Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 16-10-2022, 09:11 PM
oska (John)
Illucid

oska is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Federal
Posts: 736
High gain experiments

Just for fun on a poor seeing night, 3rd Oct - 1/4 moon, heavy dew & patchy clouds. I figured I'd have a little fun. I tried a range of gain values and let NINA's exposure calculator guide me on exposure, basically 3-5 times recommended.

These are all experiments and no effort was made to "get" an image, basically to see what all the fuss was about, and now I see

ASI1600MC-c calibrated with darks, flats & dark flats.
Unity gain for reference is 139. 300 is considered the max

Cat's Paw: 45mins of 15s @ 350g (Zwo dual band filter) the moon was shining almost right down the scope :/
Sculptor Galaxy: 45mins of 10s @ 250g (UV/IR cut)
The Great Barred Spiral Galaxy: 44mins of 30s @ 350g (UV/IR cut)
Triangulum Galaxy: 17mins of 10s @ 350g (UV/IR cut)
Andromeda: 8mins of 10s @ 300g (UV/IR cut)

There is some indication in the file names as to how I tortured them in PI.
Mostly Photometric Colour Calibration, Dynamic Background extraction x2 division & subtraction, ez Denoise, ez Soft Stretch and a little contrast and saturation curve.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Cat's Paw NebulaDB-HG_45m_15s_350g-1.jpg)
201.1 KB83 views
Click for full-size image (Sculptor Galaxy(45m)_HT_cropped-1.jpg)
216.1 KB71 views
Click for full-size image (Great_Barred_Spiral_Galaxy_44m_PCC_DBE_ezDN_ezSS_cS-1.jpg)
199.4 KB67 views
Click for full-size image (Triangulum_Galaxy(17m)_DBE_HT_cC_sC_crop-1.jpg)
196.6 KB79 views
Click for full-size image (Andromeda_Galaxy_8m__PCC_ABE_ezDC_ezDN_ezSS-1.jpg)
175.2 KB80 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-10-2022, 07:16 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
You are doing great..you just need to put more time in
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-10-2022, 09:22 AM
oska (John)
Illucid

oska is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Federal
Posts: 736
Thanks Alex. I realise they all need at least double or 10 times the data but I found it very interesting that the result from essentially injecting significant noise into the signal and then averaging or oversampling(?) it to get the detail out. Fascinating. Kinda, at least conceptually if not mathematically, like drizzle, kinda.
It was a technique I learned about when designing process control systems in the early 90's where you could get higher effective resolution data by averaging a deliberately noisy signal. Exactly like stacking.
It really was one of those "I should have packed it up hours ago" type nights.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-10-2022, 10:40 AM
Dave882 (David)
Registered User

Dave882 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: PADSTOW
Posts: 2,499
Very nice results for the integration times- especially ngc253 and m33. Keep experimenting and having fun- that’s what this hobby is all about!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-10-2022, 11:13 AM
oska (John)
Illucid

oska is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Federal
Posts: 736
Thanks Dave, they were definitely the standouts in the "OMG look at that!" kinda way. And thanks for the lofty heights to aim for
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement