Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Talk
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-02-2007, 07:28 PM
solidstate
Registered User

solidstate is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: shepparton
Posts: 4
newbie question

Why dont we use aluminium for mirror instead of just the coating glass/pyrex I understand there must a reason I was just wondering what it was, does it polish well enough or are the thermal properties lacking.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-02-2007, 07:47 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,738
Good question.
I'm looking forward to seeing what the answer is.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-02-2007, 10:23 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,493
With aluminium there would be to much flexing due to temperature changes, and pyrex one the other hand is very stable and has a very low expansion rate.
Focusing would be difficult to hold with aluminium.

leon
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-02-2007, 10:33 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Solid state, you've answered your own question. metals have high thermal expansion coefficient (or whatever it's called) - ie expand a lot more with increasing temperature than glass.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-02-2007, 10:41 PM
okiscopey's Avatar
okiscopey (Mike)
Rocky Peak Observatory

okiscopey is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kandos NSW
Posts: 536
Probably all about thermal expansion, which need to be as low as possible to preserve the shape and thus focal length (etc.) of the mirror.

Compared with Pyrex, aluminium has about seven times higher 'thermal coefficient of expansion' (if I got my calculations wrong, it might be 70 times!), and ordinary glass two to three times. Pyrex also has a low 'thermal resistance' ... presumably this is a good thing.

Speculum metal was used in telescopes until the mid 1800's but tarnished easily: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speculum_metal

Also I seem to have heard that mirrors have been created by rotating large pools of mercury which then form the desired paraboloid shape (under hi-tech computer control I suppose).

That's about all I can contribute about metallic mirrors!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-02-2007, 10:33 AM
astro_nutt
Registered User

astro_nutt is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,013
I was thinking of casting an aluminium plate with copper tubing coiled in it so as to maintain an even temperature via pumping glycol coolant through it..this should maintain a steady temperature and therefore minimize thermal expansion...theorectically...just like a cars cooling system!!...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-02-2007, 07:28 PM
solidstate
Registered User

solidstate is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: shepparton
Posts: 4
the only real advantage to aluminium is ease of manufacture particualy with larger mirrors. You might be able to improve the thermal characteristics of the cell with heat sinks fluid etc maybe thin plate fluid base but the added cost would offset the gains. Having said that even a half working system would be interesting after all if we just wanted pictures of stars we could just download them.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28-02-2007, 07:39 PM
solidstate
Registered User

solidstate is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: shepparton
Posts: 4
still would expand though unless you cooled it then you get condensation
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 28-02-2007, 09:03 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,962
There is also a problem with figuring and polishing: easy to achieve with glass but not so easy with metals.
BTW, first reflectors were made of speculum alloy - brittle material suitable for making mirrors, but it is quite heavy.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28-02-2007, 09:09 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by okiscopey View Post
Probably all about thermal expansion, which need to be as low as possible to preserve the shape and thus focal length (etc.) of the mirror.

Compared with Pyrex, aluminium has about seven times higher 'thermal coefficient of expansion' (if I got my calculations wrong, it might be 70 times!), and ordinary glass two to three times. Pyrex also has a low 'thermal resistance' ... presumably this is a good thing.

Speculum metal was used in telescopes until the mid 1800's but tarnished easily: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speculum_metal

Also I seem to have heard that mirrors have been created by rotating large pools of mercury which then form the desired paraboloid shape (under hi-tech computer control I suppose).

That's about all I can contribute about metallic mirrors!
I just saw your answer, Okiscopey, so my previous note is quite unnecessary
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 28-02-2007, 09:23 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,962
Long time ago I had an idea of a mirror, made of thin foil covering a metal plate with shallow cavity (Mylar was not available then), and the parabolic surface would have been formed by lower pressure of air between the metal plate and mylar foil. I even contemplated to patent the idea :-) I even made the small prototype and it even worked somehow ...
Another method of parabolizing of such mirror could be achieved by applying the high voltage beteeen the two ..
In both cases such mirror would have been adjustable in terms of focal length..
But the mere fact that the mirrors are today made of pyrex for so long now it telling us something: that glass is THE way to go.
Other methods are just to fussy and /or expensive or not good or stable enough.
B

Last edited by bojan; 28-02-2007 at 09:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-03-2007, 12:25 AM
astro_nutt
Registered User

astro_nutt is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,013
Thanks for the info guys!!...back to the drawing board
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-03-2007, 12:23 PM
okiscopey's Avatar
okiscopey (Mike)
Rocky Peak Observatory

okiscopey is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kandos NSW
Posts: 536
Quote:
Originally Posted by astro_nutt View Post
Thanks for the info guys!!...back to the drawing board
I bet you'll find the drawing board is made of wood, just as astro mirrors are made of glass!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-03-2007, 03:08 PM
astro_nutt
Registered User

astro_nutt is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,013
Oh HA..HA!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement