Quote:
Originally Posted by rcheshire
The drifting pole affects magnetic variation - basically, the difference between compass and true north.
Runways are numbered according to the magnetic bearing (in whole numbers) that is closest to the actual alignment. Evidently, the variation in that area has changed sufficiently over the years to warrant renaming it. Not unheard of.
|
Whole numbers being multiples of 10 degrees.
The busiest runway will be re-designated 19R/1L on aviation charts. It's been 18R/36L, indicating its alignment along the 180-degree approach from the north and the 360-degree approach from the south.
Later this month, the airport's east parallel runway and the seldom used east-west runway will be closed to change signage to their new designations. Tampa Tribune.
Hence the other N/S runway will become 19L/1R. It didn't say what the E/W runway currently 9/27 would be, but I guess 10/26.
The 2007 FAA diagram has the N/S runways being at 6 deg magnetic and the E/W at 96 deg magnetic so by then they already needed renumbering.
I read elsewhere that Canadian Arctic runways are labeled with true rather than magnetic bearings because magnetic ones change so fast.