Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-11-2011, 02:07 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
What's a good autoguiding camera?

I have used SBIG ST402ME, which is a very good unit. Perhaps a bit heavy and the power and connectors are a bit cheap and likely to be troublesome but cooled and sensitive and almost always gets a guide star.

Lodestar - has been a bit problematic but is promising once sorting out the darks for it. I don't think its that compatible with CCDsoft.

Fishcamp engineering - quite good, fast, reasonably sensitive, slightly heavy but lighter than ST402. Version I had would freeze but a firmware update is supposed to have fixed that.

What are others using good or bad?

I am also wondering if these new USB 2.0 DBK 618 colour cameras make good autoguiders as well?

They could do double duty -planetary or autoguiding.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-11-2011, 02:23 PM
Marke's Avatar
Marke (Mark)
Registered User

Marke is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,193
Greg I have used the Loadstar for a year now and have never done darks for it - I just plug it in and start using it . I am using Phd with it tho.
Use it at prime focus with OAG on C9.25 , RC10 and Orion 102CF and never
lost for a guide star and I just use the single usb output.
Just my 2c worth.
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-11-2011, 02:56 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,799
I reckon you cant go past the Orion Star Shoot Autoguider, I used one for quite a while and it proved very reliable, and reasonably priced as well.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-11-2011, 03:12 PM
Marke's Avatar
Marke (Mark)
Registered User

Marke is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,193
The Starshoot is good Leon , I had one before but the Loadstar is just way
more sensitive I can point it anywhere and get a good guide star it just
made life so much easier .
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-11-2011, 03:36 PM
mill's Avatar
mill (Martin)
sword collector

mill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Evelyn
Posts: 2,925
QHY5 is a good and cheap one.
Very sensitive.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-11-2011, 05:29 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,799
There you go Greg, now you have three to confuse you even more. LOL.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-11-2011, 05:44 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Thanks for those replies. Anyone using a DMK or similar?

The Lodestar is sensitive but not as sensitive as the ST402 which is also cooled and I get -15C. But its 1 power and 1 USB plus its a bit heavy but not too bad.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-11-2011, 05:45 PM
leinad's Avatar
leinad (Dan)
Registered User

leinad is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 1,307
I've used the DMK21, DSI Pro then QHY5, now Lodestar.
Lodestar is far more sensitive than the others I've tried IMO.


SBIG also have the new Kodak KAI-34 SBIG ST-i which is meant to be pretty good too.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-11-2011, 05:50 PM
cventer's Avatar
cventer
Registered User

cventer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 957
Greg,

Craig Stark in his autoguider review rates Loadstar as no 1. next in line but not far behind is the Atik 16ic, which is a cooled CCD.

I use Orion Starshoot and love it but am looking for somthing with a little less noise and better SNR.

My 2 choices right now are Loadstar or Atik 16ic.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-11-2011, 07:03 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Seems to me, that if you really want to get fussy, like when yr stuck with a dim guide star due to OAGing or/and NF and long guide expoures, anything cooled is the go so you can use a full stacked dark library with DL.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-11-2011, 07:16 PM
leinad's Avatar
leinad (Dan)
Registered User

leinad is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 1,307
I still use a dark library with the Lodestar. Even have to use a bad pixel map so the AO doesnt select a hot pixel by mistake in MaxDL.

Horses for courses.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-11-2011, 07:32 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by leinad View Post
I've used the DMK21, DSI Pro then QHY5, now Lodestar.
Lodestar is far more sensitive than the others I've tried IMO.

Thanks Leinad. Its a nice little unit. I am finding dark subtracts don't seem to work too well in CCDsoft for some reason. Its the software not the camera as it does weird dark subtracts on my ST402 also.


SBIG also have the new Kodak KAI-34 SBIG ST-i which is meant to be pretty good too.
Yes that looks good but not being delivered yet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cventer View Post
Greg,

Craig Stark in his autoguider review rates Loadstar as no 1. next in line but not far behind is the Atik 16ic, which is a cooled CCD.

I use Orion Starshoot and love it but am looking for somthing with a little less noise and better SNR.

My 2 choices right now are Loadstar or Atik 16ic.
I'll check out the Atik 16ic. Thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Seems to me, that if you really want to get fussy, like when yr stuck with a dim guide star due to OAGing or/and NF and long guide expoures, anything cooled is the go so you can use a full stacked dark library with DL.
Cooling is definitely an advantage. I see the hot pixels go and everything cleans up in the ST402 at -15C.

Quote:
Originally Posted by leinad View Post
I still use a dark library with the Lodestar. Even have to use a bad pixel map so the AO doesnt select a hot pixel by mistake in MaxDL.

Horses for courses.
I'd like to use Maxim but its not compatible with the PMX.PHD may be the go.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-11-2011, 07:36 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Atik 16ic is USB 1.1.

I wonder if that means slow downloads for guiding.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-11-2011, 08:12 PM
tlgerdes's Avatar
tlgerdes (Trevor)
Love the moonless nights!

tlgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by cventer View Post
Greg,

Craig Stark in his autoguider review rates Loadstar as no 1. next in line but not far behind is the Atik 16ic, which is a cooled CCD.

I use Orion Starshoot and love it but am looking for somthing with a little less noise and better SNR.

My 2 choices right now are Loadstar or Atik 16ic.
Marc Aragnou made a minor mod to his QHY5, he slid a piece of aluminium between the CCD and the case (ie creating a heatsink) and has early indications of about a 25% sensitivity gain with a lower noise due to better heat disipation.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-11-2011, 08:37 PM
mill's Avatar
mill (Martin)
sword collector

mill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Evelyn
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlgerdes View Post
Marc Aragnou made a minor mod to his QHY5, he slid a piece of aluminium between the CCD and the case (ie creating a heatsink) and has early indications of about a 25% sensitivity gain with a lower noise due to better heat disipation.
I did that plus a small fan.
It helps a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-11-2011, 10:04 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post

I'd like to use Maxim but its not compatible with the PMX.PHD may be the go.

Greg.
hang on,that's not right.the sky controls the mount and DL the cam. I've allways used the PME and DL. Is the PMX different?.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-11-2011, 10:17 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
I added cooling to my qhy5 and it did improve, it is more sensitive than the DMK21 I have. You are welcome to borrow my dmk to try it out.

BTW, has anyone ever cooled the DMK cameras?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-11-2011, 10:54 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
hang on,that's not right.the sky controls the mount and DL the cam. I've allways used the PME and DL. Is the PMX different?.
Yes of course. Not sure what I was thinking of. The only minor thing is CCDsoft does integrate with the Sky somewhat. It was handy in T-point models getting the first plate solve and it automatically puts in coords n CCDsoft for autoguiding to adjust the callibration.

I'll have to start using Maxim. CCDsoft is way overdue for a major overhaul.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement