Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-01-2006, 11:50 AM
FOOTPRINT
Registered User

FOOTPRINT is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld.
Posts: 339
Canon before/after Mods.

Hi All,
Thought you might like to see the difference between what I get with the Canon EOS300D now modified (Colour/IR Filter removed) and before modification, pictures of M42 taken Before/after Mods.(un-modded Pix last year), I like the unmodded colours, but also like the modded Pix. imporved Ha sensitivity showing extended nebulosity (havent been able to get the Blue colour back into ngc1977 though), still learning re processing.

Both Pix taken with an ED80 Scope guided by an LX200, unmodded Pix 2 x 6 Min. DF removed, modded Pix. 4 x 6 Min. DF removed, both ISO-800.

cheers.....Jim
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M42+ED80-IIS.jpg)
40.3 KB51 views
Click for full-size image (M42_Mod-IIS.jpg)
46.1 KB50 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-01-2006, 11:53 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
you know what, i actually like the unmodded.... I know the modded shows more nebula but the mixture of blue and red is great.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-01-2006, 01:19 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Yeah same here Dave ! although It's obvious that the moded is more sensitive . This taking the IR filter out has always baffled me because with my CCD camera I need to use one otherwise I end up with corrupted colours . Anyway they still both look good Jim .
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-01-2006, 01:35 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Hate to agree....but the modded version is too overwelmed with red channel....did you apply to much red with processing.

The running man is a reflective nebula which come up as blue.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-01-2006, 03:15 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
You are only after H alpha so it might be worthwhile using a UV/IR blocking filter. Otherwise you only end up recording the heat from your feverish brow as you peer down the optic. Only joking!
Any UV present (light pollution from Hg/Na lamps)will also drown out a weak blue signal from a reflection nebula such as the running man.

Bert
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-01-2006, 05:13 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Nice comp. One thing that did spring to mind (and bear in mind I currently own a modded 300D) is that one shot was 2x6min, the other 4x6min. It would be good to have both exposure similar or the same. Nit picking? Me? OK, just a little.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-01-2006, 06:49 PM
rumples riot
Who knows

rumples riot is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackwood South Australia
Posts: 3,051
I have to agree with Gary, the time frames do not compare well. That said I do like the unmodded image colour, although more nebulosity is present in the Modded, time frame disparity aside.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-01-2006, 10:32 AM
FOOTPRINT
Registered User

FOOTPRINT is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld.
Posts: 339
Canon before/after Mods.

Hi All,
Thanks for all the comments, and yes I realise there was a 2 x time difference in addition of pictures, but its all I could dig up for a comparison, and two more exposures of the unmodded picture added, would make no difference to the colour and definition, no colour adjustment was made to the modded picture, Im trying CWB (custom white balance) hopefully that will do the trick while still showing the increased Ha sensitivity, Ive tried UV/IR block Filters, made no difference to the All Red effect, there will be an answer, Anyway this type of Astrophotography using an uncooled conventional Camera, but with that LARGE 6 Mp Chip is the way to go, and im more than happy with the results by comparison to the cooled MX7C with the 470 K approx. CCD chip, which I now use for guiding, it is however better on small faint objects (galaxies, nebula Etc.) Horses for courses ??, Ill post the results of the CWB Pix shortly.

cheers......Jim
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement