Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
  #1  
Old 18-10-2007, 11:08 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Gemini users - A/E errors

Do people use the A:E numbers given by the system (polar alignment errors) as a guide for when they are happy with their alignment? What numbers satisfy you?
Or do people tend to just make sure stars don't drift for how long?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-10-2007, 11:37 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
yep make sure they dont drift for as long as possible - then the autoguider takes over
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-10-2007, 09:05 AM
JohnG's Avatar
JohnG (John)
Looking Down From Above

JohnG is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cootamundra, NSW
Posts: 1,711
The closer the A and E numbers are to zero the better, even with them at zero, you are still within a 1 arcminute box of the pole, this is where the A and E, + or - signs come into play.



Southern Hemisphere



A+ Move the mount front to the East

A- Move the mount front to the West



E+ Indicates you have to LOWER the mount


E- Indicates you have to RAISE the mount



Information from the Gemini Users Group.

Cheers

Last edited by JohnG; 19-10-2007 at 10:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-10-2007, 10:53 AM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
John,

that's a nice summary of the numbers, but what do you mean by "mount front" ? (when looking south or when looking north?)

Thanks,
Roger.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnG View Post
A+ Move the mount front to the East

A- Move the mount front to the West
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-10-2007, 11:04 AM
JohnG's Avatar
JohnG (John)
Looking Down From Above

JohnG is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cootamundra, NSW
Posts: 1,711
Hi Roger

The way I understand it is that the front of the mount is the counterweight bar/large elevation knob side, ie:

Looking down from the top, you turn the mount, counter clockwise to get an easterly movement, or:

Looking down from the top, you turn the mount, clockwise to get a westerly movement.

cheers

Last edited by JohnG; 19-10-2007 at 01:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-10-2007, 01:58 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Gets confusing, the whole which way is up/down/left/right/east/west! I have found the only way to get really good alignment is to drift, and hope for numbers down around 0 or 1 to confirm (makes me feel better)....

I know which way is which when looking through the refractor with diagonal, and have it written down with a picture of which way to "push" the star depending on which way it drifts, depending on which side of meridian the scope (for low horizon drifting)....

I was going to put some stickers on the knobs, but haven't got around to it yet.

I still think the damn PAC doesn't work! Tried again last night.... didn't help.....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-10-2007, 03:36 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by plasmodium View Post
I was going to put some stickers on the knobs, but haven't got around to it yet.
Good idea ... I must do the same. I have written down things like clockwise/anti-clockwise, but glow-in-the-dark marker pen on the mount would be good, or sticker.

Quote:
Originally Posted by plasmodium View Post
I still think the damn PAC doesn't work! Tried again last night.... didn't help.....
yeah, I had a thread going many months ago about that, and my attempts at using it. I gave up in the end, but only tried it 5 odd times I guess. I'm not sure what was going on - maybe it needs some tweaking for the southern hemisphere or something.

I also find the A and E numbers go up and down all over the place when I do 6 star alignments, but the pointing accuracy is always dead on, so I don't understand why it thinks some alignment points are so far out yet the pointing is so good.

So I tend to ignore the A and E numbers as I'm never sure if they really know what's going on.

Roger.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-10-2007, 05:37 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
I did send an email to the developer (Goerlich?) - who swears blind PAC has been fully tested in the Sthn Hemisphere and is good to go..... I was to send him a big list of AE's from an alignment, but never got around to it.... gave up and drift aligned instead!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-10-2007, 05:59 PM
JohnG's Avatar
JohnG (John)
Looking Down From Above

JohnG is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cootamundra, NSW
Posts: 1,711
I tend to agree with you guy's, I always do a Drift Align then build a model from there. The A and E numbers will be quite high for a while but usually settle down after 4 or 5 Addittional Aligns on the one side then finally settle when you do further Addittional Aligns on the opposite side.

At the moment, mine is around 6 arc minutes out in azimuth and 3 arc minutes low in elevation, hasn't effected the GOTO at all and the autoguider has no problems guiding so I have just left it.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement