Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 18-04-2010, 11:37 AM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
I agree Malcolm but we've gotta start somewhere
The fuse could be in the cigarette lighter plug.
Over to Eric....
Give us some numbers on components please Eric

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 18-04-2010, 11:53 AM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
If it helps make sense, I've straightened erick's photos, flipped the track side to match the components and overlaid then.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Controller-comp.jpg)
113.7 KB32 views
Click for full-size image (Controller-track.jpg)
114.7 KB21 views
Click for full-size image (Controller.jpg)
110.3 KB23 views
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 18-04-2010, 12:24 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
Good photo D3 is across the rail "BAD". Symptom blown 555. possible cause reversed at one stage blew D3 then blew 555. Still could be a zener for overvoltage protection fairly heafty diode (or Zener).

Check D3 (get the number) and replace anyway. replace 555 again if needed. Only one more component left to replace Q1. Fairly cheap items to replace, so would do them all.

Modifiaction - place inline fuse in lighter wire with god know current rating, need more testing for that.

Advice - I wouldn't buy one in the future, 2 design flaws already mentioned. (apologise for the bad)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 18-04-2010, 12:27 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by kinetic View Post
I agree Malcolm but we've gotta start somewhere
The fuse could be in the cigarette lighter plug.
Over to Eric....
Give us some numbers on components please Eric

Steve
Has been know to have a fuse, 2 things, would have blown the fuse before anything else in the past and the plug looks regular no fuse access I can see.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 18-04-2010, 10:39 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Sorry guys, have been out all day. Great work however (ps. don't you guys have lives to live?)

You were confusing me re "photo of underside of the board" - photo # 3 is it?

I took them as close as my standard lens would allow me to focus.

I bought it secondhand. I can (and have) built my own based on the Jaycar kit (KC5225) and the one from Oatley Electronics ( http://secure.oatleyelectronics.com//index.php ), the K252 which is at a great price of $18 (cf Jaycar's at $25)! I also own the best - the Thousand Oaks unit - and it is being built into my SDM.

I bought it because cheap price () and nice compact package - I end up with mine in big plastic boxes

As you see below, I already found an unsoldered leg on the output transistor and the way it operated was nothing like I expected - but it worked after soldering.

I did some more checking today when I took the photos. Fuse is accessible in the ciggie plug - unscrew the centre contact end. It is not blown, but I didn't take a note of the amperage. I'll do that tomorrow - and get the details of the components that you are requesting. I checked (metred) the power leads into the board, via the switch on the pot - all fine. I looked for any lead damage or burning - none. I looked for any possibility of loose wire touching the circuit board - none.

Have a close look at the 555 - I won't use it again. There is a heat blister in the middle of its back and it has a crack running from the #1 pin end, down the middle to the blister. It won't have survived that.

I am absolutely sure that I could not have supplied the wrong polarity. I was working with two diferent 12V batteries with hard-wired ciggie sockets and two ciggie extension leads, both of which I have used before without problems. But I will have to check the leads out. Now I recall, I used one of the leads for the rest of the night with a different controller and one of the batteries - worked fine. No, I'm convinced that what went wrong was in this Kendrick circuit.

If you see any simple sensible circuit improvements, I'll make them - eg. put a better reverse polarity protection diode in place.

After I give you more details, happy to get down to lifting and testing some components. I'd like to pull the 555, insert an IC socket, then power up without the 555 fitted - and check power supply voltages to the socket. Don't want to blow another 555 - hell, that's $1.25 into the bin!

BTW, the 555 in the circuit is labelled 5BC9TYM C555CP. I'm hoping this is just Texas Instruments' way of labelling a garden-variety 555. Jaycar can sell me just one version of a 555 - an "NE555". I have tried googling with little success, but I expect this is a drop in replacement for this circuit?

Thanks again guys - I'll study the first version of the circuit diagram.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 19-04-2010, 09:39 AM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Fuse in plug is 5A.
Q1 is marked RFZ34N R 533G amongst other random letters and marks.
D3 is IN581 (? maybe another number, but it's against the board)

I reckon that I lift and test D3. If OK, reuse, if not, replace.
Lift two legs of Q1 and check. If OK, reuse, if not replace (What would be the Jaycar replacement for Q1?)
Then remove the dead 555, replace with new 555 in socket. Power up and it will all work
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 19-04-2010, 11:38 AM
wasyoungonce's Avatar
wasyoungonce (Brendan)
Certified Village Idiot

wasyoungonce is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mexico city (Melb), Australia
Posts: 2,358
Here ya go...a cct diagram..from what my beady eyes can see.

This is a standard PWM heater design.

Obviously the 555 is dead. This is usually caused by overvoltage. D3 looks like a zener lets say 16Volts Zener. D1/D2 are IN4148's or equivalent.

The FET may have shorted gate to source (or drain). Take it out & replace the 555 & power up. If Ok it may be the FET. A replacement FET would be IRF540N from Jaycar.

Hope this helps.

edit:
opps the LED is connected to R1...I just drew it as a diode
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (kendrick dew heater image.jpg)
131.2 KB71 views
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 19-04-2010, 11:45 AM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Thank you kind sir!

I'll make a Jaycar visit later today and try to find time to fire up the soldering iron this evening.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 19-04-2010, 01:15 PM
Louwai's Avatar
Louwai (Bryan)
SDM Convert

Louwai is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by erick View Post
Thank you kind sir!

I'll make a Jaycar visit later today and try to find time to fire up the soldering iron this evening.

Do you remember a couple of yrs ago when smoke came pouring out of my kendrick ctrlr at SV Eric????

Darren fixed it.......... Did a top job...
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 19-04-2010, 01:30 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Didn't yours have + volts to the shield and - volts to the central plug on the RCA connectors?

I'm sure I checked this one and it's +ve to centre. I better check that circuit diagram again.

Edit - yes +Volts to centre of RCA.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 19-04-2010, 03:27 PM
wasyoungonce's Avatar
wasyoungonce (Brendan)
Certified Village Idiot

wasyoungonce is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mexico city (Melb), Australia
Posts: 2,358
err I should have said that if the FET was shorted to the drain then R4 would have smoked up and more than likely L1 as well.

Suspect it's just a bad 555 then.

I didn't see the 1st page drawings...slaps forehead..Do'H!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 19-04-2010, 04:57 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Woohoo, so some progress. Ahhh it WAS a FET...and Malcolm was
right too, it was a protection Zener....apologies Mal

Last edited by kinetic; 20-04-2010 at 06:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 19-04-2010, 05:34 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
No need to apologise it is entirely possible for D3 to be a rectifier diode for reverse protection as they can handle higher currents. The important thing is that Eric is one step closer to getting it fixed. Zener would need to be 15V for 12V system Although 16V might be better as long as the rest of the cct can handle that sort of ver voltage. Car alternator can go as high as 14.5V so .5V is not much of a cover. I can only assume it is primarily design for general battery operation so a Zener under 23V should be fine. 1N581 is not all the numbers so it is going to be difficult to know the exact replacment zener value is.

I won't be so quick to judge the no fuse in the design. It would be pretty hard to forget it in this design. I retract my advice on not gettting one if needed.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 19-04-2010, 06:07 PM
Louwai's Avatar
Louwai (Bryan)
SDM Convert

Louwai is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by erick View Post
Didn't yours have + volts to the shield and - volts to the central plug on the RCA connectors?

I'm sure I checked this one and it's +ve to centre. I better check that circuit diagram again.

Edit - yes +Volts to centre of RCA.
Not being overly electronic orientated Eric, I don't really know what the issue was.
But I do recall the smoke was caused by the power to the unit being turned on before all ofthe heater straps were connected & a lose strap power feed cable came in contact with the tripod......... which has the controler attached to one leg......

So a direct short I assume....
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 19-04-2010, 10:15 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
OK, I'm back in business! Thanks all.

Lifted a leg of D3 - it checked out OK. Forgot to read the full number before I resoldered it

Tried to lift Q1 but my crappy solder sucker wasn't doing a good job, so I gave up.

So I removed the 555. It came out in several pieces - it was severely cooked.

Added socket and a new 555. Very cautiously turned on - all fine. Added some load - all fine. No components heating up. Up to maximum setting - no problem. Put the oscilloscope onto the output to the load - it was behaving just as I described before. Loooooooooooooooong pulse width - seconds! At minimum setting output 12V is on for some 40% of the pulse. At maximum setting output 12V is on some 95+% of the pulse.

Ran for a while and all seemed fine. No components got even warm to touch. (the 3" dew strap was only drawing about 0.5A @ 12V).

I think it is on too long at the minimum setting. Can anyone suggest, from the circuit, which resister value I need to tweak to have it on for less of the pulse width at minimum setting - perhaps down to output on for around 15-20% of the pulse width?

Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 19-04-2010, 10:54 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
Erik, running Astable operation I would replace R2 with a trim pot of twice the value of R2. The trim pot will use only one end lead and center.
The pot value and R2 change the width state when run as a multivibrator.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 19-04-2010, 11:11 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
OK, R2 it is. I'll get onto that.

Now what is R2 - cannot work it out from the photo - grey/green orange/brown orange? I'll have to pull the lid off again. But it's definitely orange - so maybe a 50 or 100k trimpot should do the trick.

If the pot at minimum gives me about 40% on-time, then reducing R2 value should reduce that below 40%. OK, I can play with that easily and check the results on the scope.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 20-04-2010, 09:13 AM
wasyoungonce's Avatar
wasyoungonce (Brendan)
Certified Village Idiot

wasyoungonce is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mexico city (Melb), Australia
Posts: 2,358
[QUOTE=erick;583319If the pot at minimum gives me about 40% on-time, then reducing R2 value should reduce that below 40%. OK, I can play with that easily and check the results on the scope.[/QUOTE]

Eric I have played extensively with 555s PWM. The mark space ratio (range of control) is set-up by the Pot and (capacitor) Cx value. F = 1.44/(Rx * Cx).

I found if you have these wrong the PWM starts at around a duty cycle (mark space ratio) of around 40%...this is pretty much what you are seeing. Thus you have less range of control.

By changing the Rx & Cx (Pot & Capacitor) you can get this down but you also effect the PWM freq.

Since your Pot is a switch/pot you may have troubles finding a higher value pot that suits. In any case I found a pot of around 500K (& up) and a Cx value of around 1 to .3 microfarads gives a freq of oscillation of 2 to 7hz and the mark space ratio is 4.25% to 99.9% (range of control).

I can send you a spreadsheet I did on pot/Cx PWM freq & mark space ratios if you want.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 20-04-2010, 09:59 AM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
Nice work Wasyoungonce !
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 20-04-2010, 10:13 AM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
PM sent for spreadsheet, many thanks.

Don't need a switch so changing the pot is no problem.

I wouldn't mind if the PWM frequency was increased - many seconds seems odd to me compared to speed controller circuits which I have used otherwise. But I guess it is not an issue for this heating application. But 2-7Hz - easier to monitor/adjust on the oscilloscope.

Eric


Quote:
Originally Posted by wasyoungonce View Post
Eric I have played extensively with 555s PWM. The mark space ratio (range of control) is set-up by the Pot and (capacitor) Cx value. F = 1.44/(Rx * Cx).

I found if you have these wrong the PWM starts at around a duty cycle (mark space ratio) of around 40%...this is pretty much what you are seeing. Thus you have less range of control.

By changing the Rx & Cx (Pot & Capacitor) you can get this down but you also effect the PWM freq.

Since your Pot is a switch/pot you may have troubles finding a higher value pot that suits. In any case I found a pot of around 500K (& up) and a Cx value of around 1 to .3 microfarads gives a freq of oscillation of 2 to 7hz and the mark space ratio is 4.25% to 99.9% (range of control).

I can send you a spreadsheet I did on pot/Cx PWM freq & mark space ratios if you want.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement