Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 03-08-2013, 04:45 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,658
The Devil's Mask in Pavo

Ok kokay, here's a galaxy in fact three, all having a little dance

At 160 Million Ltyrs, the two spirals NGC 6769 and 6770 are very small galaxies on the sky, each measuring only about 2' in size so it was a real test of the resolution of the new system. The seeing varied across the 4+ hrs of Lum but at times it was actually pretty good too, so hallelujah .

The Devils Mask

Here are just his EYES

To help identify the little details better, here is a Comparison with 8m VLT image

Some super faint star streams linking the galaxies can be seen HERE

Hope you like

Mike
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC-6769-&-6770-LRGB-large-LCE-blend-rot2-small.jpg)
25.3 KB229 views

Last edited by strongmanmike; 04-08-2013 at 09:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-08-2013, 06:00 AM
cybereye's Avatar
cybereye (Mario)
Mozzies love me!

cybereye is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,287
Wow, you have more detail within the galaxies than the VLT - fantastic!

Mario
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-2013, 08:47 AM
PRejto's Avatar
PRejto (Peter)
Registered User

PRejto is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rylstone, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,502
Mike! Another great image from your super setup. Of course it's the way that you use your kit that is so impressive...

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-08-2013, 09:02 AM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Well done Mike,nice image.
Brendon Downs (Thunderchildobs) found his first supernova in Ngc6769 about 10 years ago.
I observe this group quite a lot when it is favourable in our sky.
I must admit I have never heard this group called the devils eyes before
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-08-2013, 09:26 AM
DJT (David)
Registered User

DJT is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,459
Great image, I like indeed.

Seriously impressed with the comparisons as well.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-08-2013, 09:42 AM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
Top image, Mike!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-08-2013, 09:42 AM
Derek Klepp's Avatar
Derek Klepp
Registered User

Derek Klepp is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NE NSW
Posts: 2,468
Top pics.Have you done M74 with the SN yet?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-08-2013, 10:09 AM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Wonderful work Mike!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-08-2013, 01:52 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by cybereye View Post
Wow, you have more detail within the galaxies than the VLT - fantastic!

Mario
Cheers Mario, yes, I was very happy to see the detail coming down, with OAG, small pixels and no bloody wind not to mention no darks or flats, I'm in heaven

Quote:
Originally Posted by PRejto View Post
Mike! Another great image from your super setup. Of course it's the way that you use your kit that is so impressive...

Peter
Thanks Peter..it isn't that hard really

Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
Well done Mike,nice image.
Brendon Downs (Thunderchildobs) found his first supernova in Ngc6769 about 10 years ago.
I observe this group quite a lot when it is favourable in our sky.
I must admit I have never heard this group called the devils eyes before
Cheers
Cheers Ron, I saw the reference to Devils Mask in the press release for that VLT image

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJT View Post
Great image, I like indeed.

Seriously impressed with the comparisons as well.

Thnaks David, yes my comparisons raise the ire of some but meah, it's just good to see what I am actually picking up, provides some reference I guess

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larryp View Post
Top image, Mike!
Cheers Larry

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Klepp View Post
Top pics.Have you done M74 with the SN yet?
No, only just found out about it actually but food for thought...

Quote:
Originally Posted by atalas View Post
Wonderful work Mike!
Thanks Big Louie
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-08-2013, 02:15 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
That's beautiful, Mike.

What a stunning object.

Digging the faint background fuzzies, too.

H
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-08-2013, 02:50 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,781
Top work Mike.
It looks in some ways better than the VLT.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-08-2013, 03:22 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Thanks Mike, I suppose when you have 8.2 meter telescopes to play with, you can name almost anything you like
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-08-2013, 03:32 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Great work Mike. You have to be happy with the resolution. 0.84 arcsec/px I gather - looking forward to the future exploits of this rig.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-08-2013, 03:55 PM
ChrisM's Avatar
ChrisM
Sandy Ridge Observatory

ChrisM is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Gippsland, VIC
Posts: 768
Nice work Mike. Not one I've seen before, and your galaxy detail compares well with the VLT pic.
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-08-2013, 04:24 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Excellent. I tempted to have a go too now.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-08-2013, 06:16 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,078
Really clear close up. Tiny indeed. Great details and colours.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-08-2013, 07:28 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Hope you like
Like I do.

Great work, Mike. Your seeing must have been fantastic as the resolution can be likened to that of a 24" scope, a la Capella Observatory. Incredible detail. At the fast light gathering focal ratio you are operating at, is there a reason why you didn't pick up the 'bridge' between NGC6769 and NGC6771? Actually there is an even fainter arc reaching back around to NGC6770 too but suspect that would be more of a challenge requiring uber data, and finally darks and flats . Its present in the AAO plate if you want to take a squiz. Good to see something new. A breeze of fresh air. Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-08-2013, 12:53 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
That's beautiful, Mike.

What a stunning object.

Digging the faint background fuzzies, too.

H
Thnaks H, yes seeing background galaxies always makes an image I recon

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Top work Mike.
It looks in some ways better than the VLT.
Yeah..? Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
Thanks Mike, I suppose when you have 8.2 meter telescopes to play with, you can name almost anything you like
Cheers
Wonder what would happen if they imaged the Rosette

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF View Post
Great work Mike. You have to be happy with the resolution. 0.84 arcsec/px I gather - looking forward to the future exploits of this rig.
Hi Rob, yes very happy so far and I am looking forward to every clear night now, even if windy

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisM View Post
Nice work Mike. Not one I've seen before, and your galaxy detail compares well with the VLT pic.
Chris
Cheers Chris and yes it isn't imaged much at all, surprising really.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Excellent. I tempted to have a go too now.
Glad you liked it Fred

Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Really clear close up. Tiny indeed. Great details and colours.
Thanks Marc

Quote:
Originally Posted by jase View Post
Like I do.

Great work, Mike. Your seeing must have been fantastic as the resolution can be likened to that of a 24" scope, a la Capella Observatory. Incredible detail. At the fast light gathering focal ratio you are operating at, is there a reason why you didn't pick up the 'bridge' between NGC6769 and NGC6771? Actually there is an even fainter arc reaching back around to NGC6770 too but suspect that would be more of a challenge requiring uber data, and finally darks and flats . Its present in the AAO plate if you want to take a squiz. Good to see something new. A breeze of fresh air. Well done.
Thanks Jase Regarding the faint arcs and bridges, I can see the bridge between NGC 6769 and 6771 in the colour shot (actually it connects all 3 galaxies) but the much fainter and longer arc between NGC 6771 and NGC 6770 requires some stretching and contrast enhancement
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-08-2013, 09:39 AM
E_ri_k (Erik)
Registered User

E_ri_k is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lakes Entrance
Posts: 846
Awesome Mike, that's a great image! Does look like a twisted up mask, I like it That's a pretty faint set of galaxies right?

Erik
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-08-2013, 11:55 AM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
well yeah, that's actually pretty darn good.
the promise of the 694 systems was that they should be able to produce a good image of a faint fuzzy in one night - looks like they can do it very nicely with a dark site. Regards ray

Last edited by Shiraz; 04-08-2013 at 12:45 PM. Reason: fix dud expression
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement