Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-10-2009, 02:38 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
My first Helix - Widefield in Ha

After my last night runaway mount experience, I changed both RA & DEC cables and did 10x10min in Ha on the Helix. Pretty faint, so I couldn't see it and point to it in the finder, and with my legendary polar alignment and goto accuracy it only took me about 1h to find it . Tracking was good so tomorrow night I'm going to load the hyperstar with the C11 and shoot the same thing. Now I'm confident I'm not going to break anything. FOV should be similar, maybe a bit bigger but I suspect I'm going to be doing 30s to 1min subs and go to bed waaay earlier than tonight. Will be a good comparison test.

There's a full field here if anyone's interested: http://www.multiweb.com.au/astro/NGC7293_ha_f.jpg
Pretty boring grey donut without colors
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC7293_ha_cf.jpg)
190.6 KB137 views

Last edited by multiweb; 20-10-2009 at 11:11 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-10-2009, 07:08 AM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Stars look good Marc, and you've captured part of the outer viel of the nebulae. More data will help as usual, but you know that. I'd be pretty proud of that effort personally, but I'm easy to please I guess.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-10-2009, 08:27 AM
CoolhandJo's Avatar
CoolhandJo (Paul)
Registered User

CoolhandJo is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,809
Good work. This is faint (as you know) but I think the Ha you have is really good going. Will you be adding some RGB?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-10-2009, 11:09 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpastern View Post
Stars look good Marc, and you've captured part of the outer viel of the nebulae. More data will help as usual, but you know that. I'd be pretty proud of that effort personally, but I'm easy to please I guess.

Dave
Thanks David. I think this object looks way better at higher FL like what Mike Sidonio did, but I had enough hard time to find where it was.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolhandJo View Post
Good work. This is faint (as you know) but I think the Ha you have is really good going. Will you be adding some RGB?
Thanks Paul. Unlikely . Just getting the Ha was hard Yakka from where I am. Not very rewarding. I'm going to shoot the same field tonight with the C11/Hyperstar combo and compare. Unguided though as I haven't figured out how to guide the C11 with HS. Normally I use an OAG. Tonight was a test run to make sure the mount was ok with the new cables. You can see the pic is still very noisy for an hour and a half. The forecast in Sydney was clear with good seeing but I kept getting those pesky clouds coming through from the NE until I gave up around 1:00pm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-10-2009, 11:17 AM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Nice shot, Marc. The Hyperstar will certainly get that and probably more in a much shorter exposure than what you did last night. Seems the best cameras for them are OSC's, since you don't really want to start adding filter selectors and such to the weight on the front of the scope.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-10-2009, 02:48 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Thanks David. I think this object looks way better at higher FL like what Mike Sidonio did, but I had enough hard time to find where it was.
I wonder if I can see this with my 4" refractor from LP city skies (with a UHC filter)?

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-10-2009, 03:44 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Nice sharp image there.
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-10-2009, 04:20 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,280
Good One Marc

nice tracking
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-10-2009, 04:48 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Nice shot, Marc. The Hyperstar will certainly get that and probably more in a much shorter exposure than what you did last night. Seems the best cameras for them are OSC's, since you don't really want to start adding filter selectors and such to the weight on the front of the scope.
Apparently the light cone is so steep there are issues with monochrome cameras and narrowband with ghost reflections because of different focus plane per light wavelength. I read that using an OSC with microlensing acts as a secondary filter after the main filter (i.e you keep only red when doing Ha/Sii and the reflections end up in the green and blue that you discard anyway). But on a monochrome it all ends up in the same well. I'll be able to confirm this tonight as I'm shooting the Helix in Ha, if everything works that is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpastern View Post
I wonder if I can see this with my 4" refractor from LP city skies (with a UHC filter)?

Dave
Can't see why not but it's bloody faint.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tornado33 View Post
Nice sharp image there.
Scott
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
Good One Marc

nice tracking
Thanks guys. Sharp alright but still lacks details. I don't know if it's shortage of data or aperture. We'll see what the C11 at F/2 does tonight. I'm excited.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-10-2009, 05:29 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Can't see why not but it's bloody faint.
Well, the powerpoint presentation that Mike put up on targets for small scopes seems to imply that it should be. Might just have to go looking for it.

I strongly resisted the urge today to get the scope out (I stayed home ill from work) and test my solar setup.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 20-10-2009, 05:41 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Marc, Looks good mate...

I got $10 says that the C11 + HS pulls out more nebulosity in 10x1min subs than this image got in 10x10min... Once and for all throwing the idea that F ratio and aperture do not make much difference for imaging...

This however, is very nice, Much nicer in fact than any helix shot I've done to date.. I find the helix a real pain in the bum to image.. I've attempted it 3 times now, each time I've failed miserably.. Good luck to you mate!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20-10-2009, 06:32 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Marc, Looks good mate...

I got $10 says that the C11 + HS pulls out more nebulosity in 10x1min subs than this image got in 10x10min... Once and for all throwing the idea that F ratio and aperture do not make much difference for imaging...

This however, is very nice, Much nicer in fact than any helix shot I've done to date.. I find the helix a real pain in the bum to image.. I've attempted it 3 times now, each time I've failed miserably.. Good luck to you mate!
Thanks Alex. All set up now. No turning back now. Fans are on, mirror cooling. The only thing I'm worried about a bit is fogging up the QHY8 as it's pointing down. I have put a null adapter (empty nosepiece) and screwed it directly into the hyperstar adapter. It's sealed by the Baader Ha filter on the other side. So the distance between the Ha filter glass and the CCD is actually less than the standard nosepiece length, so there's less air trapped into it too.... we'll see.... oh, and I blew dry the hell out of it too in the bathroom prior. At this stage I'm not even worried about collimation. I wanna shoot "something", anything will do. If I can focus, close enough - all good
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 20-10-2009, 07:03 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Thats the way mate! Image or Bust! haha

I think you'll find it will be OK with the QHY8 pointed down... worst comes to worst, a small dew heater band wrapped around the the null adapter will stop any dewing issues... although thats just one more cable hanging through the light path... You could also get very small sillica gel pouch from jaycar or somewhere similar and fit that somewhere inside the QHY8 to suck up moisture... I've seen that done before... worked well...

I agree, tonight, worry less about collimation, worry more about getting some data, even if the stars are a little out of shape, it will still be interesting to see how much light it sucks in... Tackle collimation and other required adjustments next time!

Have fun mate.. Have fun!!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 20-10-2009, 07:40 PM
Bolts_Tweed (Mark)
Registered User

Bolts_Tweed is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Banora Point NSW
Posts: 480
Dave you should get it from home with a UHC. I have got it from the Gold Coast with a 4 inch refractor and DSLR (350D).

Dont know about the outlying second ring but. That is the big difference with Marcs image (what i think makes it so good) compared to the usual rubbish helix I take. You might get it but you'll have to push it.

For inspiration - Eddie Trimachis site show what can be done suburbia and he is just north of Surfers Paradise.

Well worth trying mate

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 20-10-2009, 08:29 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Nice image Marc, looking forward to seeing the hyper image.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 20-10-2009, 08:35 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolts_Tweed View Post
Dave you should get it from home with a UHC. I have got it from the Gold Coast with a 4 inch refractor and DSLR (350D).
All things going well, this weekend then.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 20-10-2009, 08:50 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Thats the way mate! Image or Bust! haha

I think you'll find it will be OK with the QHY8 pointed down... worst comes to worst, a small dew heater band wrapped around the the null adapter will stop any dewing issues... although thats just one more cable hanging through the light path... You could also get very small sillica gel pouch from jaycar or somewhere similar and fit that somewhere inside the QHY8 to suck up moisture... I've seen that done before... worked well...

I agree, tonight, worry less about collimation, worry more about getting some data, even if the stars are a little out of shape, it will still be interesting to see how much light it sucks in... Tackle collimation and other required adjustments next time!

Have fun mate.. Have fun!!
Mate, I'm shooting 30s subs unguided everywhere coz I was too lazy polar aligning and setting up the guider. I just grab the C11 by the handle, point with the finder and crank 20 subs in Neb2. I did 20x30s on M8 and I have more data in Ha than the 3h I did with my 5" newt. And I'm not even trying . I'm running quickly out of Hard drive space as the subs pour in. This is madness . I'm going to have stuff to process for the next two weeks at least Feels like cheating, big time... nah ... almost I'm goona wait for the HH to popup over the roof and try there. Man, you guys gotta get yourself one of those HS.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 20-10-2009, 08:57 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
Thats awesome Marc !!!! The way your going we will have to throw a bucket of cold water over you

Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Mate, I'm shooting 30s subs unguided everywhere coz I was too lazy polar aligning and setting up the guider. I just grab the C11 by the handle, point with the finder and crank 20 subs in Neb2. I did 20x30s on M8 and I have more data in Ha than the 3h I did with my 5" newt. And I'm not even trying . I'm running quickly out of Hard drive space as the subs pour in. This is madness . I'm going to have stuff to process for the next two weeks at least Feels like cheating, big time... nah ... almost I'm goona wait for the HH to popup over the roof and try there. Man, you guys gotta get yourself one of those HS.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 20-10-2009, 08:59 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
If that doesn't sound like a glowing review I dont know what does..

"This is madness" being my favourite bit... Thats exactly what I wanted to hear...

From what I'd heard from people in the states, you can do a months worth of targets in one night with the right camera and the hyperstar...

Looks like im going to be looking for an 8" SCT and an small, sensitive camera in the not too distant future!

Great to hear its going nuts.. and I eagerly await the images...

Next time, dont be so lazy, align it, guide it, 20 minute subs on a nice dim target.. .. Im pretty sure Cent A rises in the next few months... Time to challenge Mr Sidonio to an Cent A - Off.. Go deep son!! Go DEEEEEEEPP!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 20-10-2009, 09:07 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
I won't be guiding tonight. I'd have to sticky tape my QHY5 to the finder. But I'll post some pics soon. I just finished processing quickly the M8 widefield. 20x30s so 10min all up. You're not gonna believe it when you see it. Problem now for me is going to be that the data is coming in faster than I can process it.

Here it is: 20x30s unguided. The HS is not collimated and focus is eyeballed. So you can see the potential
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (HS_M8.jpg)
193.0 KB75 views

Last edited by multiweb; 20-10-2009 at 09:12 PM. Reason: Picture added
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement