Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 31-07-2012, 06:15 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Lunt Solar Wedge 2" and ed80

I was wondering if i could use the Lunt Solar Wedge 2" with a ed80? is is safe to use pointing the ed80 at the sun?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-07-2012, 07:00 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
As I understand it the wedge is only suitable for refractors. So at a guess I would say yes.

I am eagerly awaiting the arrival of my new wedge too. So I will be using a refractor to image with.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-07-2012, 07:36 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
David,
Yes is the answer!
I have the Baader wedge, similar to the Lunt and they are safely rated to be used on simple refractors (ie achromats or refractors with front lens elements only) up to 150mm and beyond.
You will have no problems with the ED80.
I'm going to use both a 100mm and 150mm achromats with the wedge for white light imaging.
Just don't forget to add the ND3.8 and the Continuum filter for maximum safety and best results.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-07-2012, 08:17 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
does anything go onto the front to protect the lens?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-07-2012, 08:25 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
David,
Yes is the answer!
I have the Baader wedge, similar to the Lunt and they are safely rated to be used on simple refractors (ie achromats or refractors with front lens elements only) up to 150mm and beyond.
You will have no problems with the ED80.
I'm going to use both a 100mm and 150mm achromats with the wedge for white light imaging.
Just don't forget to add the ND3.8 and the Continuum filter for maximum safety and best results.
is the baader any better than the Lunt?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31-07-2012, 08:58 PM
Derek Klepp's Avatar
Derek Klepp
Registered User

Derek Klepp is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NE NSW
Posts: 2,469
Dave I think they are much of a muchness.One thing I cannot get enough inward focus on my Meade 80mm APO unless I use the Meade UWA eyepieces I have. Otherwise I use a 2x Barlow.If you get a wedge I would recommend a Baader Solar continuum Filter. Although I can never replicate what I see through the eyepiece photographically the view is amazing.Another note I put a Variable Polarising filter(Lumnicon) in front of the Lunt Wedge on a 127mm refractor and cooked the coatings clear.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31-07-2012, 09:31 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Klepp View Post
Dave I think they are much of a muchness.One thing I cannot get enough inward focus on my Meade 80mm APO unless I use the Meade UWA eyepieces I have. Otherwise I use a 2x Barlow.If you get a wedge I would recommend a Baader Solar continuum Filter. Although I can never replicate what I see through the eyepiece photographically the view is amazing.Another note I put a Variable Polarising filter(Lumnicon) in front of the Lunt Wedge on a 127mm refractor and cooked the coatings clear.
is there an example somewhere of some setup like that?

it wont really damage the coatings?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2012, 01:14 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
The intensity of the solar radiation on the front of the objective is very low, 98% of the energy goes straight through the lens and there is very little, if any, heat build-up on the front.
All the heat and most of the light also goes through the Herschel wedge, hence the heat trap/ deflector/ diffuser on the rear of the wedge. About 4% is reflected towards the eyepiece/ CCD.
An ND3.8, as a minimum, MUST be used between the wedge and the eyepiece/ CCD. I also add a variable ND filter and the Continuum to get the most comfortable view.
In normal use there is NO heat build-up at the eyepiece/ CCD - it's very safe.
I initially built my own Herschel wedge using a 60mm, 30 degree prism from Surplus Shed - worked 100% and gave much better results than either of my objective filters (JMB, Baader Solar film).
The "Cool" ceramic heat sink on the Baader design is very effective, and there is no hot exit beam. All the other designs, Lunt, Intes etc dump the excess energy out the side of the wedge housing.
HTH
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-08-2012, 02:44 AM
Miaplacidus's Avatar
Miaplacidus (Brian)
He used to cut the grass.

Miaplacidus is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 1,235
I've been looking at these also.
Does anyone have them available in Oz at the moment?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2012, 03:21 AM
frolinmod's Avatar
frolinmod
Registered User

frolinmod is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 573
I'm using a Lunt 2" Herschel wedge with an Explore Scientific ED102 triplet. The Lunt wedge has an ND3 filter permanently installed. Even when pointed at the sun all day, the wedge doesn't even get hot. Just a little bit warm. The result is just a tad bright, so I add either a polarizer filter or a Baader Continuum filter. Because of the way the wedge works, the polarizer can be rotated to adjust the brightness. I've been using a Lunt zoom eyepiece.

However, when I use this set up for public outreach, a certain percentage of the population doesn't show as much respect for my equipment as I'd like. They grab and yank. For that reason I've had to replace the stock focuser on the ED102 with a 3-inch Feather Touch. They can grab and yank that until the cows come home and it won't budge.

And no, you don't add any filter over the front of the OTA. All the light and heat goes straight through the OTA and into the wedge. 95.4% of that goes straight out the back of the wedge and into a ceramic heat sink. The rest is attenuated by the ND3 filter to a safe level.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-08-2012, 12:43 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
thanks guys - i lashed out and got the photo version of the Baader - comes wit han inbuild finder
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-08-2012, 01:03 PM
pvelez's Avatar
pvelez (Pete)
Registered User

pvelez is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,250
Emma Chisset?

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-08-2012, 01:32 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvelez View Post
Emma Chisset?

Pete

????????????
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-08-2012, 01:34 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
after goofgling - ahh you want the price - not cheap at 795
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-08-2012, 03:04 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
I went with the Lunt mostly because I found looking at a lime-green sun through the Baader a trifle odd.

Both are the same for imaging though.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-08-2012, 04:34 PM
pvelez's Avatar
pvelez (Pete)
Registered User

pvelez is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvelez View Post
Emma Chisset?

Pete
If you read it aloud it makes sense.

Thanks for the price - certainly not cheap. I'd like to see your pics

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-08-2012, 05:08 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Peter,
Remove the Continuum filter from the Baader and replace with a variable ND and you'll get "white" views....
(The Continuum does give better contrast)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-08-2012, 05:46 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Could be wrong, but I recall reading that a plain vanilla photographic green is "almost" as good as the Baader Continuum as well. Merlin?
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-08-2012, 05:54 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Yeah, if you want to improve the contrast on the cheap...a light green filter will do the job well...almost, but not as good as the Continuum....
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-08-2012, 06:00 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miaplacidus View Post
I've been looking at these also.
Does anyone have them available in Oz at the moment?

MIne is waiting at Bintel for a shipment of other goodies to arrive. Next week is going to be a very expensive week. Once I get the chance to use the wedge I will be putting up images.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement