM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
The "original" Meade/ Celestron X0.63 reducer was specifically designed for a distance between the rear rubber shoulder to the film plane of 110mm. (The doublet has a focal length of 240mm)
There is no restriction on the positioning of the reducer in the optical axis, generally it is mounted on the rear SCT thread of the mirror cell.

Some years ago there was a "dud" batch of these reducers ( with a far shorter focal length - they were similar to the x0.33 reducer focal length) and this gave rise to many discussion on many forums.

Two years ago there was talk that the reducer had indeed been changed to a shorter focal length. I have never seen one of these.
Interestingly, no one has commented on the Celestron version...this still seems to be the same as the original and still needs the 110mm spacing.
(If someone has a shorter focal length Meade x0.63 reducer I'd love to hear from them)
Ken
I have just bought a new one to go on my new C11 (). I set it up last night with the LISA attached and it seems to work very well. No idea about the image quality as I'm not really interested in the quality of the off axis stars on the slit. It certainly produced a nice spectra of R71. I will take it off again and measure the fl.
The LISA has a focal distance of 41mm to the T thread. The adaptor I have is about 10mm long so about 51mm in total. It probably doesn't matter for spectroscopy.
Cheers

Terry
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 28-09-2012, 10:34 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Terry,
Hmmmm "new C11".....
Did you buy the Meade or Celestron version of the reducer??
I'd certainly be interested to find out the focal length and also the reduction you get with your spacing....
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 28-09-2012, 10:39 AM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
Terry,
Hmmmm "new C11".....
Did you buy the Meade or Celestron version of the reducer??
I'd certainly be interested to find out the focal length and also the reduction you get with your spacing....
The meade version. It was about 1/2 the price.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 28-09-2012, 10:10 PM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
Terry,
Hmmmm "new C11".....
Did you buy the Meade or Celestron version of the reducer??
I'd certainly be interested to find out the focal length and also the reduction you get with your spacing....
I measured the fl tonight of my new meade FR and it is almost exactly 200mm from the back of the flange.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 29-09-2012, 07:02 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Thanks Terry.
That's very close to the original....
The 45mm quoted seems either to be an error or the spacer required for a DSLR.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement