Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Terrestrial Photography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-10-2009, 10:46 PM
Lumen Miner's Avatar
Lumen Miner (Mitchell)
Registered User

Lumen Miner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beecroft, Sydney
Posts: 825
Sydney Panorama

Hi all! Decided to try and find a high point to shoot Sydney from. This is taken from Thompson's corner just about the highest point in Sydney. The view is South South East, towards the city.

It consists of six a shots, with the 200mm Canon lens at full zoom stitched together.

I was suprised at the detail of the Bridge, Center point and the Opera house.


Thanks for looking!!


Edit~ Bugger, the 1.7mb file has heaps more detail. This is not such a good rendition.. Sorry.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Finished.jpg)
255.4 KB47 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-10-2009, 10:50 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
Excelling panorama mate !Keep the good stuff coming.......
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-10-2009, 11:04 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
That's a good panorama, although I'd crop out that tree on the right hand side. Pity about the smog

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-10-2009, 11:14 PM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
Nice job Mitchell. When shooting panos the general rule is to have 1/3 frame overlap. I would have thought at 200mm you'd need a few more frames.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-10-2009, 11:15 PM
Lumen Miner's Avatar
Lumen Miner (Mitchell)
Registered User

Lumen Miner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beecroft, Sydney
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpastern View Post
That's a good panorama, although I'd crop out that tree on the right hand side. Pity about the smog

Dave
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidU View Post
Excelling panorama mate !Keep the good stuff coming.......
Thanks Dave and David.

Yes the smog is terrible!! Not as bad as it looks though. In the higher res version, you can almost make out the individual bricks on the Bridges pillars.
I think I might take you up on cropping that tree.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-10-2009, 11:18 PM
Lumen Miner's Avatar
Lumen Miner (Mitchell)
Registered User

Lumen Miner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beecroft, Sydney
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by mithrandir View Post
Nice job Mitchell. When shooting panos the general rule is to have 1/3 frame overlap. I would have thought at 200mm you'd need a few more frames.
Oh really? 1/3 you say? Why is that? I have been only overlapping maybe 1/10, I was assuming the smaller the better. I shall try 1/3 next time. Thanks mate!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-10-2009, 12:02 AM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
I've heard 1/3 cropping overlap too.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-10-2009, 08:18 AM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumen Miner View Post
Oh really? 1/3 you say? Why is that? I have been only overlapping maybe 1/10, I was assuming the smaller the better. I shall try 1/3 next time. Thanks mate!
The extra overlap lets the pano software (or your eye if you are doing it by hand) find more alignment points. In scenes like yours that probably isn't that important because you have sharp contrasts and less distortion with the longer focal length.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-10-2009, 09:09 AM
Lumen Miner's Avatar
Lumen Miner (Mitchell)
Registered User

Lumen Miner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beecroft, Sydney
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by mithrandir View Post
The extra overlap lets the pano software (or your eye if you are doing it by hand) find more alignment points. In scenes like yours that probably isn't that important because you have sharp contrasts and less distortion with the longer focal length.
Oh! Tops! I will use that rule from now on thanks. This is my first pano which has actually turned out alright. Previously my seems were not acceptable, in the slightest.

I would like to go back and redo this in the afternoon orange light, then later at night with the lights of the city... I would assume the 1/3 will be helpful especially on the night shot...

Thanks!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-10-2009, 05:41 PM
StephenM's Avatar
StephenM (Stephen)
Registered User

StephenM is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,399
Looks great Mitchell. I'll have to try doing one of these!

Cheers,
Stephen
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-10-2009, 06:37 PM
Jeffkop's Avatar
Jeffkop (Jeff)
Star-Fishing

Jeffkop is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tuckurimba
Posts: 885
Awesome ... came up a treat
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement