Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-10-2008, 04:29 PM
deadsimple's Avatar
deadsimple (Ash)
Registered User

deadsimple is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 180
Smile First light: Jupiter (GRS) - 2008/10/03

Alright, I've had my telescope for 2 weeks now and my new SPC900NC arrived yesterday (thanks AlexN for the advice!) - so I had my first serious attempt at astrophotography last night, so you'll have to excuse the crap quality .. I'm just learning

Setup:
  • 8" f/6 Dobsonian (so untracked)
  • SPC900NC (unmodified)
  • Cheap 2x Bintel Barlow
  • Shutter: 1/33 exposure (I think?)
  • Framerate: 5fps
  • Everything else: as recommended by the tutorials here
  • Processed in Registax and GIMP (sharpened and slightly enlarged)
Took a few movies of Jupiter but got the best and stacked/waveletted it (see below). I'm pretty happy to have captured the GRS on the first attempt as I've never been able to see it by eye.

Any suggestions? The colours aren't perfect (I didn't bother playing with the colour settings on my first run), and I had quite a lot of stiction trying to adjust the azimuth ... need to modify the Dob base - registax had a lot of difficulty tracking the zigzag pattern of Jupiter.

Two questions for those with more experience:
  1. Does it make sense to rotate the camera so that the object of interest travels horizontally across the camera image as opposed to diagonally? I could probably squeeze more frames out of the object that way
  2. Is 5 or 10fps better in general? In daylight they both look completely identical (15fps is the first noticeable jump) .. but would double the number of medium-quality frames be better than a regular number of high quality ones when it comes to stacking?
Cheers.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-10-2008, 05:05 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
very good for a first attempt Ash, lots of encouragement to keep at it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-10-2008, 05:47 PM
cookie8's Avatar
cookie8 (Vincent)
Hooked since Halley's

cookie8 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Baulkham Hills,NSW
Posts: 790
Good effort Ash for 1st attempt considering no tracking and only 2x Barlow! It's always exciting to see GRS for the first time isn't it?
Jupiter is now 3 months past opposition and appears smaller by the day.Won't be long before we can't image Jupiter anymore this year.Keep it up you can only improve now. The next thing is tracking by either equatorial mount or EQ platform so you can take much longer video and a 5X Powermate to increase image scale.
Iceman suggested 5fps only when seeing is excellent. Use 10fps otherwise.
If object drift diagonally across FOV then you can take a slightly longer avi therefore more frames to stack.
Practice on the moon's craters after first quarter and get ready for Saturn in Dec.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-10-2008, 03:58 PM
deadsimple's Avatar
deadsimple (Ash)
Registered User

deadsimple is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 180
Thanks guys. Unfortunately an EQ mount isn't financially possible at the moment, maybe next year - so I'll have to squeeze as much out of the Dob as possible.

I've already fixed the protruding-nail teflon on the Alt controls and loosened the spring connectors, will probably grab some weights if I decide to unspring it completely. I've chamfered the Az teflon and about to grab some sliders for the base. Hopefully the next manual-tracking session won't be as jerky after these changes .. it was close to impossible tracking Jupiter with so much resistance and overshoot!

Now to figure out why the camera drivers crash my PC.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-10-2008, 12:50 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Sorry I missed this thread earlier Ash... I just followed the link from your most recent image.

For a first attempt, untracked, I would have been STOKED with a result like that... mine was more of a redish circle with some slightly lighter bands in it.. Yours on the other hand has come out quite nicely indeed.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-10-2008, 08:52 PM
deadsimple's Avatar
deadsimple (Ash)
Registered User

deadsimple is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 180
Thanks for the words of encouragement Alex.

It's funny how on my very first attempt with almost completely random camera settings (colour, shutter, gamma, etc), no hartmann-mask assisted focusing, an aborted mirror cool-down sequence (I wanted to take photos ASAP), hasty post-processing .. and generally no real idea of what to expect - I managed to get results I still haven't been able to top yet ..

I'll just blame seeing

The EQ6 is arriving on Monday. I knew it wouldn't arrive today because the forecast is clear for another 4 days - that would be too perfect
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-10-2008, 09:02 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
heh... I've been DYING in this damn cloud fest we've had...

I just want to get out imaging... its leading towards depression...

You'll love the EQ6 mate.. Your setup will look a hell of a lot like mine did in 3 months ago... 8" newt, eq6, 900nc

Just so you're aware, the EQ6 does not come with a power source of any kind, just a lead to a cigarette lighter plug... you'll need either a 240v to 12v transformer (must be 2 amps minimum, preferably more) or, as seen in my pic, a 12v battery unit.. That unit cost me $80 from Supercheap auto, and runs my mount for about 7~8 hours..

Nobody told me about that when I ordered my EQ6, it arrived, skies were clear, but I had NO WAY TO POWER IT!!!

That was devistating.

Alex.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Jupimager.jpg)
95.6 KB15 views
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-10-2008, 09:33 PM
deadsimple's Avatar
deadsimple (Ash)
Registered User

deadsimple is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 180
Yeah I rang around and found out about accessories. I managed to find an EQ6 (non-GOTO) for about $1300 including shipping, included dovetail bar. It was either than or a GOTO HEQ5 for the same price, so I went the sturdier mount ... giving up automation.

I've had my eye on this power supply:

http://www.dse.com.au/cgi-bin/dse.st.../product/M9940

Seems to have plenty of adapters, hopefully this will do the trick.

I can't see the SCP from the back yard but I have a digital elevation meter and will find myself a compass. Should be good enough for planetary shots yeah? Just spend a while setting it all up, then sit back at the laptop - then corrections every couple of minutes?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-10-2008, 09:58 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
I have one of those power adapters also... Works fine!

I think I've got a spare connector somewhere that will lengthen the hand controllers cable quite a bit, so you could have your hand controller next to your laptop and make adjustments without even getting up

for the first few months with my EQ6 I 'eyeballed' my polar alignment with a compass and inclinometer, I got it very accurate a few times, to the point where Jupiter would stay on the screen for 2hrs or so, with a 5x powermate... (tiny field of view) So yeah, your digital elevation meter and compass will work fine....

I might be wrong, but im fairly certain that even a non-goto EQ6 can use EQMOD.. You can plug the EQ6 directly into your laptop (without a hand controller) and use a program such as The Sky or Starry Night, and effectively have GOTO via the PC... I'll check if it works with a non-goto eq6, but im fairly sure, as the only difference between the goto and non-goto is the hand controller (afaik)

Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17-10-2008, 10:09 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Just checked, EQMOD will work with a non-goto mount, and then you will have GOTO... EQMOD is free software, you'll need an adapter, I've ordered mine from shoestring astronomy for $39USD

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-10-2008, 10:33 PM
deadsimple's Avatar
deadsimple (Ash)
Registered User

deadsimple is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 180
Ah I got my hopes up, but it seems the standard EQ6 is not compatible:

http://stargazerslounge.com/index.php?topic=21402.5

Need an EQ6 with Syntrek or a Pro
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 17-10-2008, 10:51 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Syntrek is the non-goto eq6.. then you've got the EQ6 with Skyscan (first version of GOTO, then Synscan (current version of GOTO)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17-10-2008, 11:29 PM
deadsimple's Avatar
deadsimple (Ash)
Registered User

deadsimple is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 180
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Syntrek is the non-goto eq6.
Yeah it's a shame I don't have even this - stuck with 2x, 8x and 16x speeds on the basic EQ6.

But for $1300 I can't really complain. Can always upgrade the motors/controller later. Basic tracking should do for now .. much better than having my hand behind a dob moving it around
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17-10-2008, 11:36 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Trust me. I know the repetitive nudge nudge nudge of the dob wears even the most patient man down...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement