Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 22-08-2017, 07:42 PM
Brian W's Avatar
Brian W (Brian)
The Wanderer

Brian W is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dumaguete Philippines
Posts: 757
Lagoon Nebula ~ NGC 6544 6553 6520 ~ Kaus Borealis ~ M28 ~ Star Cloud & Dust Lanes

I enjoy faint fuzzies and dust clouds. Can anyone suggest a lens to fit on my Sony Alpha a58 that would give me better shots than my Tamron 90mm 272E? For reasons unknown the color version didn't upload. Here's a link
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (frbs.jpg)
209.7 KB64 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-08-2017, 07:50 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
I've really enjoyed using my Sigma Art 85mm F/1.4. I've been using it at F/2.8 and it shows some aberrations but they're better by F/4.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-08-2017, 08:28 PM
Brian W's Avatar
Brian W (Brian)
The Wanderer

Brian W is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dumaguete Philippines
Posts: 757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
I've really enjoyed using my Sigma Art 85mm F/1.4. I've been using it at F/2.8 and it shows some aberrations but they're better by F/4.
I'll take a look, thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-08-2017, 08:30 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
http://www.astrobin.com/full/304742/0/

This is F/2.8 with a D7200. It isn't perfect out at the edges but for F/2.8 and wide field it is acceptable
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-08-2017, 10:03 PM
Brian W's Avatar
Brian W (Brian)
The Wanderer

Brian W is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dumaguete Philippines
Posts: 757
I'm new to astrophotography so forgive this newbee question: If you're getting that good a shot with an 85mm shouldn't I be close to that (barring different skills) with my 90?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-08-2017, 11:50 AM
Lognic04's Avatar
Lognic04 (Logan)
Registered User

Lognic04 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 889
Colin used much longer exposures - 180 seconds, thus reducing noise and getting more faint objects, and to further reduce the noise he stacked almost 40 frames to reduce noise further, which then allows you to stretch the data a lot more and still have it look good.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-08-2017, 02:15 PM
Brian W's Avatar
Brian W (Brian)
The Wanderer

Brian W is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dumaguete Philippines
Posts: 757
Okay so if my skill set was to equal Colin's skill set I would still need either a manually tracking mount with a wedge or something like a SkyWatcher?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-08-2017, 02:40 PM
Lognic04's Avatar
Lognic04 (Logan)
Registered User

Lognic04 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 889
yup!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-08-2017, 02:57 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
The lens does also help, to explain.

My first 85mm was a Nikkor 85mm F/1.8G, one of my first tests with it was some time on the Crux region. Ended up just ditching all of the data as the amount of CA was unusable even at F/5.6. It wasn't overly sharp with my D7200 so the colour rendition was non-existent , stars were soft and surrounded by purple halos.

It wasn't so bad for daytime use but for astro, I ditched most of what I took with it as it just wasn't well corrected, especially in coma as well.

Logan is correct though in that even a cheap tracking mount will help. I do a lot of wide field stuff with a 10 year old HEQ5 with stepper motors. An expensive mount with a poorly corrected lens will do better than a non tracking mount due to longer exposures. It also isn't about expensive lens'. My dirt cheap 50mm F1.8D at F/4 slaughters the 5x more expensive 85mm F/1.8G at any aperture.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-08-2017, 03:37 PM
Brian W's Avatar
Brian W (Brian)
The Wanderer

Brian W is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dumaguete Philippines
Posts: 757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lognic04 View Post
yup!
being a pensioner this will take a while but still lots to learn and much beauty to capture with the tools I've got.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 23-08-2017, 03:43 PM
Brian W's Avatar
Brian W (Brian)
The Wanderer

Brian W is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dumaguete Philippines
Posts: 757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
The lens does also help, to explain.

My first 85mm was a Nikkor 85mm F/1.8G, one of my first tests with it was some time on the Crux region. Ended up just ditching all of the data as the amount of CA was unusable even at F/5.6. It wasn't overly sharp with my D7200 so the colour rendition was non-existent , stars were soft and surrounded by purple halos.

It wasn't so bad for daytime use but for astro, I ditched most of what I took with it as it just wasn't well corrected, especially in coma as well.

Logan is correct though in that even a cheap tracking mount will help. I do a lot of wide field stuff with a 10 year old HEQ5 with stepper motors. An expensive mount with a poorly corrected lens will do better than a non tracking mount due to longer exposures. It also isn't about expensive lens'. My dirt cheap 50mm F1.8D at F/4 slaughters the 5x more expensive 85mm F/1.8G at any aperture.
The Tamron is an excellent match for my Sony Alpha a58 and the tracking mount is on the wish list. I realize that a Robber Fly in my garden can't be equated straight across to astrophotography but it does seem to work nicely so far
Save
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Robber Fly  On Orange Twig.jpg)
174.8 KB22 views
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23-08-2017, 06:26 PM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian W View Post
I realize that a Robber Fly in my garden can't be equated straight across to astrophotography but it does seem to work nicely so far
Save
It's a very nice fly Brian.

You should enter your image in to this month's IIS photo competition here.....

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=159853

after all your fly has wings, which is an entry requirement/theme for this month's photo challenge.

Best
JA

Last edited by JA; 23-08-2017 at 06:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 23-08-2017, 07:07 PM
Brian W's Avatar
Brian W (Brian)
The Wanderer

Brian W is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dumaguete Philippines
Posts: 757
I just did as you suggested.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement