Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-07-2017, 09:42 AM
astro744
Registered User

astro744 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,244
Baader AstroSolar film safety

Baader AstroSolar film safety
Baader AstroSolar film safety
Hello,

I ready recently on another forum that Baader AstroSolar film (silver mylar type not black polymer type) is not safe for unaided views of the Sun, i.e as eclipse shades; the reason being it passes unsafe levels of UV. This UV is filtered if the film is used with a telescope/eyepiece because of the glass.

I found the following on the astro-physics.com website, (see "Important Note"):

"Eye Safety
AstroSolar® is essentially free of pinholes. The patented, high-density coatings are deposited on both sides. As a result, the chance of two pinholes overlapping each other is extremely low. Baader AstroSolar® safety film has been approved by the National Bureau of Standards for eye safety in Germany and is CE tested and approved. All processes connected to this product have been thoroughly tested. Coatings are inspected constantly for consistency to ensure your eye safety!
Important note: AstroSolar® 5.0 is not designed to work as an "eclipse shade" or handheld solar filter and is not suitable for naked eye solar observation.

AstroSolar® film was designed to serve as a precision optical window for telescopic and photographic solar observation without deteriorating the optical wavefront. AstroSolar film must be used in front of the optical element of an astronomical telescope, telephoto lens or binocular. For visual observation, you must view through an eyepiece. Do not make a handheld solar filter and hold it directly in front of your eyes. If AstroSolar® 5.0 is being tested for visual observation ISO-specification, all tests must be performed with a telescope and eyepiece (or other optical instrument) added into the testing apparatus."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-07-2017, 01:49 PM
doppler's Avatar
doppler (Rick)
Registered User

doppler is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Mackay
Posts: 1,690
I think that you will find that the ND5 film is fine for visual, there is a ND3.8 photographic version that is not suitable for visual. OK there appears to be something to the article, but it is more to do with certification. Here's a link.
http://astrosolar.com/en/information...r-solar-films/

Last edited by doppler; 05-07-2017 at 02:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-07-2017, 02:43 PM
astro744
Registered User

astro744 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by doppler View Post
I think that you will find that the ND5 film is fine for visual, there is a ND3.8 photographic version that is not suitable for visual. OK there appears to be something to the article, but it is more to do with certification. Here's a link.
http://astrosolar.com/en/information...r-solar-films/
Thanks for the link; I didn't find this one.

No its the 5.0 visual film that I was referring to not the photographic version and the 'Important Note' I referenced implied 5.0 not suitable for visual without a some sort of optic, i.e. not unaided naked eye observation.

The link you show is even clearer in this regard and certification or not I would not be using the AstroSolar 5.0 safety film for unaided visual (naked eye only). The AstroSolar Silver/Gold film appears suitable for unaided visual according to the information provided in the link you referenced.

I thought I'd post this to inform anyone using AstroSolar film to not use it unaided (naked eye) not only for the upcoming solar eclipse (overseas) but also for general observation of the Sun. i.e. don't look at the Sun through AstroSolar 5.0 safety film unaided, naked eye.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-07-2017, 05:47 PM
doppler's Avatar
doppler (Rick)
Registered User

doppler is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Mackay
Posts: 1,690
Telescopes intensify light making it even brighter than naked eye, so I am a bit puzzled. I think maybe this more about durability, the Baader solar film we use with our scopes is not made for rough handling.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-07-2017, 06:26 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
The Baader ND5 solar film has been used successfully for many years in both naked eye and telescope applications.
Based on my twenty year experience with the Baader solar film, I personally think it is 100% safe to use for any solar viewing.
The issue seems to be related to mis-handling and possible damage.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-07-2017, 06:34 PM
astro744
Registered User

astro744 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,244
The issue was discussed on another forum. It is to do with UV light which is absorbed by any glass in the path but not when used unaided. I would recommend following any advice warning against the unaided visual use of the product.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-07-2017, 06:40 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Hmm
Have you actually reviewed the transmission spectrum of the ND5 Solar film??????
It effectively provides an ND5 attenuation across all the UV and into the NIR.
I need to republish a safety document prepared back in 2009, which gives details of the standards for protection.
(The document pdf is too big to upload 670Kb, but I can supply a copy on requested. There is a copy on the Solar Chat site, in the library files area.
ICNIRP_review https://solarchatforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2560)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-07-2017, 06:44 PM
astro744
Registered User

astro744 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,244
I don't need to test anything but follow the manufacturers recommendation. See about 3-4 paragraphs down at http://astrosolar.com/en/information...ect-your-eyes/

You have to use the silver/gold version for unaided visual views as the standard 5.0 visual version is only for use other than naked eye.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-07-2017, 06:59 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
http://www.threehillsobservatory.co....spectra_23.htm
https://www.rasc.ca/tov/safety


This makes interesting reading....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-07-2017, 08:08 PM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
No matter what experience and anecdotal evidence is given here, seems that the fact is that the manufacturer states it should not be used for direct visual, to advise otherwise seems unwise.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-07-2017, 08:59 PM
doppler's Avatar
doppler (Rick)
Registered User

doppler is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Mackay
Posts: 1,690
Apparently the standard has been updated and the old solar film doesn't pass, it's not far off spec though but rules are rules.
ISO 12312-2:2015 looks like you have to buy a copy here.

This is a brand-new worldwide standard, introduced in June 2015, which supersedes all previous standards, and pertains specifically to filter material intended for eye protection during direct solar viewing

https://www.eclipse-chasers.com/arti...%20Filters.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-07-2017, 02:04 AM
Steffen's Avatar
Steffen
Ebotec Alpeht Sicamb

Steffen is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toongabbie, NSW
Posts: 1,975
I've used the Baader ND5 film for years on my scopes, but for eclipse shades I actually prefer the black (-looking) polymer film, that used to be sold in the IIS Shop. It makes the sun look nicer
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-07-2017, 04:34 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
OK.....
The new ISO standard has changed the game.....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement