Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-03-2014, 10:15 AM
graham.hobart's Avatar
graham.hobart (Graham stevens)
DeepSkySlacker

graham.hobart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hobart, tasmania
Posts: 2,241
hypothetical GSO truss question

If you had a 10" truss GSO cassegrain and then mounted a refractor which weighed approx. 7kg on the losmandy plate on top, would this cause unforgivable flexure?
I don't know how rigid the CF struts and rings are but would putting another scope on top cause major issues?
Graham
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-03-2014, 01:25 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
The new truss itself seems quite rigid to me andI would think that a scope on top should not cause a problem internally to the truss system.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-03-2014, 01:32 PM
graham.hobart's Avatar
graham.hobart (Graham stevens)
DeepSkySlacker

graham.hobart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hobart, tasmania
Posts: 2,241
GSO truss

Thanks Paul, am considering upping my image scale now I am happy with a wide field refractor.
Umm, now where to go to.....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-03-2014, 04:37 PM
graham.hobart's Avatar
graham.hobart (Graham stevens)
DeepSkySlacker

graham.hobart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hobart, tasmania
Posts: 2,241
Gso truss

second question, is there any real advantage to the truss over the 10" solid tube if you are in a protected obs /(apart from looking way cool?)
I mean what do you gain apart from cool down time ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-03-2014, 05:09 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Graham I think the solid tube carbon version would be better than the metal tube simply for focus stability. I found that the 12 inch was not terribly good for holding focus. Though this might not be the case for the 10".

The truss would cool down very quickly and hold focus well. Though dew on the secondary would need to be handled.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-03-2014, 09:43 AM
graham.hobart's Avatar
graham.hobart (Graham stevens)
DeepSkySlacker

graham.hobart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hobart, tasmania
Posts: 2,241
GSO truss

I wonder how you would go balancing a scope like a 110mm refractor on top of the truss? it would seem to put all the weight on the primary end as that is where the d plate is?
I would have thought it would be easier to balance a CF solid tube with the full length D plate.
? any thoughts
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-03-2014, 01:20 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by graham.hobart View Post
I wonder how you would go balancing a scope like a 110mm refractor on top of the truss? it would seem to put all the weight on the primary end as that is where the d plate is?
I would have thought it would be easier to balance a CF solid tube with the full length D plate.
? any thoughts
You could use another longer D bar and install that instead of the bars on the scope.

Though you could move the main scope a long way up on the saddle.

Not impossible as people have been doing this for year. I would contact Peter Ward. He has a similar configuration.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement