Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-12-2011, 08:13 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
New article - How to take photographs of space

Got bored and wrote this up today. It's a bit of a rush job so I'll add to it and sharpen it a bit as I have time.

I hope it helps.

Baz.

http://asignobservatoryii.webs.com/a...graphytips.htm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-12-2011, 08:36 PM
Forgey (Paula)
Registered User

Forgey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Thurgoona, NSW
Posts: 922
Thanks Baz,
Nice write up, I can't wait to try out the widefield astrophotography with my new DSLR camera
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-12-2011, 08:45 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forgey View Post
Thanks Baz,
Nice write up, I can't wait to try out the widefield astrophotography with my new DSLR camera
Just don't forget me when you're rich and famous.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-12-2011, 03:01 PM
eskimo
Registered User

eskimo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 43
Hi Baz
what do you call "You will need a medium to large telescope"..can you give some examples?

also for this "If you want to get those tiny distant other galaxies, you will need a large-aperture telescope"

and thanks for the write up...I need all the help I can get
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-12-2011, 04:39 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by eskimo View Post
Hi Baz
what do you call "You will need a medium to large telescope"..can you give some examples?

also for this "If you want to get those tiny distant other galaxies, you will need a large-aperture telescope"

and thanks for the write up...I need all the help I can get
Something like a 120mm refractor at least, or even better, a 200 to 300mm reflector. I'm talking diameter of aperture.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-12-2011, 04:54 PM
irwjager's Avatar
irwjager (Ivo)
Registered User

irwjager is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 532
That's an awesome article Baz! (got some chuckles out of it too )
Maybe we could ask a Moderator to make it a sticky?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-12-2011, 05:17 PM
eskimo
Registered User

eskimo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodhound31 View Post
Something like a 120mm refractor at least, or even better, a 200 to 300mm reflector. I'm talking diameter of aperture.
what about a 8inch SCT?...I guess thats much the same as a 200 Dob but I gather they (SCT) let in less light..yes / no?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-12-2011, 05:27 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by eskimo View Post
what about a 8inch SCT?...I guess thats much the same as a 200 Dob but I gather they (SCT) let in less light..yes / no?
8 inch SCT will do it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14-12-2011, 05:27 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,805
Maybe you should get bored more often Baz, excellent write up mate.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 14-12-2011, 05:28 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
Maybe you should get bored more often Baz, excellent write up mate.

Leon
I was tired of picking my nose.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 14-12-2011, 06:33 PM
Osirisra's Avatar
Osirisra (Ken)
Dead God

Osirisra is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 635
Brilliant article! great advice and some good laughs.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 14-12-2011, 08:41 PM
eskimo
Registered User

eskimo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodhound31 View Post
I was tired of picking my nose.
big one eh....
okay..i have a SE8

Have pre-ordered a LX80 mount

am now thinking whether to cancel that & get the ioptron ieq45...for the gps alone over the skywatcher neq6, or wait for reviews on LX80, before making a decision

cant tell if the lx80 has GPS or not?

what are bad points between the ieq45 V neq6 otherwise

(I did say I need all the help I can get)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 15-12-2011, 07:43 AM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
Excellent article Barry, many thanks. Saved to Favourites for some serious reading later.

Cheers
Brent
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 15-12-2011, 09:30 AM
eskimo
Registered User

eskimo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 43
Barry
I have been thinking

In your write up you refer to the likely hood of having to send the kids to medical school to be used as experimental subjects....mine will leave immediately if they new this was my intention, thus leaving me with little funds to spend...

would one of these cheapies

http://www.ioptron.com/index.cfm?sel...9-78d062de17f8

on a wedge on a decent manfrotto work for the Widefield Astrophotography section?

Actually they come with a tripod so the literature says..also next version up has wedge capabilities anyway

Dont confuse this with using the SE8 on it...I am thinking just a camera??

please give me an uppercut if you think its a stupid question

Last edited by eskimo; 15-12-2011 at 10:01 AM. Reason: added about coming with tripod etc
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 15-12-2011, 11:26 AM
NeilW
Registered User

NeilW is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 307
Superb article Barry. Destined to become a classic
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 15-12-2011, 12:31 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
The goto software has to support using a wedge I think, so I'm not sure the one in the link would work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by eskimo View Post
Barry
I have been thinking

In your write up you refer to the likely hood of having to send the kids to medical school to be used as experimental subjects....mine will leave immediately if they new this was my intention, thus leaving me with little funds to spend...

would one of these cheapies

http://www.ioptron.com/index.cfm?sel...9-78d062de17f8

on a wedge on a decent manfrotto work for the Widefield Astrophotography section?

Actually they come with a tripod so the literature says..also next version up has wedge capabilities anyway

Dont confuse this with using the SE8 on it...I am thinking just a camera??

please give me an uppercut if you think its a stupid question
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 15-12-2011, 12:32 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
GPS is really not needed, you can punch your co-ordinates in from your phone etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eskimo View Post
big one eh....
okay..i have a SE8

Have pre-ordered a LX80 mount

am now thinking whether to cancel that & get the ioptron ieq45...for the gps alone over the skywatcher neq6, or wait for reviews on LX80, before making a decision

cant tell if the lx80 has GPS or not?

what are bad points between the ieq45 V neq6 otherwise

(I did say I need all the help I can get)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 15-12-2011, 01:35 PM
eskimo
Registered User

eskimo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poita View Post
The goto software has to support using a wedge I think, so I'm not sure the one in the link would work.
Thanks Peter
but more questions...

They say they have TRACKING ability....would'nt this work if on a wedge?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 15-12-2011, 04:55 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by eskimo View Post
Barry
I have been thinking

In your write up you refer to the likely hood of having to send the kids to medical school to be used as experimental subjects....mine will leave immediately if they new this was my intention, thus leaving me with little funds to spend...

would one of these cheapies

http://www.ioptron.com/index.cfm?sel...9-78d062de17f8

on a wedge on a decent manfrotto work for the Widefield Astrophotography section?

Actually they come with a tripod so the literature says..also next version up has wedge capabilities anyway

Dont confuse this with using the SE8 on it...I am thinking just a camera??

please give me an uppercut if you think its a stupid question
I've never seen one of those before so I can't comment. It looks very gimmicky and rubbish IMHO. I could be wrong, but it looks like a short-cut from a real scope or lens. I would biff that idea and try the conventional approach.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 15-12-2011, 11:05 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Thanks Barry. Nice one. BTW it is unlikely that I will ever be rich and famous.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement