Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 31-12-2006, 06:52 PM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
matt did you ever plug a camera into it?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 31-12-2006, 06:56 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Yeah.

Did some ToUcam planetary images with it.

Nothing else, though. Have never captured DSO with any scope or camera.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 31-12-2006, 08:58 PM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
hey for anyone - say I am just looking at 2 scopes for the moment, the 8" and 10" skywatchers.

Do you think the EQ6 could handle the 10" photographically (assuming no wind - my backyard is very well shielded)? Or do you think the 8" would be safer.

The 8" is 1000mm and is $590. unsure of weight.
The 10" is 1200mm and is about $1150 i think. I think it is 14kg.

gotta run for the rest of the night happy new year guys

Gav
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 31-12-2006, 09:09 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
The 10" f/4.7 skywatcher is the same OTA as the one my new Saxon Dob. From what I've seen so far it has excellent optics, and it is very well made. The Dob cost me $800 from Telescope Shed so I would not pay $1150 just for the OTA. Mick Pinner has the OTA only version of the scope and he had a look at my Dob and said it is the exact same scope minus the Dob base. Would need a fairly hefty EQ mount to put it on.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 31-12-2006, 09:25 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
I know Steve Massey puts his 10" Skywatcher on top of an EQ6.

He reckons it's stable enough for astrophotography
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 31-12-2006, 11:35 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
well to guide with a scope that long you need aguide scope so go the 8 with the ed80 on as well. if you do the 10 you might need another way of guiding, like easy guider etc?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 31-12-2006, 11:47 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
How about an ED 100 or ED 120?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-01-2007, 12:07 AM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
I have the 8" skywatcher on my EQ6 and have guided very successfully with it, I plan on putting an ED80 ontop of it when I get one, the mount will handle it fine, as for the 10" you may have small issues but I have heard of more weight being used on the EQ6 for visual... The 10" is a big tube.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-01-2007, 10:43 AM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
Looking on the web, I can see you are spot on with this - but I'm not sure if that'll make a difference to the end price And I'm too much of a dummy to buy the dob, and put a dovetail on it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by janoskiss View Post
The 10" f/4.7 skywatcher is the same OTA as the one my new Saxon Dob. From what I've seen so far it has excellent optics, and it is very well made. The Dob cost me $800 from Telescope Shed so I would not pay $1150 just for the OTA. Mick Pinner has the OTA only version of the scope and he had a look at my Dob and said it is the exact same scope minus the Dob base. Would need a fairly hefty EQ mount to put it on.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-01-2007, 10:44 AM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
hey h0ughy why wouldn't the ed80 be ok to guide it? I thought it would be ok as I can see guys with sct's using it to guide as well?

That said, the 8 is probably the most sensible

Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
well to guide with a scope that long you need aguide scope so go the 8 with the ed80 on as well. if you do the 10 you might need another way of guiding, like easy guider etc?
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 01-01-2007, 10:45 AM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
I like the refractors but the 100 is probably too close to my 80, and the 120 is pretty expensive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ballaratdragons View Post
How about an ED 100 or ED 120?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-01-2007, 11:28 AM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Houghy means if you go with the 10" it may be to heavy combined with the ED80 ontop so you wont have a guide scope to use.

The 8" wont give you any problems with the ED80 ontop.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-01-2007, 11:39 AM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
I've got a twin dovetail plate thingy arriving that will let me run the scopes side by side rather than directly on top - would that help? I thought it would give it a better center of gravity.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-01-2007, 12:19 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Yes it can help but you may not be able to sit a 10" beside and ED80 anyway.

This will also make balancing the scope very difficult.

I know with the Losmandy side by side saddle the 8" is maximum size with the ED80 side by side.

Remembering the overall diameter of the 10" newt is not 10"..I am not sure exact measurements but I would say it's closer to 12" diameter.

Last edited by Striker; 01-01-2007 at 02:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-01-2007, 02:38 PM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
very good point. I didn't think of the width of the tube.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-01-2007, 02:49 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
gee for 400 you can afford to have a play! Save your money for a real scope
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-01-2007, 02:58 PM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
What's a real scope I'm never going to spend 5-7k (and the rest) on a big refractor. Realistically it'd either be a sct or a reflector. The 8" reflector is only $590 though.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-01-2007, 04:51 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by sejanus View Post
What's a real scope I'm never going to spend 5-7k (and the rest) on a big refractor. Realistically it'd either be a sct or a reflector. The 8" reflector is only $590 though.
Its your money, but we like to spend it for you
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-01-2007, 05:20 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
I do like the sound of the Meade Astrophotography Scope available from Bintel.

It is set up for Astro pics and is at a great price as well! $399.

It is a 6" f5 Newt complete with Tube rings & Dovetail plate, and camera adaptor.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Meade Astropic scope.jpg)
16.8 KB14 views
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-01-2007, 06:07 PM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
hey ken it looked good initially but it got panned a bit earlier in thread. The 8" skywatcher f/5 is only $190 more and seems decent and as much as I'd like the 10 the 8" one prob makes sense.

I assume the shops are open tomorrow so i might find somewhere with them in stock and go look at the 8 and 10 side by side.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement