ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waxing Crescent 16.5%
|
|

19-04-2025, 06:34 PM
|
 |
Want to do better
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Pittsworth QLD
Posts: 479
|
|
off axis guider advice
Hello,
I would appreciate advice on a suitable off axis guider and camera to suite a Tak Mewlon 250..
The main camera is a QHY 8l, I have a ZWO ASI 120mm I could use as a guide camera
but better alternatives are available, perhaps a ccd guide camera with its ability to guide on fainter stars.
The offers out there baffle me.
Chris
|

19-04-2025, 08:05 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2025
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 82
|
|
Hello Chris
On my C9i am using the celestron OAG due to its large prism and the ASI174mm mini guide camera. Works a treat and takes advantage of the big prism.
This seemed to be the advice always given for scopes of that focal length.
I also have the 120mm but use it on my small SVBONY SV555 scope and that always finds guiding stars without an issue, but i have not tried it with the OAG, and not sure i will bother to be perfectly honest.
Reason i went with the celestron over something like the ZWO OAG-L and some of the others was that it can be screwed onto cameras rather then bolted on, and you can rotate the main camera or the guide camera individually. With something like the ZWO OAG-L you would need to also add a rotator.
The disadvantage of the celestron OAG is its size, its 29mm thick, so if backspacing is tight, it may not work for you
|

19-04-2025, 09:44 PM
|
 |
Want to do better
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Pittsworth QLD
Posts: 479
|
|
guide camera
Thanks John, the individual rotations do sound attractive and I have the back focus range to attach it. Joshua Bunn made an adapter to attach my qhy camera to the 42 mm female thread the scope supplies, I guess I would need one for the OAG.
A couple of months ago there was listed a CCD guide camera which might do the job. The add timed out in the imaging equipment forum and I can find no track of it now.
Chris
|

20-04-2025, 11:07 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,159
|
|
I don't think there is any ccd guider more sensitive than a cmos one.
I use a zwo 190 and i think a 120.
Almost never can't find a guide star.
Greg
|

22-04-2025, 07:07 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,988
|
|
At Swan Reach Imaging, we have in the past used a ZWO OAG-L on a Mewlon 250 CR. Worked well with a 190 Mini guider. Always plenty of stars to be found.
|

24-04-2025, 01:00 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 857
|
|
I would recommend the ZWO ASI174MM Mini - has a really big chip, so make it a lot easier to find stars.
|

26-04-2025, 07:29 PM
|
 |
Want to do better
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Pittsworth QLD
Posts: 479
|
|
oag
Thanks JohhHello Chris
On my C9i am using the celestron OAG due to its large prism and the ASI174mm mini guide camera. Works a treat and takes advantage of the big prism.
This seemed to be the advice always given for scopes of that focal length.
I also have the 120mm but use it on my small SVBONY SV555 scope and that always finds guiding stars without an issue, but i have not tried it with the OAG, and not sure i will bother to be perfectly honest.
Reason i went with the celestron over something like the ZWO OAG-L and some of the others was that it can be screwed onto cameras rather then bolted on, and you can rotate the main camera or the guide camera individually. With something like the ZWO OAG-L you would need to also add a rotator.
The disadvantage of the celestron OAG is its size, its 29mm thick, so if backspacing is tight, it may not work for you
On my C9i am using the celestron OAG due to its large prism and the ASI174mm mini guide camera. Works a treat and takes advantage of the big prism.
This seemed to be the advice always given for scopes of that focal length.
I also have the 120mm but use it on my small SVBONY SV555 scope and that always finds guiding stars without an issue, but i have not tried it with the OAG, and not sure i will bother to be perfectly honest.
Reason i went with the celestron over something like the ZWO OAG-L and some of the others was that it can be screwed onto cameras rather then bolted on, and you can rotate the main camera or the guide camera individually. With something like the ZWO OAG-L you would need to also add a rotator.
The disadvantage of the celestron OAG is its size, its 29mm thick, so if backspacing is tight, it may not work for you oag and camera, celestron and the 174
Chris
|

27-04-2025, 09:54 AM
|
 |
Want to do better
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Pittsworth QLD
Posts: 479
|
|
ordered
Thanks for all the advice. I have ordered the celestron oag and zwo 174 mini, lured by John's description.
Chris
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:34 PM.
|
|