Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
Very dramatic, Fred! I'm looking forward to the colour version.
|
Thanks Rick, coming up
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward
A blooming streak or so to remove, but most excellent.
I really like the FWHM's. Sublime.
Time to leave the monastery grasshopper 
|
Cheers Peter, yes, that was the only blooming I had with 40min subs, left them in au naturale. Um, im a bit thick, am I in a monastery?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pluto
Great image of a great target 
|
Thanks Hugh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter.M
Did Mike really take the sledgey to your scope? stars look a little weird and they weren't in your eagle image. Great image none the less.
|
Ta, Yes, somethings sticky in RA and it hickups sometimes, and theres no PEC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spookyer
Yes, very dramatic.
|
It is, a relatively easy one to process, lots happening there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod771
Thats nice Fred! 
|
Thanks Rod.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher
That's incredible.
|
Cheers Kevin
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
|
Thanks Marc. Its full frame 2400fl.
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Ah, a super narrow field Marc Aragnou image
Pretty cool Fred, you are having some new found fun with that scope being up there huh?
Mike
|
Thanks Mike. This is full frame, no croping, so its pretty wide really. Haveing the luxury of the scope chugging away night after night sure is fun, yes

.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
Great image Fred. I see detail in faint streamers not normally seen.
Very good choice of framing as well. Its a winner.
Greg.
|
Thanks Greg, yes I was supprised how easy the streamers poped out, its the megadata wot done it. The framing was where Sky 6 put it, lucky.
Quote:
Originally Posted by philiphart
Looks great Fred. Great tonal range and contrast.. looks perfect on my monitor.
Phil
|
Thanks Phil. Startools does a pretty good job sorting tone and range, whilst tracking/removing noise without loosing detail. There wasnt much noise though, with 22hrs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjjnettie
Epic image Fred. That's really something. 
|
Thanks JJJ. hehe epic, I like that. The subject itself is pretty epic looking so epicness was handely built in
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese
Cracker Jack image Freddo. Love the contrast that this band pass has produced. I followed Don's advice and have a couple of 5nm and one 3nm on the way to me right now. Your image has cemented that I made the right decision. Star shapes are a bit odd, but the detail more than makes up for that.
|
Thanks Paul. Well, 3nm sure helped with this image, but as I learnt from AAIC though, its not allways appropriate. I always struggled with the Helix and 3nm for years, tiny noisey signal, thought it was just dim, then lately I tried NII and bang, huge signal !!!! , more than Ha!. As Don said, 5 or 7nm Ha or up collects Ha and NII which is far better for say Helix, unless you want them sperate. Im now doing 3nm NII on Helix. I have
no idea how I will colour map Ha NII SII OIII. I dont want to combine Ha and NII, such a waste of imaging time. Friggen stars again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by E_ri_k
That looks great Fred, reminds me of the sun trying to peek through some thick cloud 
Erik
|
Thanks Eric, yes it does look like that, which gives it that attractive epicness.