Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-02-2007, 10:39 AM
vindictive666's Avatar
vindictive666 (John)
KeyboardNotFndPressAnyKey

vindictive666 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: geraldton western australia
Posts: 1,184
Cold Fusion

hi all

just a post about Cold Fusion just interested in comments viable alternative yes no sort of thing ?

for power generation

Last edited by vindictive666; 11-02-2007 at 06:39 PM. Reason: meant to add for power generation
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2007, 06:35 PM
DobDobDob's Avatar
DobDobDob (Ron)
Blacktown isn't so black

DobDobDob is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prospect, NSW, 2148
Posts: 1,316
I assume you are not referring to the computer programming language

If you are, I left it and now use ASPX on the Dot Net platform.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2007, 07:12 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Yes and No
or I dont really know
Scotish Law provides 3 verdicts are available.. guilty, not guilty and unproven
In spite of my dreams of getting power direct from the Sun we must consider everything . We have nuclear power the secret is to imporve it I guess .
alex
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2007, 08:03 PM
ispom's Avatar
ispom
admirer of the sky

ispom is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 429
during there is an international co-operation with the construction of an test power station in Southern France for the hot nuclear fusion,
one also should not neglect the cold fusion as an energy source.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion

I assume, this subject however is very secrecy.
2004 had invited the US energy Ministry 18 renowned scientists to a conference, in order to discuss this question. In the result the opinions of the participants were about the question „Is there compelling evidence for power CAN emergency attributed tons ordinary chemical or solvently states SOURCEs? “in equal parts splitted. By agreement however one suggested examining further
the characteristics of „deuterated metals “and the particles discharged by them; this under employment of more modern procedures and instruments.

There is a similar secrecy as at that time working about the Uranium nuclear fission.
I expect still large surprises on cold fusion…
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-03-2009, 07:14 AM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,372
Scientists in possible cold fusion breakthrough

WASHINGTON (AFP) – Researchers at a US Navy laboratory have unveiled what they say is "significant" evidence of cold fusion, a potential energy source that has many skeptics in the scientific community.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090324...eenergynuclear

U.S. Navy Cold Fusion Research
http://www.lenr-canr.org/Collections/USNavy.htm
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-03-2009, 08:39 AM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
No, not possible.

I'm fairly sure the hoopla stems from a very old mis-use of the term "fusion" that was in common use in tertiary chemistry texts from the 1920's to the 1960's, where "fusion" referred to the joining of two or more ATOMS to make a MOLECULE in a chemical reaction. The original perpetrators of this myth - Fleischman and Pons - are old enough to have been educated that way. In this respect "fusion" is constantly occurring at a frantic rate in a glass of water between OH- and H+ ions.

This is not "fusion" in the sense used in physics.

All the experiments conducted since have ben found to be flawed, mainly with respect to detecting background radiation in the lab and electronic thermal noise within the instruments.

High time this myth was buried, once and for all, along with "NASA faked the moon landings" and countless others.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-03-2009, 06:30 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wavytone View Post
High time this myth was buried, once and for all, along with "NASA faked the moon landings" and countless others.
Perpetual motion comes to mind.

Fusion in the true sense of the word is not going to happen at room temp and atmospheric pressure. The extremes of a sun's core is needed. Cold fusion is a myth.

Mark
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement