Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 04-05-2007, 07:44 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
So, you're saying for lunar and planetary go the aluminium?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-05-2007, 08:18 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt View Post
So, you're saying for lunar and planetary go the aluminium?
Yes – if the Al tube was sufficiently cheaper than the CF tube and I didn’t require the thermal properties of CF, I would have personally purchased the Al OTA and put the savings to some other bit of gear. At the time of purchase, there were conflicting reports regarding which was the “best” and so far, I have been content with the CF and its lack of focus change over long exposures.

However, if I figured that in a year or two I might expand my interests into astro photography of DSO’s, I would go the CF route just to minimise focus change, although I must say, the CF tube does look rather sexy!

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-05-2007, 08:30 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,902
Same as Dennis, I went CF to minimise focusing changes for longer duration shots. I finf mine keeps focus day by day, night by night across a wide variation of temperatures. I wonder if Al would do the same!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement