ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
New Moon 0.3%
|
|

13-08-2010, 08:58 PM
|
 |
IIS Member #671
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
|
|
Paul,
Depends -- would Livinia be on? ; )
H
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCH
Imagine being the one to go. You go all that way, - spend all that time, - and when you get there, they have "Hey Hey it's frigging Saturday" on TV.
How peeved would you be 
|
|

13-08-2010, 09:00 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South Gippsland
Posts: 85
|
|
Remember Biosphere 2?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2
The logistics of space travel and distances are the least of our worries. At our present level of understanding we'll starve soon after the stored food supply is exhausted. I think the necessary understanding of biology presents a much greater challenge than the physics of space travel.
|

14-08-2010, 10:40 AM
|
 |
Stargazer
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 842
|
|
Let's just grow some green algae on mars to create makeshift oxygen and colonise there
|

14-08-2010, 11:09 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 438
|
|
Scenario: Alien ship arrives and warns out about earth destruction for reason "X", they recommend evacuation to planet "Z", not as nice as earth but better than nothing.
Do you evacuate or not?
Maybe I need to write a sci-fi short story
|

14-08-2010, 05:35 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by luigi
Scenario: Alien ship arrives and warns out about earth destruction for reason "X".
|
Alien Ship- Vogon's
Reason X - build a hyperspace bypass.
Plausible
Hicthhikers guide to the galaxy -   
|

16-08-2010, 12:43 PM
|
 |
Watcher
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Gold Coast QLD
Posts: 82
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by luigi
Scenario: Alien ship arrives and warns out about earth destruction for reason "X", they recommend evacuation to planet "Z", not as nice as earth but better than nothing.
Do you evacuate or not?
Maybe I need to write a sci-fi short story 
|
What a very interesting premise, get your pen out! Intergalactic con men!
Do you believe them, when your sun looks just fine? Maybe they sell you back the planet!!
|

16-08-2010, 05:17 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Maroochydore, Australia
Posts: 50
|
|
I read the other day that the viewable distance of our universe ( as far as out telescopes can see anyway from out vantage point on Earth) is a wopping 46 billion light years distance in any direction and space still goes on further than that! Yet the universe is only 13.7 billion years old. Its expanding faster than what light can tranverse it!
|

17-08-2010, 11:34 AM
|
 |
Watcher
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Gold Coast QLD
Posts: 82
|
|
You might find this an interesting Read Man in the Moon
Quote:
Universe Measured: We're 156 Billion Light-years Wide!
The universe is about 13.7 billion years old. Light reaching us from the earliest known galaxies has been travelling, therefore, for more than 13 billion years. So one might assume that the radius of the universe is 13.7 billion light-years and that the whole shebang is double that, or 27.4 billion light-years wide.
But the universe has been expanding ever since the beginning of time, when theorists believe it all sprang forth from an infinitely dense point in a Big Bang.
"All the distance covered by the light in the early universe gets increased by the expansion of the universe," explains Neil Cornish, an astrophysicist at Montana State University. "Think of it like compound interest."
Need a visual? Imagine the universe just a million years after it was born, Cornish suggests. A batch of light travels for a year, covering one light-year. "At that time, the universe was about 1,000 times smaller than it is today," he said. "Thus, that one light-year has now stretched to become 1,000 light-years."
All the pieces add up to 78 billion-light-years. The light has not traveled that far, but "the starting point of a photon reaching us today after travelling for 13.7 billion years is now 78 billion light-years away," Cornish said. That would be the radius of the universe, and twice that -- 156 billion light-years -- is the diameter. That's based on a view going 90 percent of the way back in time, so it might be slightly larger.
|
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ay_040524.html
Last edited by psyche101; 17-08-2010 at 11:35 AM.
Reason: spelling
|

17-08-2010, 08:46 PM
|
 |
Stargazer
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 842
|
|
|

18-08-2010, 01:08 AM
|
 |
No More Infinities
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
|
|
Quote:
All the pieces add up to 78 billion-light-years. The light has not traveled that far, but "the starting point of a photon reaching us today after travelling for 13.7 billion years is now 78 billion light-years away," Cornish said. That would be the radius of the universe, and twice that -- 156 billion light-years -- is the diameter. That's based on a view going 90 percent of the way back in time, so it might be slightly larger.
|
And to think, that's only a very small part of the overall Universe. That 156 billion light years is only what we can see within our small bubble of space. The geometry of our space is flat to within 1/10^6 of a %. How big might that make the whole universe??....probably 100's or 1000's of times larger than that still. Could even be infinite in size, we just don't know.
|

18-08-2010, 09:34 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Beaumont Hills NSW
Posts: 2,900
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised
Could even be infinite in size, we just don't know.
|
Now you are getting the picture. While ever we give the universe a finite size there is always going to be the question "what is outside this". We don't conceive infinity but we must accept it before we can progress.
We now believe that all the heavy elements are created by a supernova. It is conceivable that what we refer to as DNA is created similarly, perhaps at a "big bang". It then requires a suitable environment (egg) to generate the form of life that answers the code, and like the unstable elements above 92, is there an unstable advanced DNA that could evolve into the God that is part of our culture? Think!
Every question without answer creates more questions!
Barry
|

18-08-2010, 10:37 AM
|
 |
No More Infinities
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
|
|
I had the picture, Barry, a very long time ago
|

18-08-2010, 12:10 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dubbo
Posts: 50
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrykgerdes
We now believe that all the heavy elements are created by a supernova. It is conceivable that what we refer to as DNA is created similarly, perhaps at a "big bang".
Barry 
|
I don't think complex organic molecules and supernovas get along very well  , DNA melts around 100 degrees and we use relatively low level UV radiation to kill microorganisms.
|

18-08-2010, 12:49 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Beaumont Hills NSW
Posts: 2,900
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbo
I don't think complex organic molecules and supernovas get along very well  , DNA melts around 100 degrees and we use relatively low level UV radiation to kill microorganisms.
|
That may be so but I don't want to get into an argument about evolution. Nothing has solid form at the temperature of super novae or big bangs. It is what condenses out it that is the matter we know. DNA has no life till it has the right environment to develop life. It is just a complex key. I am just posing the questions and asking you to think of an answer.
Sherlock Holmes said " Remove the impossible then what remains is the answer no matter how improbable it seems"
Getting back to the original subject. We, as we exist will not colonise space. We only exist here because the environment we survive in is what it is. Our technology will advance and give us means to explore the local environment and probably "mine" it if we do not destroy ourselves before hand. But "Time" will stop anything greater. However we may launch an "ark'' into space that will carry the seeds of life to travel for countless aeons and maybe crash on a suitable environment where life will again develop and flourish.
Once again just think of the possibilities.
Barry
|

18-08-2010, 01:03 PM
|
 |
ze frogginator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrykgerdes
Now you are getting the picture. While ever we give the universe a finite size there is always going to be the question "what is outside this". We don't conceive infinity but we must accept it before we can progress.
|
I have a theory about infinity.
*Disclaimer
I reckon the infinitely small and the infinitely big are the same and loop somehow somewhere. We just can't see one way or the other. So there's no infinity. Everything goes round and round and round... like this  . There's no place like home right here right now
|

18-08-2010, 01:19 PM
|
 |
avandonk
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
|
|
It is true that people once thought there was an edge to the world. The so called flat earth theory. If you sailed your ship past this barrier you would fall off the earth!
We know far better now. There is an edge outside the boundary of the biosphere where we need machines to survive and support from Earth to do this for any length of time.
In my humble opinion the Universe is teeming with life and fortunately it will be a very long time before we get anywhere near them to really stuff it up as we have here. It is all too far away.
Humanity is headed for not a big bang but a pathetic whimper as the last human ponders why his I-thingy no longer works.
Bert
|

18-08-2010, 01:30 PM
|
 |
No More Infinities
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by avandonk
It is true that people once thought there was an edge to the world. The so called flat earth theory. If you sailed your ship past this barrier you would fall off the earth!
Bert
|
Unfortunately some still do subscribe to this, in its various incarnations.
|

18-08-2010, 01:51 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Beaumont Hills NSW
Posts: 2,900
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by avandonk
In my humble opinion the Universe is teeming with life and fortunately it will be a very long time before we get anywhere near them to really stuff it up as we have here. It is all too far away.
Bert
|
and because infinity means infinity there must be an infinite number of people like us out there thinking the same things. Funny thing though if there is only 1 in 1000000 possible places to support life there must be 1000000 infinities
Barry
|

18-08-2010, 02:16 PM
|
 |
Unpredictable
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,023
|
|
Not wanting to disrupt the flow of this thread (too much), we may have already colonised space unknowingly !:
NASA study will help stop stowaways to Mars
http://www.physorg.com/news107608651.html
The article talks about NASA's clean-room procedures, used when preparing interplanetary probes..
"it is extremely difficult to eliminate all dust particles and microbes without damaging the electronic instruments the process is intended to protect."
....
"Clean rooms are considered extreme environments for microbes because water and nutrients are in extremely short supply. Nevertheless, some bacteria are able to survive on what little moisture the low-humidity air provides and on trace elements in the wall paint, residue of cleaning solvents, and in the spacecraft materials, themselves."
So far, we've deposited heaps of probes throughout our solar system. One day, we might be staring into a set of green eyes we accidentally plonked on another planet !!
Cheers
PS: Sorry for the change in tack .. I'm done .. cheers.
|

18-08-2010, 02:29 PM
|
 |
No More Infinities
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrykgerdes
and because infinity means infinity there must be an infinite number of people like us out there thinking the same things. Funny thing though if there is only 1 in 1000000 possible places to support life there must be 1000000 infinities
Barry
|
Actually, no. Even if there were only 1/1000000 places that supported life, the fact that there are an infinity of them still makes that number an infinity. The infinite subset of an infinite number is still an infinite number. They're practically the same size, no matter how much you care to divide them
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:53 PM.
|
|