Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
  #21  
Old 16-09-2014, 02:03 PM
frolinmod's Avatar
frolinmod
Registered User

frolinmod is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 573
I gather there is at least one PME II owner here.

Does anyone here have a PMX+ yet?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 16-09-2014, 04:56 PM
Rac's Avatar
Rac (Raymond)
Registered User

Rac is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Whangarei, New Zealand
Posts: 120
Another vote for the NJP. I have one and it really is good. Mines a Temma 2, I'm not sure what the Temma pc version is like but i'm sure It'll be good as the mechanics are all the same. They are smooth as but aren't the quickest slewing mounts around.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 16-09-2014, 05:38 PM
UniPol
Registered User

UniPol is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lithgow, NSW
Posts: 1,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by frolinmod View Post

Does anyone here have a PMX+ yet?
No, I'm waiting for the PMX+++ Jokes aside, I think my NJP Temma II is the best all round mount I've owned (I did have a PMX by the way), simple, robust and accurate.

Last edited by UniPol; 16-09-2014 at 08:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 16-09-2014, 05:40 PM
Logieberra's Avatar
Logieberra (Logan)
Registered User

Logieberra is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by frolinmod View Post
I gather there is at least one PME II owner here.

Does anyone here have a PMX+ yet?
From the pictures, the MX+ looks like a beautiful thing, adding to an already very capable MX.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 16-09-2014, 08:54 PM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
Another vote for the Tak NJP
Mine has a C11, VC200L, ST10XME with AO unit and a LISA spectrograph all hanging of it. It copes well.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 16-09-2014, 09:33 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Tak NJP would handle it and only just. I used to image sometimes with a TEC180 and NJP. That is at the max and I still managed round stars.

Software Bisque PMX would handle it, AP900, AP1100 would handle it.

The rule is to overmount your scope for imaging, for visual its less demanding. TOA150 on a G11 to me would be putting a Ferrari engine in a VW.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 16-09-2014, 10:23 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
. TOA150 on a G11 to me would be putting a Ferrari engine in a VW.

Greg.
I have spent many hours driving both (VW and Fezza) so feel qualified to say that's not quite accurate..

....that would only be case with the standard G-11 worm housing.

The OPB's are monolithic and very rigid. There is virtually no tangential play
(which as pretty much 99% of the system's rigidity)

As a result they are decidedly more rigid (and accurate) than the vanilla version.

G-11 shafts and bearings will happily support a Kenworth truck....hence my earlier recommendation.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 17-09-2014, 04:19 PM
johnnyt123 (John)
Registered User

johnnyt123 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Belmore, NSW
Posts: 363
I really appreciate everyone's input into this topic..

Although i have ultimately decided i want to get a Paramount MX+, I have decided to stick to my initial budget of $5000

it has come down to the following 3 mounts....

Losmandy Titan

MI250

Tak NJP

I cant decide and want to see what the popular vote is....
so i need all your help

regards...

John
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 17-09-2014, 05:09 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Tak NJP then. It would be at the limit though and there is no PEC but the basic PE is very smooth and you'll get round stars most of the time.
They need fast autoguider corrections like 1 second exposures. Use an OAG like a MMOAG and you should be at the limit but OK (actually past the Tak limit but it should still work).

I've had an MI250 and it was good and bad. I never got great tracking with it and the clutch system is a bunch of allen key screws that you need to undo when you want to move the scope manually - a pain. I was not a fan of the Gemini System myself and the motors and mounts are flimsy and easily burntout/broken. The Gemini system is a little complex.

I have heard good things about the Titan though.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 17-09-2014, 05:10 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
I have spent many hours driving both (VW and Fezza) so feel qualified to say that's not quite accurate..

....that would only be case with the standard G-11 worm housing.

The OPB's are monolithic and very rigid. There is virtually no tangential play
(which as pretty much 99% of the system's rigidity)

As a result they are decidedly more rigid (and accurate) than the vanilla version.

G-11 shafts and bearings will happily support a Kenworth truck....hence my earlier recommendation.
You know more about G11's and their upgrades than me so I would accept your data. Certainly there are quite a few good G11 mounted images around. OPB is the worm upgrade?

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 18-09-2014, 10:43 PM
johnnyt123 (John)
Registered User

johnnyt123 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Belmore, NSW
Posts: 363
Well after giving this much thought I have decided to wait and get a PMX or PMX+.

I will wait till I have a location to place a permanent observatory dome on which will house the mount and scope.

Many reviews and testimonies prove that is is a very capable mount and is cleverly designed with good software integration.

However should anyone feel the need to sell their PMX please let me know....

Regards

John
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 21-09-2014, 03:27 PM
Star Hunter
Registered User

Star Hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ellesmere, Qld
Posts: 210
I have a Titan 50 and swear by it but you won't get a new one under 5 grand, mate, Look at Bintel's prices... close to 10 grand!

Why not a SW EQ8? I've got that too and again, I swear by it. But it's your call. Not knowning what you'll swing on a mount, I'd say go for an EQ8 and it's under 5 grand.

Jim
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement