Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-05-2009, 10:42 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
M8, M16, M20 and M83 - ST9 + RC

Last night was amazingly clear and dew free here in brisbane. I took advantage of this situation and invited Robin (Tandum) over for a night of imaging...

I managed to get these four images which are a damn sight better than last weeks efforts with this scope.. Collimation looks a lot better, as does the focus.. I definitely think there is more in it however!

M8 - 60x1min @ 13nm Ha
M16 - 80x1min @ 13nm Ha
M20 - 40x1min
M83 - 33x1min

The M83 image looks a little strange, It was the first image for the night and it was after this image that I pulled my desicant cap out and stuck it in the oven, and replaced it with my refillable unit from PWT. After this the resulting images were a lot sharper...

One thing is for sure, I need a bahtinov mask for my RC.. After using Robin's one I realised that my initial focus was always out by a whisker or two.. So I think fixing that is the way to go!!

Thanks for looking... Oh, the other pics are shots of our setups all ready for the night...
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M8_05-16-09.jpg)
140.3 KB342 views
Click for full-size image (M16_05-16-09.jpg)
101.1 KB309 views
Click for full-size image (M20_05-16-09.jpg)
134.7 KB286 views
Click for full-size image (M83_05-16-09.jpg)
116.7 KB313 views
Click for full-size image (RC_Setup.jpg)
190.5 KB95 views
Click for full-size image (DSC_0391.jpg)
188.7 KB97 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-05-2009, 10:50 AM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Great pics Alex.
Here's hoping the weather stays good for next weekend. I'd love to see the new scope.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-05-2009, 10:52 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Thanks JJJ,

Yep my fingers are crossed! I cant wait to give it a fly under darker skies!
Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-05-2009, 10:55 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Much better images Alex. The eagle looks pretty good for focus.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-05-2009, 11:09 AM
spacezebra's Avatar
spacezebra (Petra)
Lost in Namibia

spacezebra is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Albury NSW
Posts: 3,134
Hi Alex

Excellent images, an amazing amount of detail.

Cheers Petra d.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-05-2009, 11:38 AM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
They look fine to me Alex.

With regards to focusing if you are using a ST-9, I assume you have CCDops software. Try using planet mode on a roughly focused star between 200-250 counts.

I find this far more accurate than any form of diffraction focusing.

Regards

Steven
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-05-2009, 11:46 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Thanks for the comments! I really enjoyed taking the shots, so Im glad people are getting some enjoyment looking at them!

Steven - Im using CCDSoft v5 for capture, however I do have CCDOps.. Might have to give that method try... Thanks for the tip!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-05-2009, 11:47 AM
vash's Avatar
vash (Ashley)
Registered User

vash is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 420
Almost there on some of them, I'd agree that eagle has the best focus a lot sharper and tighter stars than the others.

I too am hoping for dark skies, but judging by the out look, it's not that good this week.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-05-2009, 01:14 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Oh, I forgot to mention..

Auto-Darks used.
15x Bias frames.
No flats... Didnt really see the need..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17-05-2009, 02:23 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Looking good Alex - agree about the focus, but still, very nice. I'd love to see what this setup can do under dark skies and with perfect focus and really long exposures and lots of subs.

Where abouts in Brissie are you? Wouldn't mind catching up one day.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-05-2009, 02:33 PM
trick's Avatar
trick
Registered User

trick is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Last night was amazingly clear and dew free here in brisbane. I took advantage of this situation and invited Robin (Tandum) over for a night of imaging...

I managed to get these four images which are a damn sight better than last weeks efforts with this scope.. Collimation looks a lot better, as does the focus.. I definitely think there is more in it however!

M8 - 60x1min @ 13nm Ha
M16 - 80x1min @ 13nm Ha
M20 - 40x1min
M83 - 33x1min

The M83 image looks a little strange, It was the first image for the night and it was after this image that I pulled my desicant cap out and stuck it in the oven, and replaced it with my refillable unit from PWT. After this the resulting images were a lot sharper...

One thing is for sure, I need a bahtinov mask for my RC.. After using Robin's one I realised that my initial focus was always out by a whisker or two.. So I think fixing that is the way to go!!

Thanks for looking... Oh, the other pics are shots of our setups all ready for the night...
Great shots Alex, I am with you on the bahtinov mask, mine is in the post from England. With it and more care on setting up my mount I hope to improve my images.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 17-05-2009, 02:43 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Great start with the new gear Alex - its been a long time coming but I agree the conditions last night were the best for a while. The setup looks nice and neat - what's in the box below the mount?

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17-05-2009, 02:51 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Is there any reason for buying the bahtinov mask, when it's possible to make one? Excuse my silly question ;-)

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17-05-2009, 03:03 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Peter - the box below the mount houses 240v AC to 13.8v DC transformer for powering the mount, dew control gear etc. sitting atop the box is the power box for the SBIG and the SBIG guiding relay..

David - Yeah, Laziness is the reason for buying one when you can make them yourself
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17-05-2009, 03:13 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Good shots Alex. The stars could use slight tightening I think. It looks just oof to me..

The use of such numerous short exposures has delivered very smooth graduations though, excellent work.

I noticed your power cable is running parallel to your signal cable on your CCD camera. Has this ever posed a problem for you and created artifacts in your subs? I found that sometimes mine came out with diagonal banding and all-sorts until I separated the two and put an end to that problem.

I like your images mate, keep 'em comin'.

Baz.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17-05-2009, 03:40 PM
trick's Avatar
trick
Registered User

trick is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpastern View Post
Is there any reason for buying the bahtinov mask, when it's possible to make one? Excuse my silly question ;-)

Dave
Dave I find the older I get the less petience I have for fiddly things and sharp objects. For $21.75 free worldwide postage. Why not
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17-05-2009, 03:43 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Thanks Baz, I've never had a problem with the DC power lead running parallel with the signal lead on either this camera, nor my old QHY8.. I have read before that some people have those sorts of problems, however I guess I've just been lucky..

I'll have a go at reprocessing these shots with fresh eyes in a couple of days to see what I can do with regards to tightening the stars a little.. Although I do think its more an affect of poor focus than processing downfall... Time will tell..

Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17-05-2009, 04:00 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Cool series of pics. I like M16 best. Your camera sticks out a fair bit out at the back. Do you get flexure problems on your focuser?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17-05-2009, 04:29 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
My focuser flexture problems are less than most people with this scope.. Mostly due to the fact that my focuser is only racked out 14mm to reach focus.. Also, the effect of the focuser slop is lessened by the fairly small sensor in my ST9E... Yes, it does droop a little bit, although I've found having the focuser positioned upside down as seen in the pics with the locking screw tightly secured, it can be minimised to a useable level... A feathertouch motorised focuser is on its way from the states to rectify the problem completely...

Thanks for your comment Marc, I agree, M16 is the best of the bunch, Although I do really think the M8 image has potential to with some time spent reprocessing it..

Cheers.
Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 17-05-2009, 05:36 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by trick View Post
Dave I find the older I get the less petience I have for fiddly things and sharp objects. For $21.75 free worldwide postage. Why not
Just was curious. I'm probably lazy enough to buy it as well lol.

Dave
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement