Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12-10-2008, 07:42 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Does anyone process subs before stacking!!??

Hello all...
Prior to stacking a set of subs in Images Plus, I will check each sub for focus and tracking errors.

Do any of you perform a pre-stack regime on each sub?
Like a sharpen or star minimization?

Wondered if there may be benefit in doing this?

Cheers
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-2008, 07:53 PM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,631
No, no sharpening or anything else on subs pre stacking.
Only check for tracking errors/focus etc.
Stack the calibrated frames then proceed with post processing the stacked subs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2008, 08:06 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,801
No Mate, other than chucking out the bad ones, leave them as they are, well that is what I do.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2008, 09:00 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,820
Just Darks and Flats for each sub frame before the final Align & Combine.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16-10-2008, 02:25 PM
centroid (Dave)
Registered User

centroid is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 41
Yep, as the guys have said:

Calibrate all subs first (dark and or flat subtraction etc), align, then finally combine.

All processing is then done on the resulting combined image.

In the case of 'Single Shot' colour images:

Calibrate, de-Bayer (colour synthesis), align, combine, then process.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-10-2008, 02:50 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Pre-processing of subs via sharpening or deconvolution!!!! Quick everyone, grab him!! He is a heretic and must be burned at the stake!!! Outrageous!!



Generally no Doug, but if you are only doing it for the effect and not trying to obtain "scientific info" then give it a go, you never know. Keep the decon very light though.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-10-2008, 03:36 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders] View Post
Pre-processing of subs via sharpening or deconvolution!!!! Quick everyone, grab him!! He is a heretic and must be burned at the stake!!! ..................
is this an example of HOT pixels
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16-10-2008, 10:06 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,280
Theres another issue here as well, such as darks and flats what need is there to do these on the mount at the same time you do the lights if you can simulate the temperature etc then these can be done indoors.

Likewise DSS will stack images of different exposures and ISO settings. So Dougie if at the end of the day it improves the resulting image why not do it in my opinion but how should I know I'm just a novice.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16-10-2008, 10:12 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Reason I started this thread was because I had the vague recollection of a thread/post in which jase described a pre-processing regime.
Might be barking up the wrong tree or mis-remembering(!), but it stuck in the back of my mind.

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16-10-2008, 10:23 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
Theres another issue here as well, such as darks and flats what need is there to do these on the mount at the same time you do the lights if you can simulate the temperature etc then these can be done indoors.


Me, being a relative novice compared to some of the imaging experts here
Trevor, I wouldn't take this as gospel , but....

I do believe that it's a good idea to do the darks/flats at the scene of the
crime so to speak purely because the environment that is generating the
electronic noise in your webcam/ dslr /induced into any cabling etc is
better compensated and eliminated by a perfectly matched sub taken
in the same noise environment.
That's the experience I have had with years of modified webcams anyway.

regards,
Steve B.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 20-10-2008, 12:41 AM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugnsuz View Post
Reason I started this thread was because I had the vague recollection of a thread/post in which jase described a pre-processing regime.
Might be barking up the wrong tree or mis-remembering(!), but it stuck in the back of my mind.

Doug
Yes Doug.
Apply darks, flats and bias frames (the latter is required if you're scaling your darks). Then, hot and dead pixel removal, this cleans up what the darks may have left behind. Register/align each sub (per channel), then blink them. This is important as it allows you to evaluate the sub quality along with any potential discoveries (we are forever hopeful). Remove the subs that show less desirable features i.e. star FWHM or HFD too high. With the remaining excellent subs, stack/combine them. No an advanced routine, but something that has stuck with me over the journey of imaging.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20-10-2008, 11:08 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by jase View Post
Yes Doug.
Apply darks, flats and bias frames (the latter is required if you're scaling your darks). Then, hot and dead pixel removal, this cleans up what the darks may have left behind. Register/align each sub (per channel), then blink them. This is important as it allows you to evaluate the sub quality along with any potential discoveries (we are forever hopeful). Remove the subs that show less desirable features i.e. star FWHM or HFD too high. With the remaining excellent subs, stack/combine them. No an advanced routine, but something that has stuck with me over the journey of imaging.
Cheers jase, glad you found your way to this thread to clear this up.
Thanks
Doug
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement