Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 30-01-2011, 04:45 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Very nice Doug, detail, colour, focus and depth look great. Just those pesky satelites.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 30-01-2011, 08:21 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by marc4darkskies View Post
Verrry nice Doug!! An excellent rendition!

Cheers, Marcus
Thanks Marcus - nice when a new toy lives up to one's expectations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis View Post
Hi Doug

I used a custom mask designed and sourced my H0ughy for my Vixen 102mm refractor – it is a little oversize for the Canon lens but it hangs on the 400mm F5.6L lens hood by a thin foam ring that I glued onto the mask. If I remember correctly, I had to choose a bright star (at least Mag 1) and used Remote Live View fully zoomed in.

I tried the same mask on my 70-200mm F4L and had a little difficulty as the spikes were quite small in extent, but after I took a 30 second image and downloaded it, I could see that that focus was good as can be seen in the attached 40D full frame shot, down-sampled to 800x533 pixels.

I know that Ron at Sirius Optics sells Farpoint Bahtinov Masks with the smallest size covering the range 2.5" - 4.5". These have x3 locating screws at 120 degrees located in slots at the outer edge that can slide in/out radially, so the mask will fit snugly on the lens hood.

I guess that once you have used Remote Live View zoomed in, it would be best to then take say, a 5 sec shot, download it and inspect it full size to confirm best focus?

Cheers

Dennis
Cheers for the information Dennis - I will investigate further.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar View Post
Very nice Doug, detail, colour, focus and depth look great. Just those pesky satelites.
Thanks Doug - M42 seems to be a magnet for satellites.

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 30-01-2011, 09:54 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
well looks like you have a nice imaging lens
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 30-01-2011, 10:02 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
well looks like you have a nice imaging lens
Thanks Dave - yes, I landed on my feet with this one I reckon!
Cheers
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-02-2011, 01:52 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Great shot. Wealth of dark nebs in there. Nice work.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-02-2011, 02:26 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Great shot. Wealth of dark nebs in there. Nice work.
Thanks Marc - I've binned all the obvious satellite trail subs and will hopefully add to the remaining subs around the new moon if weather permits.
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-02-2011, 02:54 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Doug,

Why did you bin them? What stacking algorithm are you using?

At least in IRIS, kappa sigma stacking removes anomalies. I'm sure MaxIm's sigma clip works the same way, too.

It's too painful throwing sub-exposures out, unless the stars are uber-wonky : )

H
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-02-2011, 09:04 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
Doug,

Why did you bin them? What stacking algorithm are you using?

At least in IRIS, kappa sigma stacking removes anomalies. I'm sure MaxIm's sigma clip works the same way, too.

It's too painful throwing sub-exposures out, unless the stars are uber-wonky : )

H
C'mon H I'm a perfectionista!
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-02-2011, 09:15 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Rethink - as usual you're probably correct H

So, all is not lost - I keep the original RAWs on the camera CF card and also d/load them to the astro laptop...Belt N' Braces!!!

I'll try restacking with your suggested settings (or their ImagesPlus or Nebulosity equivalents)

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement