Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 23-04-2017, 09:58 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Newton the next telescope.

I think the Hubble Space Telescope should have been named The Issac Newton Telescope to give recognition to that great man.

Well the reasons are obvious ...the man was a genius above any other before or after.

The Hubble scope is after all a Newtonian telescope and although we here know who invented that scope many would not I expect.

How would NASA placed the Hubble in space without Newtons laws on gravity.
How would NASA do any thing in space without Newtons Gravity?
And does not General Relativity use Newtons Gravity.
And on a side note it ticks me off when folk talking about GR say Newton was wrong and I have even seen a video where Newton is portrayed as a fool.

His math, invented calculus I think, the gold standard his work on optics and I bet there is much more.
NASA should do something name something to pit that great genius on a pedestal...

Alex
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-04-2017, 10:06 AM
okiscopey's Avatar
okiscopey (Mike)
Rocky Peak Observatory

okiscopey is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kandos NSW
Posts: 536
G'day Alex, I agree with everything you said about Isaac Newton, but naming the HST as such would cause a bit of confusion with the existing Isaac Newton Telescope, currently on the Canary Islands and formerly in the UK Royal Greenwich Observatory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton_Telescope
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-04-2017, 10:16 AM
deanm (Dean)
Registered User

deanm is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 818
Newton was English, Hubble American.
Countries tend to name significant things after their own folk, not foreign nationals.
Can you think of anything in Oz named after someone other than an Aussie?
That's your answer, Alex!
Dean
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-04-2017, 10:23 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by okiscopey View Post
G'day Alex, I agree with everything you said about Isaac Newton, but naming the HST as such would cause a bit of confusion with the existing Isaac Newton Telescope, currently on the Canary Islands and formerly in the UK Royal Greenwich Observatory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton_Telescope
Thanks I feel better but I really want more.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-04-2017, 10:28 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanm View Post
Newton was English, Hubble American.
Countries tend to name significant things after their own folk, not foreign nationals.
Can you think of anything in Oz named after someone other than an Aussie?
That's your answer, Alex!
Dean
Thanks for trying to help Dean.
There would be a few things...how about Queen Victoria building?
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-04-2017, 10:34 AM
deanm (Dean)
Registered User

deanm is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 818
Good call Alex: but back in those days, Ozzies were English, and Victoria (like Liz today) was the 'Sovereign Queen of Australia' - we were just a dominion of The Empire.
We didn't become our own nation until 1901 (and even then, we were the 'Commonwealth of Australia').
Dean
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-04-2017, 11:46 AM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
The Yanks have a biscuit named the "Fig Newton". So obviously the name is copyright, trademarked, or a portion thereof. I wonder if anyone has taken "Fig Newtons" into space?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newtons_(cookie)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-04-2017, 12:07 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
And does not General Relativity use Newtons Gravity.
And on a side note it ticks me off when folk talking about GR say Newton was wrong and I have even seen a video where Newton is portrayed as a fool.
Very true Alex.
Here is what Einstein said about Newton's theory of gravity.

Quote:
No one must think that Newton’s great creation can be overthrown in any real sense by this [Theory of Relativity] or by any other theory. His clear and wide ideas will for ever retain their significance as the foundation on which our modern conceptions of physics have been built.
Here is a terrible thought.
With anti science governments in power and NASA's budget being slashed, NASA may need to rely more on private enterprise funding that will have a say in the naming rights for missions.

Imagine say in the year 2030 the "Microsoft Windows 700" space telescope is launched or the "Ronald McDonald Hamburger Plus" space probe to the dwarf planet Eris.

Shocking to contemplate.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-04-2017, 12:20 PM
OICURMT's Avatar
OICURMT
Oh, I See You Are Empty!

OICURMT is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laramie, WY - United States of America
Posts: 1,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
The Hubble scope is after all a Newtonian telescope and although we here know who invented that scope many would not I expect.
Isn't the Hubble and R-C design? or am I mistaken?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-04-2017, 12:34 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICURMT View Post
Isn't the Hubble and R-C design? or am I mistaken?
You are absolutely correct - Hubble is an RC telescope.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 23-04-2017, 01:36 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Ó
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanm View Post
Good call Alex: but back in those days, Ozzies were English, and Victoria (like Liz today) was the 'Sovereign Queen of Australia' - we were just a dominion of The Empire.
We didn't become our own nation until 1901 (and even then, we were the 'Commonwealth of Australia').
Dean
I realised that after I posted I though it would at least give me some time to come up with something else.
I can't its the only thing I have so I must contend ...but she wasn't really Australian, forget that part of her job description was to rule Australia she was British and therefore my example is even though not correct absolutely valid.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23-04-2017, 01:46 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICURMT View Post
Isn't the Hubble and R-C design? or am I mistaken?
You are correct but that does not mean you are right.

Part of it is a Newtonian mirror.

Anyways what does this have to do with his introduction of the gold standard.

Alex
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 23-04-2017, 01:47 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
Ó

I realised that after I posted I though it would at least give me some time to come up with something else.
I can't its the only thing I have so I must contend ...but she wasn't really Australian, forget that part of her job description was to rule Australia she was British and therefore my example is even though not correct absolutely valid.
Alex
Good Try Alex
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 23-04-2017, 01:50 PM
PCH's Avatar
PCH (Paul)
Registered User

PCH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 2,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanm View Post
Newton was English, Hubble American.
Countries tend to name significant things after their own folk, not foreign nationals.
Can you think of anything in Oz named after someone other than an Aussie?
That's your answer, Alex!
Dean
Only Queensland, NSW and Tasmania off the top of my head lol
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 23-04-2017, 01:54 PM
PCH's Avatar
PCH (Paul)
Registered User

PCH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 2,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanm View Post
Good call Alex: but back in those days, Ozzies were English, and Victoria (like Liz today) was the 'Sovereign Queen of Australia' - we were just a dominion of The Empire.
We didn't become our own nation until 1901 (and even then, we were the 'Commonwealth of Australia').
Dean
I know it's confusing but commonwealth in this context doesn't refer to the British Commonwealth. For example, Massachusetts is still known as the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Commonwealth just refers to the collective ability to move forward as a nation.

Definition: an independent state or community, especially a democratic republic.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 23-04-2017, 02:42 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCH View Post
Only Queensland, NSW and Tasmania off the top of my head lol
Add to that; Perth, Darwin, Adelaide, Sydney, Melbourne, Hobart, Brisbane and Didjabringabeeralong...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 23-04-2017, 02:48 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
You are correct but that does not mean you are right.

Part of it is a Newtonian mirror.

Anyways what does this have to do with his introduction of the gold standard.

Alex
While it is true that Isaac Newton made a first reflecting telescope, I would disagree that Hubble is a Newtonian telescope. Isaac used a spherical mirror and a plane mirror in his design, while RC telescope utilises two hyperbolic mirrors. RC telescope was invented by George Ritchey and Henri Chretien and it is a different design altogether. Why not credit Egyptians for making the first mirrors?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 23-04-2017, 05:11 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slawomir View Post
While it is true that Isaac Newton made a first reflecting telescope, I would disagree that Hubble is a Newtonian telescope. Isaac used a spherical mirror and a plane mirror in his design, while RC telescope utilises two hyperbolic mirrors. RC telescope was invented by George Ritchey and Henri Chretien and it is a different design altogether. Why not credit Egyptians for making the first mirrors?
Because they were not British and not Newton.

Well forget the telescope aspect let's focus upon gravity.

He invented gravity didn't he.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 23-04-2017, 05:55 PM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Gday Alex
Quote:
He invented gravity didn't he.
Not sure he "invented" it, as it was around before he was ;-).
He merely came up with a mathematical model to describe it.
( and "merely" here is a slight understatement :-) )
Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 23-04-2017, 06:19 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewJ View Post
Gday Alex

Not sure he "invented" it, as it was around before he was ;-).
He merely came up with a mathematical model to describe it.
( and "merely" here is a slight understatement :-) )
Andrew
Heck Andrew I can't take a trick.
Well if he didn't invent gravity who did?

Alex
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement