Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 19-01-2006, 09:36 PM
BerzerkerNerd
42

BerzerkerNerd is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 46
Nebula filters


Hi Lateralus and everyone- i am noo to the forums- So please be gentle.
I own the Astronomik UHC in the 1 1/4"- I love and cherish it, it has a special container that secretely rests under my pillow at night- when i can not be not outside using it !!
Seriously though, over the recent moon cycle, on the wane with about a half or more moon, finding nebs was tough,- so, I wack the filter into the widest field EP I have at hand and search. Hey presto, with the UHC screwed into the EP you will then find Turantula, Carina, Orion, Crab.. (joking) anyhow the more popular nebs. The only drawback is the stars in the nebulosity taking on a peculiar greenish tinge- but the gas tendrils and filiments really do come out to play with your bio-optics. At around $180 the astronomik isnt a cheapy but not that excy' either, and please it really is worth scrimping for the extra money for this filter, my scope is a 10" Dob. Reflector 1250 F.L at F5. Skies here at Toogoom 25 Km north of Hervey bay are pretty good- Saturn and Jupiter at 420X around 2.30 am on calm mornings. Life could be worse, but the postage cost on equipment mounts up. In short get the best nebular filter you can afford. It will be your friend and ally.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 19-01-2006, 09:58 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Welcome Nerdmeister! I never thought of trying the filter for cutting out moonlight scatter. Great idea! I will try it next time I'm at a dark site.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 20-01-2006, 09:25 AM
BerzerkerNerd
42

BerzerkerNerd is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 46
Yes there is nothing they can not do:not. But Jano' what you said earlier about differentiating between neb. and other objects in the LMC and SMC is where the filters come into their own. Under dark clear skies, the astronomik performs excellently on DSO and nebular in general, so we differ here on their use, but again it all comes down to personal gear, inclination and optical perception of the individual, which seems to vary dramatically from person to person.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 20-01-2006, 09:32 AM
rumples riot
Who knows

rumples riot is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackwood South Australia
Posts: 3,051
I have a meade broadband filter and it works very well on the tarantula, Eta carina and the swan in light polluted skies. Just my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 20-01-2006, 09:45 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
"Objective" testing of filters

M Gavin has tested the performance of various filters using a spectroscope.
Shows EXACTLY what is happening and which wavelengths are being transmitted/ blocked well worht looking at. When I get some time (!!) I'll do the same for the filters I have.

//home.freeuk.com/m.gavin/grism.htm

If this link doesn't get you there, go to his home page and look at the LH list near the bottom.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 20-01-2006, 08:28 PM
acropolite's Avatar
acropolite (Phil)
Registered User

acropolite is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
I've got the DGM NPB as well, I agree with Mike & Steve.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 23-01-2006, 09:28 PM
Dobman (Simon)
Deep Sky Fan

Dobman is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Safety Bay, WA
Posts: 55
DGM NPB Filter

Just got my filter in the mail today . Cant wait to try it out. The next Bridgenorth viewing nite is coming and the weather is looking good so far( that could change in a blink here in Tas tho!!)
First lite has to be on M42 ( what else!) I'll post my initial thoughts after the weekend
Clear Skies
Simon
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 24-01-2006, 05:41 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Good to hear.

Wavelandscott and I had a chance to try out his Astronomik CLS filter vs my DGM NPB on Saturday night.

While on M42 they appeared to do a similar job, Scott confirmed that on Eta Carinae, the DGM NPB showed much more nebula. So it's worth remembering that some filters work better on some objects - it depends what type of gas they're emitting.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement