ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Last Quarter 45%
|
|

24-06-2009, 06:21 PM
|
 |
Astrolounge
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
|
|
Aperture Apathy
as opposed to aperture fever. we all l am sure had the fever at some time but l was wondering if some of you like me have actually downsized in favour of more mangeable scopes and maybe better quality.
ln my case using smaller higher quality scopes and in the case of astrophotography not overloading my mount it has made it much more pleasant on those dark nights.
|

24-06-2009, 06:28 PM
|
 |
Scotland to Australia
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,645
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick pinner
as opposed to aperture fever. we all l am sure had the fever at some time but l was wondering if some of you like me have actually downsized in favour of more mangeable scopes and maybe better quality.
ln my case using smaller higher quality scopes and in the case of astrophotography not overloading my mount it has made it much more pleasant on those dark nights.
|
i hear you, and i guess the things i really use the most are an ST80 on a tripod, or just my binocs, so it makes sense.
Then again, i have incredibly small genitalia, and want the biggest phallic optical object i can get my hands on
|

24-06-2009, 06:30 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
|
|
I sold my 10" dob to finance the purchase of my ed80.
I'm hoping to upgrade to an VC200L soon.
|

24-06-2009, 06:34 PM
|
 |
Duncan
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weipa FNQld
Posts: 1,091
|
|
Hi Mick,
Not really sure if i fit into this one. However i've just purchased a skywatcher SW1200 (150x1200) refractor off a fellow ice member.
I own a 12" Dob.
This latest investment is for use in Weipa where i work,Supposedly 4 weeks on 1 week off (LMAO).
In a couple of weeks i'll buy a HEQPRO5 to mount it on.
Planetary and lunar work mainly but who knows?
I guess yes it is certainly more portable but it is still a big scope in that this one is a refractor. I cant wait to see how it compares to the 12" mirror.Anyway a few more weeks till i find out i guess. Lovely clear skies up here during the dry season and best of all a BALMY 22Degrees C. overnight,LOL.
Cheers,
Duncan
|

24-06-2009, 07:15 PM
|
 |
Narrowfield rules!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
|
|
|

24-06-2009, 07:37 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
|
|
I supposE I have done just that although not so much downsizing in appature but moving down in focal length. I have made this move to firstly provide myself with a range of focal lengths which covers quite a wide span and moved to more astrophotography specific scope or scopes as it may be. I think it does take some time to really make up your mind which form of astronomy you persue. Then move through quite a few scopes until you get what you find the best for your job at hand. In some cases the advise you getisn't always correct or we may missinterpret advise.
|

24-06-2009, 07:43 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
|
|
Yep, me as well. Have a wonderful 80mm apo refractor for imaging, as well as a stunning M703 Maksutov which is imaging as I type.
While I don't, both could easily fit on the mount at the same time.
Gary
|

24-06-2009, 07:44 PM
|
 |
Narrowfield rules!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
|
|
Nah, your rambling Doug, not working
|

24-06-2009, 07:45 PM
|
 |
daniel
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
|
|
I have downsizedin - went from 66cm WO to 4.5" newt to 5" intes mak to 6" xlt and have traded them all for 4" vixen reflect on old mount with 1" focuser and some really good 70mm binos. enjoy shorter viewing & convenience
I got an ASV 8" dob - to see what everyone was crapping on about & after using it 2 times would not get one if u paid me - too hard to carry outside/bulky/heavy & i wasn't that impressed by the extra aperture
|

24-06-2009, 07:52 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar
and moved to more astrophotography specific scope or scopes as it may be. I think it does take some time to really make up your mind which form of astronomy you persue. Then move through quite a few scopes until you get what you find the best for your job at hand. .
|
Yep, well said.
The next scope I purchase should be the last one I need to buy.
|

24-06-2009, 07:56 PM
|
 |
Narrowfield rules!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjjnettie
The next scope I purchase should be the last one I need to buy.
|
Good luck Jeanette    
|

24-06-2009, 08:19 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
|
Why do you laugh Fred?
I said "need" to buy not "want" to buy.
There's a subtle but distinct difference.
|

24-06-2009, 08:38 PM
|
 |
Narrowfield rules!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
|
|
No one "needs" to buy anything in Astrophography Jeanette, its all "want" (well, In my experience). I was kidding, sorry to offend.
|

24-06-2009, 09:39 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
No one "needs" to buy anything in Astrophography Jeanette, its all "want" (well, In my experience). I was kidding, sorry to offend.
|
And no offence taken Fred.
Just funning with you.
|

24-06-2009, 11:12 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
|
|
Nah the larger the better the resolution. Mind you I have a few scopes. One for wide field, one for guiding, one for planetary, one for solar, and one for narrow field. Yep one for every purpose. Bigger is always better for imaging. Just get a larger mount to carry everything guys and gals.
Not an advocate for down sizing at all.
|

24-06-2009, 11:33 PM
|
 |
The sky is Messier here!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Darwin
Posts: 2,587
|
|
Hmm, much to my wife's consternation I'm eyeing off large Obsession style light buckets, either to build or buy 
She doesn't quite understand that the small dob, refractor and binoculars each have their specific role  I'm all for "right-sizing"
|

24-06-2009, 11:45 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick pinner
l was wondering if some of you like me have actually downsized in favour of more mangeable scopes and maybe better quality.
|
Yes I have - in short these days my stargazing time is very limited and after a long break from the hobby, when i decided to get back into its, it was just for a little visual fun, nothing too serious, and I would much rather have something enjoyable and convenient at the upper end of "Grab & Go" yet able to give fine lunar & planetary images.
Having had several 8" scopes and a 12" Newtonian long ago I'm now using a 4" f/7 refractor on an altaz mount (the grab & go) and a 180mm Mak on a Vixen SXW mount for lunar & planetary. Quick and easy and a pleasure to use.
I'd love a larger scope but I think that will have to wait till I have the time to use it.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:58 AM.
|
|