The seeing was OK but not the 9/10 that Skippy promised Soon after 930pm however it dropped off and stayed ordinary until just before 11.30pm when I decided to pack up. It improved a bit, probably 7/10 but i was too tired to hang around.
I still haven't processed a whole lot of them but these 2 looked OK during capture
I used Registax V5 as for me it is still delivering better results
Probably just not got the hang of V6 yet
Was pleased to get a tiny glimpse of what i think is the Encke Gap
Hi Rob, nice shots. Probably your best so far? I reckon it's about time you got serious & bought another camera mate ;-)
Are you shooting for the 6 min. max. time? I haven't seen much of an improvement in my processing with version 6 in my experimentation, if any over version 5.1 unfortunately. I think the beauty lies in the fact that it can now MAP align with no seam lines (if you know what your doing) on moon shots.
Hi Logan. Yes, you can safely image Saturn for 6 mins.
I imaged with all the Toucams for about 2 years I think it was, then upgraded to the DBK. I most definitely am producing better results now compared to the 900nc results I used to get. It's mainly about the frame rates, gain versus sensitivity & codecs. Naturally aperture plays a part, as well as optical quality but by jumping to the DBK was without doubt my biggest gain.
Hi Rob, nice shots. Probably your best so far? I reckon it's about time you got serious & bought another camera mate ;-)
Are you shooting for the 6 min. max. time? I haven't seen much of an improvement in my processing with version 6 in my experimentation, if any over version 5.1 unfortunately. I think the beauty lies in the fact that it can now MAP align with no seam lines (if you know what your doing) on moon shots.
Another camera Maybe next year John. I'm still trying to raise a 17yo daughter I only have this camera due to the generosity of Darryl (KM).
But seriously I have plans for my 10" and when it is sorted I will look at upgrading to a better camera, but due to the lack of finance it is a slow pathway
PS I think these two were 300 sec
Nice result there Clayton, looks like quite reasonable data.
Cheers
Trevor
Thanks Trevor, the seeing was kind (but not too kind) to me for a few short minutes. As usual I was a bit heavy handed with my processing. Perhaps one day I will learn to practise some restraint
Soon after 930pm however it dropped off and stayed ordinary until just before 11.30pm when I decided to pack up. It improved a bit, probably 7/10 but i was too tired to hang around. 
I only have this camera due to the generosity of Darryl (KM). 
