ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waxing Gibbous 77.9%
|
|

08-01-2007, 12:25 PM
|
 |
Whats visual Astronomy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
|
|
Anarcotes image of the day "Horsey"
Just wanted to share this image that looks fantastic.
Yes he has dark skies and heaps of experience but I still like looking at what people can produce with the same gear I will have in around 3 months.
I havn't seen a lot of images taken with the TOA150 & STL11000 combination.
It is a lot of exposure time as well.
http://www.buytelescopes.com/gallery...pid=11132&sg=8
|

08-01-2007, 12:34 PM
|
 |
AstroNan
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 685
|
|
|

08-01-2007, 01:16 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,643
|
|
Impressive indeed, thanks for the link Tony !
|

08-01-2007, 01:46 PM
|
 |
lots of eyes on you!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
|
|
that is beautiful
|

08-01-2007, 02:59 PM
|
![[1ponders]'s Avatar](../vbiis/customavatars/avatar45_9.gif) |
Retired, damn no pension
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
|
|
Very nice, shame about the spikes though
|

08-01-2007, 04:19 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
|
|
Very nice image. So smooth yet so sharp. I'm not sure which I could stare at longer though .... the picture of the equipment used or the astro pic
|

08-01-2007, 06:23 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
|
|
Would really look nice on the AP900 Tony.
I see the specs have been released on the new Q:
http://www.buytelescopes.com/product...=&pid=11677&m=
Am on the wait list for this one. Can't wait.
|

08-01-2007, 06:31 PM
|
 |
6EQUJ5
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders]
Very nice, shame about the spikes though 
|
my first reaction as well
|

08-01-2007, 07:12 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
|
|
Nice image, very sharp, but to me it looks a little overprocessed. I don't like the spikes either....
|

08-01-2007, 08:04 PM
|
 |
Whats visual Astronomy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
|
|
Gee....probably the nicest image I have seen of this region on this forum and your all bagging it.....I feel sorry for those who have imaged the horse as of late....lol
Maybe its because it's not a forum member's image.
Everyone seems to get a bit scared to offend members images instead of telling them the truth so they can learn from it.
I agree with you all on the spikes....but I dont look at the star spikes when looking at this image.
I would be stoked to get a image half this good.
Jase the new FSQ was tempting for me it was the short focal length that put me off.
|

08-01-2007, 08:08 PM
|
 |
Sir Post a Lot!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
|
|
I think it's a marvellous image!
I'd be stoked for you if you got an image half as good
|

08-01-2007, 08:14 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,643
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman
I think it's a marvellous image!
I'd be stoked for you if you got an image half as good 
|
I'd be amazed, considering he doesn't have a scope !
|

08-01-2007, 08:20 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
|
|
LOL.  Errrmmm forget about it Tony. The TOA-150 tube assembly weighs 19.4kg. Add 2kg for the STL series CCD camera, then flatteners/reducers ~.3kg - Total 21.7kg
Whats that?? Your bored of LRGB imaging and want to get into narrowband with Ha,OIII and SII filters. Need a guidescope then because your self guiding camera aint going to see a thing through those filters.
Your AP900 has an instrument weight capacity of 31.8kg. So you have 10.1kg left for your guidescope, computerised focuser and other accessories. Possibly cutting it fine. The FSQ-106 is 6kg so perhaps that would make a nice guidescope/second imaging scope.
Should have gone the Titan with a weight capacity of 45.3kg.
|

08-01-2007, 08:41 PM
|
 |
Whats visual Astronomy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
|
|
The TOA150 is 14.8..where did you get the 19.4...or then again where did I get 14.8 from...my guide scope is only 3kg's.
I already have a guide scope...once I finish it I will post an image.
It depends how you look at the weight ratings Jase..the titan's ratting is really for visual where the AP is for imaging.
But like the Tak mounts which are rated low but can handle much more.
But I would have been happy with a Titan, I can always use the extra shed space...hehehehe
Robofocus has arrived,...wahoo 4 days in transit from the states...funny I wont have a scope to put it on for months yet.
|

08-01-2007, 09:00 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,643
|
|
The AP900 will easily handle the TOA 150 setup.
|

08-01-2007, 09:03 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
|
|
Tony, that's not fair, i knew i shouldn't have opened that image,  absoulutly beautiful,
Cheers leon
|

09-01-2007, 05:41 PM
|
 |
Highest Observatory in Oz
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
|
|
All good to me!
Tak TOA 150 = brilliant scope
AP900 = superb mount
STL 11000 = great camera
Ooooh Tony...pressure to perform now, huh?  ....just like me
That Horsehead image is very good indeed! The spikes look ok, even though they were added, must say though, I have never been able to bring myself to add string to the objective of my Starfire  ...just seemed like optical heresy to me..?
Bright Zeta Orionis was handled very well in this image too IMO.
I too would be very happy to get this from the ASA N12, in fact I will have a similar FOV to this ie 1.8deg X 1.2Deg with the PL11002  .
Mike
|

09-01-2007, 06:18 PM
|
 |
Tasmania
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia - Hobart
Posts: 727
|
|
Wow!
I had absolutly no idea this sort of image was even possible for the home astronomer....
That is a beautiful image!
How long till you expect to have all your new gear Striker?
|

09-01-2007, 06:23 PM
|
 |
Whats visual Astronomy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
|
|
Quote:
Ooooh Tony...pressure to perform now, huh? ....just like me
|
Mike who said anything about imaging with this set up...that takes too long and is too difficult.
I'm just going to look and caress the scope and mount for the first 6 months then I might turn it on maybe....lol
I know how hard that must of been for you to say Mike STL 11000 = Great Camera....hahahaha
3 Months Dave
|

09-01-2007, 10:42 PM
|
 |
Highest Observatory in Oz
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
|
|
A strong hunch
Of course the STL is a great camera, I'm just gambling on a strong hunch that the ProLine is even better
Nothing wrong with looking through that kit at all, that's exactly what I'd do too
I think your setup will be a little more user friendly than mine actually due to the anticipated collimation temprementality of a fast Newt but once tweeked properly the F3.8 and 12" of apperture plus carbon fibre tube should prove a good system..? well that's what my gut is telling me anyway...and my gut is bigger these days
Mike
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:36 AM.
|
|