Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-02-2011, 06:21 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Orion wide field reprocessed

I need to get a life.

This is a reprocessed orion wide field. This time with what I believe is proper bias, dark and flat frame calibration - except that the flat is at iso 800.

Canon 1000D, 247 frames, average 15 seconds, 200mm, f/2.8 - 3.2, approx 62 minutes - unguided.

It seems to me, that without overdoing the processing, this is about what to expect from an image of this size. Maybe someone else could extract more data - histogram attached.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (orionwide.jpg)
173.6 KB68 views
Click for full-size image (histogram.jpg)
123.8 KB35 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-02-2011, 07:26 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Rowland,

Hope you don't mind, I had a two minute play in Photoshop with the attached JPG.

Note, the halo around M42 is not something that I've introduced -- it's in your data. Not sure where that's come from other than some kind of processing done in Pixinsight?

There's some data in there.

H
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (rcow.jpg)
174.0 KB62 views
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-02-2011, 08:27 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Thanks H. No problem, it's good to get a second opinion.

I have a feeling that it's a combination of the dithering issue, calibration, possibly the flat and the method of integration/pixel clipping, and the camera/sensor - or so I'm told.

I'll start again.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-02-2011, 08:43 PM
irwjager's Avatar
irwjager (Ivo)
Registered User

irwjager is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 532
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcheshire View Post
I need to get a life.
Seems to me you got a great life, practicing astronomy!

Quote:
It seems to me, that without overdoing the processing, this is about what to expect from an image of this size. Maybe someone else could extract more data - histogram attached.
I think I got a wee bit more out of the JPG, but like you, I wouldn't want to overdo it with the processing.

Nice going!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (reprocess.jpg)
198.4 KB44 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-02-2011, 05:52 AM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
That tool set is amazing Ivo. But I need to get some of the PI processes under control, particularly pixel clipping.

I found the problem. Basic really. The final combination of the exposure subsets required a different clipping algorithm. Having done that the quality of the image and any underlying problems is immediately evident in the L* channel. Unless I push it really hard, the streakyness and milky appearance is all but gone. Differential flexure is a large part of the problem, but I've managed to minimize that by integrating the images in the way that I have.

The lesson is dithering - reframing the subject periodically throughout an imaging run. This is true for unguided work, particularly with accurate polar alignment - a fluke.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement