Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-09-2015, 03:31 PM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
30 Doradus with ASI120MM

Having a bit of fun with the ASI120MM. More than just a guide/planetary camera.
This is The Tarantula Nebula (also known as 30 Doradus) is an H II region in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). It was originally thought to be a star, but in 1751 Nicolas Louis de Lacaille recognised its nebular nature.
ASI120MM, GSO 8" F/4 Newtonian. 100 x 5sec + 75 x 4sec subs.

EDIT: Just noticed that there is some major Jpeg compression artifacts on this image.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (tarantula-2c.jpg)
196.9 KB83 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-09-2015, 03:50 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
It is really nice and bright! But yes, pastel looking jpeg compression
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-09-2015, 03:51 PM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
Strange, looked fine in Photoshop, must have overcooked it along the way
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2015, 09:24 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,475
Maaate...Sorry... that's a shocker.

5 second subs on H-alpha will only lead to more woe....as all you are doing
is multiplying the noise.

Try subs of several minutes plus some accurate calibration (darks/flats)

Time spent colimating the optics would also be well spent.

Stick with it and you should get some good results.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-09-2015, 05:18 AM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Maaate...Sorry... that's a shocker.

5 second subs on H-alpha will only lead to more woe....as all you are doing
is multiplying the noise.

Try subs of several minutes plus some accurate calibration (darks/flats)

Time spent colimating the optics would also be well spent.

Stick with it and you should get some good results.
Agree with you 100% Peter. Was only using the ASI120MM too so wasn't expecting great results but was setting the mount up refining polar alignment when i saw this object was high enough. I think i will come back to it once i get a dedicated Astro camera and mire time. Thanks for the input
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-09-2015, 06:35 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
right then. 5 sec Ha exposures. nice. worthy effort.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-09-2015, 06:48 PM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
right then. 5 sec Ha exposures. nice. worthy effort.
Not in Ha, this was just straight from the Camera, no filters... I will recheck my original post.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-09-2015, 06:50 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astroman View Post
Not in Ha, this was just straight from the Camera, no filters... I will recheck my original post.
Your right, not Ha , my bad.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-09-2015, 07:59 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
It would be very interesting Andrew to see how the data presents itself with stacking and a stretching only, without overcooking the nebulosity by heavy processing
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:25 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
The small version looks good. I reckon you just need more frames and less aggressive processing. Think in thousands of 5 sec frames to get the total time up. This is what I used to do with my old frame integration camera for comets. So 12 frames per minute, 720 frames per hour... yeah a few thousand frames would work well I reckon.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement