Carbon sequestration is another con job
..It is that simple..An excuse to move money is what it boils down to.. I heard our Government is going to spend $500,000,000-00 on this impossible dream
. There is absolutely no plausible evidence to support the notion.. non whatsoever.. any one who cares to look can see same but because their gaze is firmly fixed on the falling sky, they don’t
. If all the carbon is successfully removed by such a system (and that is impossible in the extreme) we still have a situation that the planet is warming so what is the point other than moving money from the people’s pockets to vested interests that are behind this global warming lobby
.. the global warming lobby is about one thing and one thing only …making money out of a scare campaign that chicken littles buy. We are the stupid chicken littles and each and every one of us should feel firstly stupid and vulnerable. Remember the Y2K bug?? Remember the folk storing food for the day riots broke out because the system would break down if something was not done..where did the money go mmm same place as the bug went to hide.? We should feel indignation that we are treated with such distain. However we deserve to have such tricks played upon us because we do nothing to stand up for truth by not taking the time to simply think about the bulldust we are fed and stupidly consume
.
When you see Mr Gore working his lift to find the figures that “are off the chart” ask yourself is this science??? well as a “salesman” I can tell you yes it is “science” ..the “science of selling”. Rule of selling draw extreme examples to make your point.
The con now is to sell us nuclear power stations and desalinates, we hear the “science” we see the pictures and we feel the guilt. AND make no mistake it will happen the deal has been done all they are doing now is to convince the unsuspecting chicken littles they were the ones that had the idea.. Geez I have sold houses to people who were on their way home from holidays and stopped for a coffee and thought they would have a look in the agent’s window.. they did not know they wanted to live in my town until “sold” the idea
. AND if I could sell 10 houses Mr Gore could sell 100 he is the best salesman I have seen in operation
. So what is he selling I don’t see his operation as that of a concerned citizen spending his wealth to help the world.. Maybe the US public will thrust him into the White House because he is a caring person as that is the image to run with given he is so concerned with global warming. Does he really care ..yes about what is good for him and his.. think otherwise and you are a fool.
And our pollies must see the value in the global warming bulldust given the way they are eager to spend our money so quickly and in the face of a 50% opposition, opposition that they take care to use every opportunity to marginalise.… no opponent to any idea deserves to be labelled “not real” before the argument has started. Can’t beat them with the facts as they are cooked so let’s just call the opponents crazy..I would like to be as crazy as the experts who say the problem is stated incorrectly..smart people who have done their homework are not “not real” …but using that term calls into question their undisputable scientific findings. . obviously no debate on nuclear power took place or was ever expected to take place as the sites for power stations must have already been available given how fast they were released after the PM’s statement. But don’t get me wrong I like John Howard and think he is a good man it is sad to see him manipulated this way and forced to make such press releases to satisfy a strong lobby, it is personally upsetting. I always saw him as a decent man with the gutz to stand up for what is right
.. That is unfortunately very silly of me (and others) as no man can remain that strong in the face of the lobby group that has set upon him. Who was the crew who came up with the nuclear sites any ways..I know it had “Commonwealth” in the title which would suggest a Government body but was it??
I doubt it. Who was chosen to “head” this group?And if not a Government body how come they can use the term “Commonwealth” in their title… that is not allowed at law. How can someone get such a name registered I question
.
One hears horror stories about Russian subs rotting in dock the nuclear fuel threatening to leak away with no one prepared to anything about it..
With this Global Warming nonsense one wonders two things..Are these rumours with any foundation? Are they being started so money can be spent to clean up a non existent problem? Well if not rumours and this is happening, how can the nuclear lobby say to us that nuclear has no problems
.
Is this the world they expect us to happily except?. All Governments have a tendency to screw up when dealing with real issues. Can no one see a future where a Government will not act to fix up a nuclear problem because it costs too much and the committee has not released its report on what should be done.. and one thinks given the committee recommendations the Governments of the world would follow the expert findings.. well they don’t.. it surprises me that all think there will be no problems..in the perfect world yes there will be no problems, but I am sorry to be the one to break the news we do not live in a perfect world..corruption greed and self serving promotion of vested interests rule the play. Well common folk have to look after their self interest also not leave it in the hands of self serving gluttons..protect our cash, protect our reasonable views from brain washing by one of the best salesmen on the planet and protect our future.
I was wrong the big add is next week ..so get ready for a week of more doom and gloom.. but don’t get hit by any falling sky even us chicken littles can think if we take the time.
See if you can get a letter in opposition published this week. Look for the claims to reinforce your guilt of heating the planet. Just look and you will see it all unfold as I suggest… but I would be very very happy to be wrong on this but I got money to say I wont be and would even back my view with an odds on bet… and I never do that.
AND if we go nuclear why, why why will we not reap the benefits but be called upon to live in a polluted country thats only role is to bury the waste and supply the mine sites.
Why is there no talk that the fuel be nationalised? Should it not be nationalised for control and benefit of the people of this country?. Makes sense to me but I am sure there will be many experts come forward to say that is a silly idea...mmm exactly what part of such an idea is silly?? Do we need these things controlled by private concerns as they know whats better for us than our Government? Does it strike at the free market and cause investors to go elsewhere..I leave that to you to decide.
Alex
if the market cant control its drive. And a few of the suggestions provided herein adopted but a market economy depends on consumption to grow and to sustain its future..not saying that is wrong but it means if you have the money you become wasteful..big cars, homes, too much of everything much of which need not be consumed but require energy to produce.
