Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 08-06-2014, 10:57 PM
skysurfer's Avatar
skysurfer
Dark sky rules !

skysurfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 33S 150E (AU holiday)
Posts: 1,181
How to *objectively* measure sky quality ?

I mean particularly in transparency, not seeing.

* NELM: is very personal. Under the same sky one person sees until +6.2 and the other to +5.5.
* SQM: is brighness in magnitudes per square arc second. Unreliable. A "perfect" dark sky (which never happens) has a luminance of zero i.e. an SQM of -infinity as magnitude is logarithm of luminance. Real examples like a fully overcast sky of very hazy sky at a very dark location render a high SQM of more than 22 while no, resp. fewer stars are visible.

The best alternative is : Take a photo of a starfield around the zenith (always the same lens (or zoom factor in case of a compact camers), aperture, ISO setting, white balance and exposure time. Compare the photo with a star chart (Stellarium, Skysafari or a paper atlas) to get the actual limiting magnitude.

Does somebody have ideas on this ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-06-2014, 11:21 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
In my opinion all that matters is you pick a system that suits you to gauge relative quality. I like my SQM and use it at every dark site I go to and the backyard and in terms of realative darkness it is a good measure but it cannot measure 'seeing'- that is still subjective for most peope as eye sight, age, etc affect it as well as atmo, heat, angle of view through the atmo, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-06-2014, 06:24 AM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
SQM isn't subjective which I prefer, but depending on which part of the sky I point my SQM-L at I can get vastly different readings. There is a formula to convert SQM to NELM:

NELM=7.93-5*log(10^(4.316-(SQM/5))+1)

and one for NELM to SQM:

SQM = 21.58 - 5 log(10^(1.586-NELM/5)-1)

Last edited by mithrandir; 09-06-2014 at 10:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-06-2014, 10:13 AM
algwat (Alan)
Registered User

algwat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne, west
Posts: 286
So, how does this more technical method compare to this simpler one that any body could use visually , or with binoculars?

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=121660

I was thinking of a zenith cam approach, or if you have an allsky measure the zenith area, or a few degrees around zen. It could also be used as a twinkle-o-meter to measure air turbulence? These are all concepts I am slooowly working into my DMK ALLsky meteor camera.

Interested to read if anyone is looking to use the current available java based languages to program your own solutions to these astronomical problems?

kind regards, Alan Watson
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement