Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 25-06-2014, 07:22 AM
stevous67 (Steve M)
Registered User

stevous67 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 633
It's a very impressive timeline you have Mike, well done! Keep it up.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 25-06-2014, 09:15 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevous67 View Post
It's a very impressive timeline you have Mike, well done! Keep it up.

Steve
He he yeah, only broken from 1993 to 2002 while I was trying to become the worlds strongest man got close but no cigar...astronomy and astroimaging is much less strenuous

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 25-06-2014, 10:07 AM
cybereye's Avatar
cybereye (Mario)
Mozzies love me!

cybereye is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
He he yeah, only broken from 1993 to 2002 while I was trying to become the worlds strongest man got close but no cigar...astronomy and astroimaging is much less strenuous

Mike
Depends how big your scope is... I have trouble getting all my stuff inside if it starts to rain - too damn heavy!!!

Cheers,
Mario
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 26-06-2014, 03:17 PM
Paramount
Registered User

Paramount is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Harrogate UK
Posts: 344
Great comparison Mike, and as people have mentioned it's good to see how the advancements in technology have made such a difference
Best wishes
Gordon
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 26-06-2014, 03:58 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Ah....the memories...
What you need is a 30min exposure using a C5 with today's CCD....that would make an interesting comparison.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 26-06-2014, 04:52 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,389
True dat! The challenge has been set - there's even a C5 in the trader right now. Get to it Michelangelo!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 27-06-2014, 12:07 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paramount View Post
Great comparison Mike, and as people have mentioned it's good to see how the advancements in technology have made such a difference
Best wishes
Gordon
Amazing really, huh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
Ah....the memories...
What you need is a 30min exposure using a C5 with today's CCD....that would make an interesting comparison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
True dat! The challenge has been set - there's even a C5 in the trader right now. Get to it Michelangelo!
Actually, I almost did that HERE - both 30min of data, one taken with a C5 at 1300mm FL the other AG12 at 1120mm FL

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-07-2014, 04:28 PM
niharika
Registered User

niharika is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: melbourne
Posts: 216
Mike, I fond this post very aspiring for various reasons. Looking forward to another comparison from you in 2044
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-07-2014, 09:00 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by niharika View Post
Mike, I fond this post very aspiring for various reasons. Looking forward to another comparison from you in 2044
Yeah, at 77 suuuurely I will be automated by then ...or perhaps setting up my own space telescope each night

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-07-2014, 09:20 PM
phobos27's Avatar
phobos27 (Nick)
Registered User

phobos27 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 77
What a great comparison! It is great to see how far we have come with imaging over this time! That last photo is awesome!

Keep up the good work.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 02-07-2014, 09:36 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by phobos27 View Post
What a great comparison! It is great to see how far we have come with imaging over this time! That last photo is awesome!

Keep up the good work.
Believe it or not in 1984 that B&W photo of the Sombrero galaxy was actually of quite a good standard for amateurs...hard to imagine huh?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-07-2014, 10:29 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Oh I can imagine it. Been there, done that, still doing it. But it was fun wasn't it? With hopes high, not knowing what would come of it until the film was developed.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-07-2014, 10:36 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
Oh I can imagine it. Been there, done that, still doing it. But it was fun wasn't it? With hopes high, not knowing what would come of it until the film was developed.
We didn't know any different...as we still don't, that's just what we did. The future is very hard to imagine or predict

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-07-2014, 11:35 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
I predict that whatever equipment we use, we will still be taking many hours to capture deep sky. That one factor doesn't seem to change...
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-07-2014, 08:00 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
I predict that whatever equipment we use, we will still be taking many hours to capture deep sky. That one factor doesn't seem to change...
Yeah maybe...but lets hope not

(real) adaptive optics would be good

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-07-2014, 08:45 PM
el_draco (Rom)
Politically incorrect.

el_draco is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tasmania (South end)
Posts: 2,315
Yeah, I remember reading a book by Jack Newton in my teens and thinking the images were awe inspiring, which, of course they were for the time. The state of the art stuff from back then rates as basic first attempts these days..... Amazing when I sometimes struggle to pick the amateur work from Hubblle!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement