Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-03-2008, 02:00 PM
kljucd1's Avatar
kljucd1 (Daniel)
Registered User

kljucd1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gledswood Hills, Australia
Posts: 276
Couple more Widefields of the Milkyway Galaxy

Hi,

The following were taken on 29 Feb 2008 and are single exposures.

Image 1 is 18mm @F5, 245 seconds, ISO400 and was processed (heavily ) in CS2. Too much blue remaining but cannot improve as I start to lose detail.

Image 2 is 125mm@F8, 172 second, ISO400 and processed in CS2.

The second is my favourite.

Full res here and here

Enjoy

Daniel...
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Widefield-of-Milkyway-1-IIS.jpg)
76.7 KB47 views
Click for full-size image (Widefield-of-Milkyway-2-IIS.jpg)
72.3 KB83 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2008, 02:53 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Nice. Can see some DSO in the middle of the second one. Which is it?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-03-2008, 11:47 PM
kljucd1's Avatar
kljucd1 (Daniel)
Registered User

kljucd1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gledswood Hills, Australia
Posts: 276
Hi,

I had the camera pointed up towards the Eta Carina area, so I hope that is the one.

Daniel...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-03-2008, 11:49 PM
JohnH's Avatar
JohnH
Member # 159

JohnH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,226
That would be NGC3372 aka Eta Carina. This is a cropped vsn of the same area at almost the same scale:

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/a...4&d=1203745336
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-03-2008, 06:39 PM
kljucd1's Avatar
kljucd1 (Daniel)
Registered User

kljucd1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gledswood Hills, Australia
Posts: 276
Cool.

So why can't I pick up on all that detail? I get 5 minute exposures max on the Pentax, or otherwise my images are waaayyyyy to noisy.

Daniel...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-03-2008, 08:14 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,805
Daniel you need to take at least 10 exposures of at least 3 to 5 minutes each of the exact area, and than with software, such as Image Plus or similar align/combine, and composite a single image.

So than in effect you would end up with an exposure of 30 or 50 minutes.

This will provide you with so much more data, which you can than take to PS2 and enhance the image.

However a very good effort indeed

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-03-2008, 09:07 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Thats pretty ordinary, what am I looking at?, needs some work .
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-03-2008, 09:32 PM
kljucd1's Avatar
kljucd1 (Daniel)
Registered User

kljucd1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gledswood Hills, Australia
Posts: 276
Hi,

Thanks Leon, will give it a go.

Daniel...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2008, 12:09 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Thats pretty ordinary, what am I looking at?, needs some work .
Hey Fred, given the quality of the skies and the light polution in Liverpool lately I reckon it's pretty bloody good. You should lend him your narrow band filters.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement