Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis
A fascinating cosmic scene Ray - top work.
Love the overall look, details, wispy structures, curtains of nebulosity and the stark contrast of the darker globules.
Cheers
Dennis
|
Thanks Dennis. As you know, it's hard to get the right balance when processing, so appreciate your feedback.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
Great level of detail, Ray! Looking forward to the colour version.
Cheers,
Rick.
|
Thanks Rick. was nice to have good seeing for a change - in contrast, just packed up for the night with seeing sitting on about 4 arc sec.
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
Sublime. Best I've seen to date. 
|
wow, thanks for that Marc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese
Very nice Ray. Naturally I compared your image with my full res version (not online). I note that your full res image has next to no noise visible at all and only half the data. I am using 30 minute subs but you are using 5 minute subs. f ratio will influence that though, f8 is very slow and requires quite deep subs to get the ADU up over 1000. 30 minutes gives me 1152 ADU at f8 with the STXL11002.
Detail is very nice and I like your composition too.
|
thanks Paul. Apart from the field of view, I thought the two images looked very similar - but of course I didn't have access to your full res result.
Re the exposure time difference, the optics of both systems produce almost identical photon flux/pixel, so I think that the factor of 2 difference in exposure time is nearly all down to the the 65% Ha QE of the 694 chip vs the 30% of the 11002. The 11002 has about 2.5x the read noise of the 694, so your subs need to be about 6x as long as mine (this scales roughly with read noise squared) - with your 30 minute subs and my 5 minute subs, that is what we actually used. We would both benefit from longer Ha subs though, to keep the read noise contribution as low as possible.
Regards Ray