Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 31-01-2012, 09:20 PM
stevous67 (Steve M)
Registered User

stevous67 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 633
Talking Another SCT Collimation Method - Simple?

Hi all,

I know there are many collimation methods out there, some visual based, some software assisted, others supported by simple to complex third party devices. I know, as I have beat up myself trying many of them to find the right solution for me, my equipment and my purpose for astrophotography.

The scope type I'm talking about is one with a fixed primary and an adjustable secondary mirror. I've now tried it numerous times, and now on my Planewave 12.5. I hear that people think this is a forgiven scope to collimate, but to get it right, it has been still challenging. Anyway, if you're interested in having a read on an alternate approach and a variation on the single defocused star, see the link below...

http://www.mpas.asn.au/multipledefoc...ollimation.htm

I always think sharing is good, and I've learnt much more from others than I have on my own. So if this is helpful to anyone, that's great. It is simple, you can do it on your own, and it works.

Bye

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-01-2012, 10:19 PM
MarkA (Mark)
Registered User

MarkA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 33
Thanks Steve
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-01-2012, 11:35 PM
toc (Tim)
Registered User

toc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 863
At the risk of sounding thick - Ive re-read the article a few times, and Im struggling to understand just what you have to do - I get the idea that its difficult to determine if a star is exactly centered, and that trying to collimate with an off center star can lead to problems. After that Im lost
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-02-2012, 07:12 AM
stevous67 (Steve M)
Registered User

stevous67 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 633
Hi Tim,

You're right, collimating on an off centre star is incorrect, that is why I suggested for MaximDL users to turn on their cross hair to determine the central point. Here is where the concentric stars must be in the FOV.

The elongated stars surrounding the centre will help you determine where this collimation point is, thats all.

I'm not sure about other peoples experiences, but in the past I found using a single defocused star could lead to not having this collimation point being central to the FOV. Having extra stars within the FOV helps to determine where this is. That's all.

Cheers

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-02-2012, 07:30 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Very clever Steve. Out of the box thinking. Never considered the field shape with collimation.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2012, 11:50 AM
stevous67 (Steve M)
Registered User

stevous67 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 633
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Very clever Steve. Out of the box thinking. Never considered the field shape with collimation.
Thanks for that Mark.

It's just an idea that is working for me. I just want something that will give 90%-95% accuracy, that is reasonably quick to do, and is most importantly ~ simple to do.

Doing your collimation this way, it's all about moving the defocused stars around your FOV, until you can see the central collimation point is middle to your FOV.

Cheers,

Steve
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement