8” F/4 astrograph , baader type 3 coma corrector,. HEQ Pro 5 mount, orion mini guider.
Camera.
Unmodded Cannon 1100D plus cooler box.10 x 8 minute subs an 10 x 5 minutes, ISO 1600, 36 x 2 minute subs at ISO 6400. Stacked in Deep Sky Stacker .Processed in Photoshop Cs2..
Cheers,
Justin.
A great improvement over the last attempt! All the Ha looks great, hard to believe it's from an unmodded camera. It is surprising what you can do plenty of signal and carefull processing.
nice round stars and good looking colours.i wish I could get nice looking stars with my qhy9 ccd
Thanks Shane!
Hope you sort out your star problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by atalas
Nice shot Justin.
Thanks Louie!
Quote:
Originally Posted by nebulosity.
Beautiful Justin
A great improvement over the last attempt! All the Ha looks great, hard to believe it's from an unmodded camera. It is surprising what you can do plenty of signal and carefull processing.
Cheers
Jo
Thanks Jo!
Yep, so far still heading in the right direction. I did spend a lot of time processing this image, it's tricky bringing out the details in the curtain while balancing the rest with OSC.
Nice work there Justin. Good colours and nice round stars. The Horsehead could do with a bit of sharpening though. I don't understand it really as the stars seem very sharp yet the Horsehead and Flame seem a bit soft - focus was a bit off?
A bit of deconvolution and mask the stars or selective sharpening.
Nice work there Justin. Good colours and nice round stars. The Horsehead could do with a bit of sharpening though. I don't understand it really as the stars seem very sharp yet the Horsehead and Flame seem a bit soft - focus was a bit off?
A bit of deconvolution and mask the stars or selective sharpening.
Greg.
Thanks Greg!
Try this one, I've softened the stars a little in the flame and sharpened slightly in the nebulae.
A nice HH overall but I agree with Greg that the HH and Flame look a little soft even in the repro. Maybe I've been spoiled by a few images from huge scopes in great seeing. I've never tried to image this one myself...
wow - that is super impressive for an unmodded dslr.
agree that is looks a bit soft, noise reduction?
also I was never a fan of the flame nebula, after shooting it this year it has really grown on me maybe even making my top 10; nothing else really similar to it in the skies.
A nice HH overall but I agree with Greg that the HH and Flame look a little soft even in the repro. Maybe I've been spoiled by a few images from huge scopes in great seeing. I've never tried to image this one myself...
Cheers,
Rick.
Thanks Rick!
I'm sure I could get it sharper with some more data. The ISO 6400 data wasn't in the best conditions.
Saying that I've done one more repro, it's as far as I'm willing to push it.
Starting to get noisy with too much sharpening.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rustigsmed
wow - that is super impressive for an unmodded dslr.
agree that is looks a bit soft, noise reduction?
also I was never a fan of the flame nebula, after shooting it this year it has really grown on me maybe even making my top 10; nothing else really similar to it in the skies.
cheers
rusty
Thanks Russell!
I did use some noise reduction, but it's mostly the ISO 6400 data that's the problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerg
That's inspiring - that much detail from an unmodded DSLR. Nice!
Thanks Roger!
I just have to work the data in photo shop than the CCD guy's, but it always surprises me what you can get from a standard DSLR and dark skies.
.i wish I could get nice looking stars with my qhy9 ccd
