I spent several days at my dark site using this new scope. Its not fully setup yet as I am waiting on some adapters to fit a FLI Atlas focuser and a spare part for the filter wheel.
But I was able to focus manually in the meantime (it tricky as the critical focus zone is very small compared to other scopes I have used but it does snap to focus and the graph spikes suddenly, fine adjustments though are very hard to do with just the microfocuser).
Also there was some tilt that showed up in one corner with the Proline (may be from the filter wheel) that has to be corrected.
Tracking from the mount was not as good as it was last with the lighter AP140 so again an updated Polar Alignment and TPoint model should help there.
Having said all that the results were very good. This a small crop of a much wider field. The Proline is somewhat undersampled so I may reprocess this one and use Drizzle integration to round out some of the undersampled stars (not really visible unless you really zoom in).
I am impressed by this scope. It also works well with the small pixelled Sony camera (perhaps even better). Tilt tip sort out using CCDInspector and adjustments to the tilt/tip adapter is on the agenda.
This is only a 3 hours and 15 minute image (95 Luminance 40 mins RGB each).
Ideally a 10 hour image on this scope and these cameras should be very deep. So given reasonable weather that will be the type of image I will be going for 8-12 hours on a typical target. F3.8 is a blast that way. Exact focus, perfect squareness of components, exact autoguiding are the things that need to be done on this setup for it all to work and take advantage of the sharp optics.
Also on this image I did not have the fans going so perhaps that makes a difference as well. Its all a learning curve and its a good start.
I took an LRGB image of 5 minutes each filter and I was surprised at how deep and detailed the resulting image of 20 minutes is. This is why I wanted this scope to be able to take advantage of my dark skies but not being remotely controlled I need to get a bright image fast. I also have a galaxy image that I like and I took a Ha image that I also liked and again its pretty deep for only a 3 x 20minute 1x1 binned image.
I notice on this image there are some little diffraction spikes on some brighter stars, that seems to be from the microlenses. I don't see them on the Trius images.
This image is about 1/3rd of the full image so the Proline is not the best choice for a galaxy image and shows how sharp the optics are that they stand up to that much of a crop.
Taken from my dark site observatory in Bigga NSW.
http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/ima...22874/original
http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/image/159922874/large
Photos of the A RHA 305mm F3.8 setup:
http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/image/159928675/large
http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/image/159928686/large
And of course an Eta Carina 1st light test image of only 20 minutes total (LRGB 5mins each). Keep in mind there is no Ha exposure in this image even though it looks like there is:
http://www.pbase.com/image/159931632/large
12 inch aperture F3.8 as Mike knows gets a lot of signal fast. The quickest imaging scope I have ever used.
Greg.