Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #81  
Old 18-03-2009, 10:56 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Where's the data from this instrument Theo? You can only go visual for so long, given this is after all an imaging rig. Wack a fat internet pipe into it, define a rate per hour and provide me with your BSB and Account# for some online time. Lets see what it can do...
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 18-03-2009, 11:02 PM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
This one huge scope and I'm hoping it's not sitting in the middle of suburbia.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 19-03-2009, 12:18 AM
Gama's Avatar
Gama
Registered User

Gama is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by jase View Post
Where's the data from this instrument Theo? You can only go visual for so long, given this is after all an imaging rig. Wack a fat internet pipe into it, define a rate per hour and provide me with your BSB and Account# for some online time. Lets see what it can do...
Well, its been an uphill battle lately.

Just as i completed setting up the telescope, we of course had the sad event of the fires. This caused 2 problems for me.
the first is the skies were all smoke infested and visability was poor at best.
Add to that, im contracted for a company that maintains the Broadcasting networks like ABC and SBS radio and TV.
So when we lost Marysville and Mt Tassie (near Tralagon) sites, there was a heap of work to be done to restore all services.

Then once this slowly cleared, i started to get into imaging.
I had some teething problems with the guiding, as i was used to using a OAG, so now that i have the guide scope, i thought i'd try and use it.
Oh man, i had troubles with it, always produced egg stars or slightly worse.
I figured it must have been the difference in focal lengths of the two and the inability for the guide scope to be able to detect the fine movement at 500mm focal length as apposed to the 3500mm focal length of the CDK.
So i mounted a 150mm f12 Mak on its back, but everything was too dark and hard to find a guide star. Man, what else i thought, but while talking to a customer of mine and a IIS regular, he told me he's using a similar difference in focal lengths, but he was getting nice round stars.
I first thought he was a little daft, but he seemed to be confident about what he was saying. Then when comparing his settings on PHD, i found the cause of my problems.
Because my previous imaging was done at a much lower focal length, i adjusted the step size accordingly (700ms), and as you can already imagine, its way way too much for the higher focal length im now using. So i adjusted it to 100ms, and bingo.
So technically i have just started to take images.
I just took some raw shots of NGC 2613 and have yet to do any processing.
Of course, now its overcast.

Theo.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 19-03-2009, 12:24 AM
Gama's Avatar
Gama
Registered User

Gama is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tandum View Post
This one huge scope and I'm hoping it's not sitting in the middle of suburbia.
Well, outer suburbia.
But still crappy at times.

Oh well, not as lucky as some.

Theo
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 19-03-2009, 04:35 PM
Gama's Avatar
Gama
Registered User

Gama is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,121
Heres a RAW 2 minute alignment test exposure of NGC2613. Nice round stars to the edge.
Of course when i was ready to take exposures the clouds rolled in.

Theo
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC-2613.jpg)
182.1 KB109 views
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 22-03-2009, 11:49 PM
Gama's Avatar
Gama
Registered User

Gama is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,121
Spent a couple of minutes doing a little processing.
Not worth anything, just wanted to see the galaxy and how it looked more than anything.
Image is pretty bad, as some frames had clouds roll thru them, plus the glow of the town lights giving me terrible gradients.
Anyway, the galaxy looks ok, given only 65 minutes of total light (13x5minute), didnt set the QHY-8 gain and offset properly, so image is a little darker than i like, plus no flats or darks either.

Theo.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC 2613 .jpg)
195.9 KB123 views
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 23-03-2009, 07:13 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Looks very promising indeed Theo. Some nice detail in the galaxy and I like the second galaxy just off to the right. Imagine what this scope could do with a mono camera with a good set of filters. Looking forward to many more images.

Ciao Mark
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 23-03-2009, 09:34 PM
Gama's Avatar
Gama
Registered User

Gama is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,121
I thought the same. The mono camera is really going to make a difference.
Maybe this time i can keep one rather than sell it.
Should be even better if the conditions were better too.
The moon is gone now, so worth time imaging now.

Theo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement