Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 31-08-2011, 12:17 AM
Chillie's Avatar
Chillie (Henry)
Registered User

Chillie is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Horsham, Victoria
Posts: 443
Space Station may be abandoned

I saw this article on the BigPond web site:

http://bigpondnews.com/articles/Tech...ed_655988.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-08-2011, 01:09 AM
OICURMT's Avatar
OICURMT
Oh, I See You Are Empty!

OICURMT is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laramie, WY - United States of America
Posts: 1,555
Maybe the US should have one shuttle on "stand-by" from now on... but it probably costs too much.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-08-2011, 12:35 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
No shuttles, no manned station (maybe)

We are certainly going backwards at a great rate of knots.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-08-2011, 12:42 PM
Jeffkop's Avatar
Jeffkop (Jeff)
Star-Fishing

Jeffkop is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tuckurimba
Posts: 885
Ummm .. this might be a dumb question .. but how are they going to get the remaining americans from the space station if there aint anymore taxis ??? ... Or did they do take them aon 135 ???
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-08-2011, 01:11 PM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffkop View Post
Ummm .. this might be a dumb question .. but how are they going to get the remaining americans from the space station if there aint anymore taxis ??? ... Or did they do take them aon 135 ???
I assumed the remaining personnel would return on Russian Soyuz rockets.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31-08-2011, 01:21 PM
supernova1965's Avatar
supernova1965 (Warren)
Buddhist Astronomer

supernova1965 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phillip Island,VIC, Australia
Posts: 4,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by RB View Post
I assumed the remaining personnel would return on Russian Soyuz rockets.
I thought that there were soyuz capsules permantly docked to the station for emergency evacuations.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31-08-2011, 03:00 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,278
If it's empty, is it like a ship, can I claim salvage rights
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31-08-2011, 04:18 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
If it's empty, is it like a ship, can I claim salvage rights
Yeah, good idea and we should set all our gear up there and operate remotely. Perfect seeing.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 31-08-2011, 07:23 PM
BlackWidow's Avatar
BlackWidow (Mardy)
Seeing Stars

BlackWidow is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Adelaide Australia
Posts: 610
My wife said I should take all my Da#@M Telescope stuff and stay up thier. I knew I had a good wife



Mardy
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31-08-2011, 07:30 PM
mozzie's Avatar
mozzie (Peter)
Registered User

mozzie is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: moonee beach
Posts: 2,179
it doesn't sound good !!!!!! there's not the money to keep everything going what a shame...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 31-08-2011, 08:34 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
why cant they use richard branson's space ships?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-09-2011, 12:19 PM
Chillie's Avatar
Chillie (Henry)
Registered User

Chillie is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Horsham, Victoria
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICURMT View Post
Maybe the US should have one shuttle on "stand-by" from now on... but it probably costs too much.
Not much hope of that. When I was posting the OP, NASA TV showed NASA dismantling the launch pad.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-09-2011, 12:23 PM
Chillie's Avatar
Chillie (Henry)
Registered User

Chillie is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Horsham, Victoria
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffkop View Post
Ummm .. this might be a dumb question .. but how are they going to get the remaining americans from the space station if there aint anymore taxis ??? ... Or did they do take them aon 135 ???
Quote:
Originally Posted by RB View Post
I assumed the remaining personnel would return on Russian Soyuz rockets.
Quote:
Originally Posted by supernova1965 View Post
I thought that there were soyuz capsules permantly docked to the station for emergency evacuations.
My understanding is that they go home in the same Russian Soyuz rockets that they come up in.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-09-2011, 12:23 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Yes, NASA is dismantling the shuttle for museums etc and focusing on Falcon X as their next heavy lift vehicle. There are apparently 2 Soyuz capsules attached to the ISS at present, for emergency evacs and the like. So the return journey is not a proble, just the buses.
Maybe they have to pay the Chinese
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-09-2011, 02:16 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by traveller View Post
, just the buses.
Maybe they have to pay the Chinese
Why not everything else is made there
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-09-2011, 06:10 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
Heard a report on Star stuff that if nothing can be done by November they will remove some of the astronaut on ISS and run a skeleton astronaut staff for a while longer. They also said it wont be the end as they can operate it entirely from the ground just no research.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-09-2011, 07:07 PM
FJA's Avatar
FJA (Faith)
100% visual observing

FJA is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Isle of Wight, England
Posts: 113
They'll probably mothball it until a solution to the problem is found.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-09-2011, 07:23 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,278
How hard would it be to put a capsule on an Atlas V
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-09-2011, 10:04 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
How hard would it be to put a capsule on an Atlas V
What capsule? They mothballed that before the shuttle, thats why they need their Russian comrades and their trusty souyz. So the yanks have the rocket but no capsule and the Russians have the capsule and a faulty rocket.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-09-2011, 08:33 AM
Nortilus (Josh)
Registered User

Nortilus is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Mackay, QLD
Posts: 455
Why dont they just build new shuttles using the old design...just upgrade a few things with newer materials like the heat shielding for reentry and the computer systems...doesn't that seem like a probable solutions instead of freaking out that they dont have their latest design ready to go...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement